
Posts posted by Highmark
-
-
-
42 minutes ago, XCR1250 said: AOL.....
....... that's still a thing?
-
Edited by Highmark
22 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: why hasn't Congress been at the minimum briefed or given the full Intel?
How do you know they haven't besides not every single person in congress is privy to every single piece of intelligence.
The question is its been about a week now that facility has been discussed its likely they removed any highly enriched uranium already. Possibly even some of the equipment.
Iran would be foolish to assume it can't be destroyed. I don't think its a stretch to assume we have satellite coverage of that facility 24/7.
-
-
17 hours ago, Crnr2Crnr said: Do we? I have no idea.
I do believe this....Israeli intelligence is some of the best in the world especially in the ME.
I know this.....Iran banned the IAEA from inspections and shortly after Israel launched its attacks.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/1164291
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/world/middleeast/un-iaea-iran-nuclear-program.html
I know this.....Hamas and Hezbollah are literally a wing of Iran and they have continued to attack Israel throughout their history.
I know this.....Iran leadership all the way to the top....not just their people constantly chant death to Israel. They do the same to us but that alone is not worthy of our involvement.
I know this....Iran is almost the last ME country that isn't ready for peace with Israel.
-
17 hours ago, Crnr2Crnr said: yeah, you should actually see and hear it!
really, what gives you that impression? the 9/11 responders was his passion project as a New Yorker.
did you give a passionate speech to Congress about the war on terror? did your Congressman? how about your president(s)?
I'll defend or support JS's actual words and actions all day long... while they say thoughts and prayers
Great you do you and I'll stick to my thoughts on the matter that he never once condemned liberal actions or reactions to things against anyone other than liberals.
-
-
3 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: this guy... same person
Jon Stewart slams Congress over benefits for 9/11 first responders
Yet John could give a shit about the men, women and families that actually fought the war on terror.....or did I miss that congressional speech.
Honestly.....I got a bit of Victims and first responders of 9/11 fatigue
-
-
Edited by Highmark
1 hour ago, Crnr2Crnr said: maybe you should watch it and see how bad it's hurts your gigantic vagina? 😉
Not going to watch it but was the right response similar to when leftist tried to kill Trump twice? How about when that leftist nutbag shot up Republicans practicing baseball in a DC park. Don't recall JS having a problem when people on the left were wishing Trump was killed or an actress was on a show holding up a bloody decapitated Trump head.
Hell CNN or MSNBC had a guy on saying they simply needed to "take Trump out."
Nobody tops the lefts violent rhetoric.
-
Edited by Highmark
Its hilarious the entire world knows about this facility.
Its even on the news about how it hasn't been hit yet.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-iran-war-fordo-nuclear-site/
-
1 hour ago, Crnr2Crnr said: If you have half a brain its not difficult to sort thru the bullshit on any media source. I'm not just talking about biased reporting but things I point out in articles/videos all the time.
Sources say....possibly.....potentially....... You get what I mean.
-
-
Edited by Highmark
Honestly....there isn't a govt in the world I really trust......now take a group of world govts and create an organization with them and I really don't trust them.
There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.”
The phrase "power begets power" means that possessing power, influence, or authority tends to lead to the acquisition of even more power.
-
8 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Well he should have blamed NATO instead of coming up with all these lame ass excuses for his attack. Yup... LANDGRAB end of story
Why in 2014 and 2022? Why hasn't Russia taken this long before? He was first President from 2000-2008?
Its almost like things happened in 2014 that started this in motion....hmmmm what could have that have been.
-
1 minute ago, Snake said: Couple Bunker Busters and wipe the dust off your shoes.
Who is gonna stop a B2?
Deed done, no dying in a war.
No one wants a Lindsay Graham war. Fortunately, that is not what we are talking about.
Risk.....losing support of your base.....not worth the reward.....setting their program back a few years and emboldening them even more as this is why we need a nuke.
-
Edited by Highmark
1 minute ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Peter the Great ..From the man himself... Is all I need to know.
The rest of what you say is just noise.
FFS dude Trump puffs himself up like that too at times.
If Putin comes out and says this invasion is a move because of NATO aggression what then? NATO takes it as an act of war on them?
Kennedy was not wrong.....if he was prove it.
-
Edited by Highmark
4 minutes ago, Highmark said: And NATO had nothing to do with pinning Russia in a corner.......
Let me guess like Deep and others you think NATO is just a "defensive organization" that just so happens to have nukes and bombers and fighter jets and tanks and.......
Face it dude you fell for the left and RINO's Russia/Ukraine rhetoric. The Ukraine war could have been avoided multiple times including going back to 2014 when the US and GB instituted regime change that was none of fucking business to get involved in.
Just now, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Nice excuse
..
At least that sounds better than the bogus Denazification they initially ran on.
Sorry nothing but a land grab as was the previous attacks
So you weren't on the side of the libtards and RINO's like Linsey Graham?
-
Edited by Highmark
Just now, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Yeah I loved Ukraine war...lmao.
I did not love how Russia went on the offensive and attacked Ukraine for the umpteenth time just for more land grab... basically admitted by Putin with his Peter the Great comparison.
And yes this is great if it delays Iran's capability for nuclear development. It's better than where we are now with 83% in enrichment. They're pretty damn close and need to be stopped. I'm not looking for a drawn out altercation. This will be quick I ran is weak
And NATO had nothing to do with pinning Russia in a corner.......
Let me guess like Deep and others you think NATO is just a "defensive organization" that just so happens to have nukes and bombers and fighter jets and tanks and.......
Face it dude you fell for the left and RINO's Russia/Ukraine rhetoric. The Ukraine war could have been avoided multiple times including going back to 2014 when the US and GB instituted regime change that was none of fucking business to get involved in.
-
Edited by Highmark
4 minutes ago, Snake said: Difference between saying Iran can't have a nuclear weapon and we will use the military to stop them.
He also campaigned on the general idea of no more people dying in wars.
I'm telling you most of MAGA will go against him on this and I didn't support him for EVERYTHING he campaigned on.
I've been very consistent in my criticism of Iran. I think they are the trouble makers of the ME......its just not our fucking responsibility.
-
-
Edited by Highmark
6 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: I don't know about that....If he Obliterates Iran, brings them to their knees and takes away their nuclear capability quickly, MAGA will have no problem with that as the end result.
Trump is running the show and I'm about as MAGA as it gets. .... A long drawn-out confrontation would definitely be detrimental But throwing a few bunker busters around with a quick victory and show of force would be similar to taking Soleimini and Baghdadi out.
No offense but you are the most war mongering RINO of the MAGA's on here. You loved you some Ukraine war as well.
Enlighten us as to what is the result of Iran being "brought to its knee's." If we don't kill off the troops the same Muslim's stay in power. Are we going to entrust the same youth to rise up and take over by revolution? The same age group that brought upon the religious zealots that have us where we are today.
I don't want Iran to have a nuke especially with religious zealots in power but we just turn back the clock a bit and they start all over with MORE desire to get one feeling MORE isolated.
In Japan and Germany US had to remain (and still is there) to literally un-brainwash the population. That simply is impossible with Islam.
-
-
Edited by Highmark
Just now, Crnr2Crnr said: maybe you need to start watching the main stream media?
Guess we will see. He throw's it all away if he gets very deeply involved in Iran and I'm not talking about boots on the ground. Absolute most he can do here is give Israel the bunker busters and planes and even that is a risk.
B-2 stealth bombers and 30,000-pound bunker busters: Why striking Iran's nuclear sites is such a difficult feat
in Current Events
Likely got updated intel from Israel.