Jump to content

Highmark

Platinum Donating Member

  • Joined

  • Last visited

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by Highmark

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    Reality is Nunes said what he learned had nothing to do with the investigation the committee was doing and had nothing to do with Russia.  

    “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked,” Nunes said. “And fourth and finally, I want to be clear, none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities or of the Trump team,” he added.

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

    well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close.

    here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? :dunno:

     

     

    10 minutes ago, Highmark said:

    Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July.

    Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee?  

    Hillary's secret server/classified email info hurt her WAY more than the DNC emails especially when they showed up on a pedophiles laptop and Comey had no choice but to look into it.   THAT is what hurt Hillary the most.   Are you claiming Russia and Trump had something to do with that? :lol:  

     

    6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

    and? why do you always counter a debate about topic a with a deflection to topic b?

     

    Follow along SnoClinger.

    You claimed they (easy to assume you meant Russia and Trump) did it right around the election which was false.   It started in July.

    My counter debate ties directly into your claim.  If other that to have the most impact on the election why did NBC wait?

    Hillary got undone by her own doing.   Her deciding not to engage parts of the American voter and her email server.   Of all the Wikileaks stuff even you guys admitted many times had relatively little to do with Hillary herself but WAY more her staff and the media.  I followed the Wikileaks stuff more than most and I can't even recall her personal emails being all that damaging.   

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

    well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close.

    here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? :dunno:

     

    Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July.

    Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee?  

    Hillary's secret server/classified email info hurt her WAY more than the DNC emails especially when they showed up on a pedophiles laptop and Comey had no choice but to look into it.   THAT is what hurt Hillary the most.   Are you claiming Russia and Trump had something to do with that? :lol:  

    3 minutes ago, JEFF said:

    Vince says they're working on it? 

    Here is the funny thing.   All these intelligence community people willing to leak that there is evidence yet they don't leak the actual evidence. :lol:  I mean a few simple documents proving it would easily destroy the Trump admin.   Does anyone think for a second that if they were available it would not have been leaked to the public already?  

    4 hours ago, DriftBusta said:

    Yes.  You list up all the examples of Republicans/Republican administrations actions that rival some of the shit Democrats have been doing for the last 8 fucking years:  sicking the IRS onto conservative groups, giving Lerner and Kostinen a pass about it, pay for play at the Clinton foundation, ignoring federal immigration laws, AG quashing investigations, being in contempt of congress, DNC rigging the election and debates, Soros groups paying protestors to beat up Trump supporters, etc..  I could go on all day.  So sick of that bullshit "one side is as bad as another".  Its nonsense and obfuscates reality.  I get the partisan hack shit, but lets get real here.  Some of you guys and your balancing acts trying to be "impartial".  Pfft.

     

    Lets see the list.  Apples to apples as Slinger would say.

    Great post. :thumb:

    Posted

    Since this seems to be a main topic here and the resident HCL's (Hillary Clit Lickers) are constantly talking about it why don't those believers start posting up actual evidence that this occurred.   It would also seem relevant to post up evidence that the Wikileaks releases actually changed voting.   I mean did the polls swing? :lol:

    No bullshit "sources tell CNN."   Actual evidence.  

    8 minutes ago, Anler said:

    Well its in "their" hands so I dont think there will be any excuse for them fucking it up. They have been talking big talk and criticizing for 8 years and Trump himself promised something "amazing" so it had better be. 

    I agree.   I would have approached the ACA differently during the campaign. 

    Just now, Cold War said:

    I keep waiting for just one reporter to go..........."UMMMM, honestly"??!!! :lol:

    When these idiots are going on their rants  about the GOP & healthcare.

    Christ, even Pelosi is weighing in........No shame whatsoever. 

    Remember all the times we've heard from the dems where are the GOP's solutions?   Well where have the dems been at fixing their own piece of shit legislation?  I've not heard one thing on fixing the ACA from them yet they often admit it has problems. :lol:  

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    24 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

    He did well with Harbaugh as his coach, again in the right system I think he can be an average to slightly above average QB in the NFL.

    Just remember I have Mike Glennon to look forward to after how many years of Jay Cuntler, it's been grim dude and it ain't getting better :lol: 

    Nope.   Not accurate enough.   NFL defenses take a year to figure a guy out then it comes down to whether or not they can be consistent with accuracy.   He might get signed but never is a #1 QB again.  Today's NFL is reading defenses, making quick decisions and delivering the ball into small window's or hitting your guys with accurate passes for YAC.  

    Just now, Snake said:

    I said all along, burn the fucker down.

    What's hilarious is the GOP is being transparent (until last night) and allowing for changes to be made.   This is how legislation is suppose to work.  The dems jammed ACA down our throats in the middle of the night in a "we have to pass it so you can see what's in it" type of deal and the MSM loved them for it.   Bizzaro world I tell ya.    

    4 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

    Who needs the MSM when you have this healthcare bill going through, no matter how it ends up I don't see it being a winner for the republicans.

    I don't disagree.   Obama and the dems gave the American people and the GOP a big shit sandwich that I don't think they can find an easy resolution too.  People can say what they want but ACA is not working.   Part of me agree's with Rand Paul.   Let it get worse for a few more years before you try and fix it.   Its not going to get any better with the status quo.   

    8 minutes ago, Anler said:

    Well I dont know how it works in Maine but around here you need probable cause to pull someone over. And cops stalking a legal business is harassment. That old guy had every right to tell those cops to fuck off. You know rights, I think we still have some... 

    Reality is there is no such thing.   They can simply claim you were driving erratically.  Nowadays they call it "making contact."  Our rights are going out the door, especially for those that don't know them.  Biggest one I see is stopping them for the licences plate light being out.      

    12 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

    the Clinton foundation has received a lot of donations, from a lot of different people. most of these donations highmark keeps referring to happened prior to Hillary even becoming SOS. there was one donation from donor A that was reported by the foundation. donor A, however, had received a donation from donor B,  which was unknown to the foundation. this was one of the rww's "smoking guns".  it was a mistake and then corrected.

    I proved to ICE yesterday that to be false regarding the Russian involved with the Uranium deal.

    As for Manafort most of that was back in 2006.   You can't see how previous money can be thought of as a quid pro quo.  Oh only for someone with Trump. :lol:  

    What about Hillary's campaign managers ties to Russia?   No problems there sno?

    2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

    this uranium one story has been debunked so many damn times yet you keep running your damn yapper about it. the donations, the time lines, the approvals that were needed, the departments involved...

     

    Not one thing that I claim on that story has ever been debunked.   Yes more than the SD was involved in the approval however that does not take away from the fact that the major players involved donated money to the Clinton Foundation.   Its also fact that she kept those donors secret from the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES after signing a letter of memorandum stating she would release all donors.  Ask yourself sno why would she keep them secret? 

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    5 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

    Highmark just one question-

    "Do you think Trump should be investigated fully to be sure the Russians had or have had financial influence in the US presidency, election or national security"?

    I simply don't have the evidence to say one way or another.  I don't have the evidence to say if the Obama admin should be investigated for spying collaterally on Trump.

    I do know what has been released in the news media is not justification for a full investigation in either case.  

    Now that I answered your question honestly please go back to the other thread and answer my question regarding the Hillary SD uranium deal.  

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    If they want to do it time to time fine but DUI enforcement is not the only responsibility of local LE.   That is the issue I have.   Whats going on on the other side of town if crooks know the cop is sitting somewhere only looking at people coming out of a bar.   

    ·

    Edited by Highmark

    9 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

    Did he keep this speech a secret and lie about it?  

     

    Actually they kept the money they received from the owners a secret.   Its right in the article.  She signed a memorandum of understand with Obama before becoming SoS that the foundation would release all donors.   She didn't release some foreign ones including the Russians. :lol:  

    I mean how can you possibly point fingers at Trump when no actual evidence has been released yet and give a pass to the Clinton's on this.   My god if Trumps foundation did this you people would be throwing yourselves from roofs.