Jump to content

revkevsdi

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by revkevsdi

  1. 3 hours ago, Sleepr2 said:

    Suddenly you and the kayaking champion are concerned about lies  :lol:

    Woooohooo!!! I’m a kayak champion now.  Lies. Yeah. You mean like how Trump lies way more than Obama and Hillary combined, yet you can’t figure it out?  Those lies ?

    2 hours ago, DriftBusta said:

    Jesus, could Slinger and his flunkies be any more pathetic?  Tillerson comes out and basically kills the fake narrative dead in his tracks, and these assholes are still trying to twist it into something against Trump. :lol: 

    Basically. Not literally or completely denies?   Because earlier one of the posse posted a video that showed him sort of not answering but trying to pretend he was. It was pretty good. 

    Woukdnt it have been awesome if Tillerson had told the truth. “Yeah, I called him a fucking moron. Look at him, listen to him, he’s a fucking. Ape for Christ sake”. 

    Drops mike and walks away. 

  2. 22 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

    he called trump a moron and he's not happy working with him. perfect example of what i'm talking about, you're clueless. anyone who watches real news knows that there is, and has been,  conflict there. but tillerson comes out and tries to calm things, but doesn't deny the "moron" comment, and you treat the whole thing as fake news. you and your fellow nitwits do this every fucking time the mean old media comes out with stuff like this, only to be proven wrong shortly thereafter. one would think you'd have learned by now, but no.

     

     

     

    Why would anyone think Tillerson calling Trump a Fucking Moron is fake news?

    It's hard to imagine anyone not thinking Trump is a fucking Moron.

    I think if the clown posse were honest they'd admit that every time they hear that idiot speak, they think "Fucking Moron"

     

  3. 3 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

    https://newrepublic.com/article/115624/exxon-oil-spill-arkansas-2013-how-pipeline-burst-mayflower

    "The Mayflower spill should alarm communities along Keystone’s proposed route. Experts believe it happened in part because the leaden crude from the Alberta tar sands erodes pipelines faster than the oil the U.S. is used to shipping: Bitumen is so thick, it has to be transported at higher pressures and temperatures, and it must be diluted with gas before it can flow, which can lead to violent pressure swings inside the pipeline. This new danger isn’t inspiring much caution in the energy industry, judging by the Associated Press's recent revelation that 300 spills have occurred in North Dakota alone in less than two years, and all were kept secret. On average, U.S. pipelines spilled over 3.1 million gallons a year between 2008 and 2012, according to the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). As for the Keystone project, Public Citizen released a report this month documenting over 125 patches, dents, and other worrisome anomalies in its southern half."

     

    Evidently it’s the chemicals needed to dilute the crude that is the real danger to the environment.  Poisonous stuff. But it will mix nicely with that coal dust Dotard wants in your rivers. 

    Drink up fuckers :junk:

  4. 6 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

    I don't doubt that for a minute and man am I glad :lol:

    point - because we are a bunch of dumbasses, dumbasses who voted trump, Canada will now run their dirty oil down through our country to be exported, rather than thru their yard to their own port. why is the point so hard to figure out dude?

     

    Thanks for that by the way. Since water is going to be a hot commodity, I’m glad you’ll be polluting yours and not ours. 

     

  5. 7 hours ago, Biggie Smails said:

    Nope and that’s because MSNBC has been throwing a temper tantrum since Trump won but who would have thought they would resort to this...lying and fabricating. They are a joke and that reporter really should be ostracized but as long as dumbfucks like you believe this shit it won’t happen.

    Yeah, you wouldn’t want anyone telling lies About the President. Lol. This is awesome, A Trump supporter who pretends the truth is important. 

    “Obama tapped my phone “

    ”I won’t golf”

    ”the russian meeting was about adoption”

  6. 9 hours ago, Rigid1 said:

    Omg, you are actually scared of a black gun. :hdchr:

    FYI, people hunt with AR's all the time, 3 of the 4 I work with hunt with guns based on the AR platform.. You aren't that intelligent are you.. 

    People hunt with a bow as well. I guess it comes down to skill. 

    I’m not scared of guns. We have gun control. It works quite well. A year ago a “terrorist “ tried to kill the Prime Minister. One soldier died, one other got shot and he got taken out by a 60 year old master at arms.   Really sad for the soldier. But it would have been terrible if that guy had access to the kind of firepower the Vegas shooter had. The cool thing is that we don’t have to spend our time worrying about your national pass time. Mass shootings 

    5 hours ago, BOHICA said:

    Prairie poodle town, an AR, plenty rounds and some Pabst make for a good time.  My buddy said pig hunting is pretty damn fun with an AR.  He goes on a Texas hunt every year.

    There you go. Tell me more about people learning to have respect for firearms. Then tell me about drinking while you hunt. Dumbass 

  7. ·

    Edited by revkevsdi

    1 hour ago, Rigid1 said:

    Wooosh

    Ohhh I get, your using that old “ if you outlaw guns ..... “ bullshit. 

    See, here’s the thing. That guy had a shit ton of legal guns that he used to murder a bunch of young kids At a Concert. Now if they had been illegal, there is a chance he would have been caught before he used them. Either the supplier would have been caught and his customer list found or someone would have noticed his collection, told the cops and they would have confiscated them. 

    But they were legal so he was able to transport them to a hotel along with legal ammo and use them as they were designed.  To pump the life out of people. 

    Im not saying they should take away everything, just the stuff that isn’t used for hunting   

    I know you love them,  sure they make up for your feelings of inadequacy. Whether it’s your small dick or that your a shittu fighter. But you’ve colllectively proven that as a nation you are too stupid to have unfettered access.

    So it would be a good idea if the only way you can play with those toys is when you join the forces and get shipped overseas.  

    Maybe that will help with recruitment.  

     

  8. Has there ever been a time when a Secretary of State has had to deny calling the President a Moron?

    Best part is that he claims he didn't call Trump a Moron. Which is technically correct since it was actually reported that he called him a fucking Moron. Which is technically accurate.  

     

  9. 13 hours ago, JEFF said:

    Similar cultures? Yeah... ok. What do you have to match chicago, Detroit, Baltimore? besides strict gun laws like those shitholes do? I find it odd that the most liberal gun quashing communities in our country have the highest gun related crime in our country, conversely the communities where guns are allowed have the lowest gun related crime rates. Even a retard like you should be able to make the correlation. 

     

     

    You're a retard.

    You're kind of dumb. It's not like they have to cross a border and go through security. There is nothing to stop them from carrying guns into those areas.  But why not compare the crime rate in Vancouver to Seattle? Windsor to Detroit.  There are many similarities.

    No country around has had the proliferation of mass shootings that the US has had.  

    But I"m all for you keeping it going.  There are some stupid people in Canada that think we should have more relaxed gun laws.

    As long as you stupid fuck keep dropping like flies with that same deer in the headlights look (duh there's nothing that can be done),  Canadian politicians wouldn't dream of relaxing the rules.

     

  10. 11 hours ago, f7ben said:

    Take out suicides and gang violence and the stats in the US are no worse than any other nation on earth .....that is a fact

    Go fuck yourselves braindead retarded faggot cry bitch gun pussies. Try and fucking learn something for a change

    There has never been a restrictive gun law put into place that did anything at all to deter gun crime .....because criminals dont care about the law

    Slinger the fucking retard is fine with the US dropping 26,171 bombs on countless civilians in 7 different countries during peace time but his cunt bleeds endlessly at the thought of a law biding citizen being able to legally purchase a small firearm. What a fucking out of touch retarded cunt 

    :pan:

  11. 9 hours ago, SSFB said:

    Facts don't care about your feelings.

    22195444_714165628789475_375087055912104

     

    That chart compares number of guns. Not number of people with guns. If idiots like you bought 5 extra guns because you believed Obama was going to git yer guns. Then that stat is useless. 

    A more useful stat would be people with guns.  

    The stats you should look at is mass killing and compare yourself to every rich nation. You are the absolute worst. 

    You peope are always ready to judge people in poor nations and feel no sympathy because they won’t do obvious things to help themselves.  Why would anyone have sympathy for these events when you refuse to take the obvious cure?

    From a distance the rest of us look at you like we look at a child who was told not to lick frozen metal in the winter. What did you think would happen?  Difference is, you dumb fuckers lick the metal pole every few days.  That’s right I called you a bunch of pole lickers  

     

  12. 6 hours ago, Biggie Smails said:

    The point was that gun ownership has gone up and the murder rate down and you fucking morons ignore it now go fuck off somewhere else ya shitbag.

    Violent crime rate went gone down 16 years after roe vs wade. 

    How is your crime rate measured for that chart?  Do all the kids murdered at Sandy hook count as one crime? What about the 500 plus people fucked over at Vegas? Is that one crime?  

    I don’t think anyone wants to take a hand gun away from the majority of Americans. It would make you safer to ban all guns in civilians hands. But we all know that baby needs a soother. 

    It’s weapons that are capable of killing large numbers of civilians in a short amount of time that must be banned.  Your interpretation of the second amendment is killing innocent people. Stop being such stupid cowards and do something about it.

    The argument about knives or cars killing people is bullshit.  You know damn well that the brave teacher that shielded her class from gunfire would have fought a guy with a knife and allowed some to escape. 

    The car argument is crap as well. Most people use their cars for an hour or two each day. They serve a purpose that does not involve killing people. 

  13. 1 hour ago, Biggie Smails said:

    Exactly...I heard that stat today...weird that the smarmy Canucks can't get it through  their poutine soaked brains.

    It’s difficult not to be smarmy when  you stupid fucks keep looking yourselves. We have very similar cultures. Check out the different murder rates. 

    Compare the amount of people a maniac with a van and knife was able to kill last week and compare it to your Vegas loon. Both were intent on murder. One couldn’t get the arsenal he needed. 

    Ill take our gun laws any day. 

  14. 14 hours ago, Highmark said:

    Same could be said about the 4th amendment and electronics.   You think the founders intended for illegal search and seizures to go on thru history and only cover someone's home or "person" meaning what they had directly on them or were forward thinking enough to realize their wording needed protections eventually that went beyond that.   

    Of course they didn’t. But the fact that the nra has you convinced that their meaning included auto and semi auto weapons doesn’t mean that interpretation is correct. 

    I saw a meme today that said, what’s the big deal with Kim Jong getting an atomic bomb.  People detonated bombs, the Bomb isn’t the problem. 

    14 hours ago, Highmark said:

    Your assumption is everyone in govt, the military and the police would turn on its fellow citizens.   

    No your assumption is.  That’s why you claim to need weapons. But assuming your government isn’t satisfied with stealing from you and polluting your soil. Suppose they wanted to end some of you.  They only need an elite group with gun ships to take you out section by section. It’s not like you will stand up for each other. 

    14 hours ago, racer254 said:

    Is a tyrannical government going to convince all the military to go and use  military equipment against it's own people?

     

    You beat me to it.

    See above. 

  15. It's probably a good idea.  That way when you are defending yourself against a terrorist, he won't be able to hear where your shots are coming from.  Also in a home invasion, it would hide your position.  

    Great idea Dotard Dump.   

    To answer where Congress stands, they stand with whoever gives them the most money.

    Please continue to send your thoughts and prayers to the victims.  It's all they really need.

  16. 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said:

    I think history has shown us quite well what happens to unarmed masses go up against well armed authoritarian governments.  I certainly am not advocating more powerful weapons to be sold to the masses.  No government can last long against it's own population no matter how well it is armed as long as something like the second amendment is in place.  

    And on the bold. One guy just took out 58 people and wounded 400 with guns he more than likely bought legally under the second amendment. There are 300 million US citizens so yea I think the people would have an excellent chance against a tyrannical government. 

    Every Western nation has stricter gun laws than the US. Please explain why they have more freedoms than the USA.? Why haven't they been taken over by their government? Why do they all have fewer mass killings?  

    Either the proliferation of weapons is to blame or  Americans are too violent or stupid to be allowed access to the gun cabinet.

    Either way you'd be safer with less weapons.

  17. 8 hours ago, Zambroski said:

    Not yet......and I don't see it being a war.  I see strategic targeting.  Once China gives us the green light...I think that will happen.  Big question...what color will their "green light" be?

    Strategic targeting might take out some of their Nuclear capability. But use your search engine and your pretend knowledge of war to read up on what NK is capable of doing with conventional weapons. Also look at the command structure to see if taking out the head will actually stop their conventional weapons from killing a lot of people in Seoul. 

    5 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

    strategic strikes? and you accuse others of being a dumbfuck? :lol: 

    Yes he is.

    4 hours ago, Mainecat said:

    500,000 Americans live in Seoul Korea less than a hundred miles from the NK border. Strategic strikes? What a fuckin clown.

    That number is probably wrong. However it's suggested that NK could wipe out one million people in Seoul within 24 hours using conventional weapons. 

    32 minutes ago, SSFB said:

    The "strategic" or "surgical" strikes we did in Iraq and Afghanistan have killed lots of innocent people. 

    Or were you using it in some other context?

    I'm not sure Zambroski gives a fuck who dies. Nothing gets lost if Tillerson keeps talking to NK. Trump just wants to be a tough guy when his life isn't on the line. 

     

  18. Just now, Carlos Danger said:

    I think it is clear the founding fathers had the idea that the right to bare arms was to stop us from falling into the tyranny a state might inflict on an unarmed masses.

    So again what law would have stopped this? 

    Ok, so your argument is that a well armed citizenry will stop the state from inflicting its' will on the people.  You live in a country where the politicians have been stealing from you for years. Have you ever seen how rich Senators are? How much wealth they amass that can't be explained by their salary? The politicians pretty much do as they please and the most heavily armed citizens in the world aren't stopping it.  

    But let's assume that you are all as heavily armed as that white asshole who just murdered 58 people and wounded 400.  Would that be enough to stop the government? It wouldn't. A tyrannical government could take out the most heavily armed civilians.

    If you really wanted to be on an equal footing, you should be arguing for the right to own nuclear weapons, gunships etc.  

     

  19. 3 minutes ago, Biggie Smails said:

    But reasearchers can't confirm that this reduction is due to the The gun laws.

     

    https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/strict-gun-laws-ended-mass-shootings-australia

    Great article.  The Government put in strict gun laws, people turned in the weapons that were outlawed. People needed to prove a need for a weapon, get thoroughly checked out to prove they were of good moral character then wait 28 days. 

    Australia had 13 mass killings in 17 years, the government implemented strict gun laws, the mass killings stopped for 20 years. 

    But they can't prove for certain that it was the cause.  

    Maybe they all found god.