Mileage Psycho

1 hour ago, spin_dry said:

 we all know the answer to that. 

But but but, who else will talk as stupid as Trump, IOW's they will hang on to the bitter end

Powerful statement, and spot on.

Quote

“I have watched this week’s unfolding events, angry and appalled,” Mattis writes. “The words ‘Equal Justice Under Law’ are carved in the pediment of the United States Supreme Court. This is precisely what protesters are rightly demanding. It is a wholesome and unifying demand—one that all of us should be able to get behind. We must not be distracted by a small number of lawbreakers. The protests are defined by tens of thousands of people of conscience who are insisting that we live up to our values—our values as people and our values as a nation.” He goes on, “We must reject and hold accountable those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution.” 

“Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead, he tries to divide us,” Mattis writes. “We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children.” 

5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

in South Minneapolis right now and I have told some of the ass clowns walking by to come on over if they want to chat . 

Hit em!!!

5 minutes ago, Anler said:

I like the part about him wielding a military that he dodged. Everyone is beneath him but can still serve him. LOL

Trump's a real tough guy.

5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

to you think the peopke who burnt the church understood any of it . or were they paying respect by using the pages as kindling .

zero outrage over the real crime 

There was a small fire set in the basement by some assholes, the president and the photo-op was just as stupid. Clown president.

4 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

no shit took them 4 fucking days to figure that out . well 4 days and a lot of tears and empty begging for the cameras .liberal  weakness at every level on full display  

Hey tough guy, go take a ride into the MSP and let them pussies know how you feel, man up!!

15 minutes ago, hayward said:

Maybe you're not at the right place at the right time?

12 minutes ago, Anler said:

I work from 6am to 5pm generally so if there are any shenanigans they are going to have to accomodate my schedule. 

All is quiet in the hood where my HQ is, my Superintendant was at 2900 W. Roosevelt Rd. this morning doing a layout a temp service with ComEd, badass neighborhood across the street from Douglass Park, he said the shits all good out there on the west side.

25 minutes ago, Anler said:

Sweet little post I saw today..

Spot on.

Social media news junkies....................

6 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

It’s too late for the weak leadership to do anything now.  This is a show of “look, we are doing something”.

May be interesting where this goes.   Let’s see if the use of deadly force is authorized once it is used against the national guard and LEO.   A “show” of force isn’t enough.

Your LEO's and governor are thinking 80% of the protestors are from out of state, with the additional force coming into MN today I wouldn't want to be out on the street after 8:00 pm.

7 hours ago, Zambroski said:

 #warriorswinning

They are all just punk bitches.  All of them.

You should go to Minneapolis and beat down those antifa fuckers yourself, should be a piece of cake for a self proclaimed badass such as yourself

1 hour ago, Ez ryder said:

at least he has fort brag on allert and ready to ship out . because our pathetic week leadership obvusly can't handle this . Minneapolis and MN in general this is what we get when we put weak cunts in leadership positions 

Largest deployment of law enforcement in Minnesota history, all hands on deck. What part of your weak mind doesn't understand this?

Tonight should be huge with federal forces joining Minnesota forces to beat the anarchy down.

12 hours ago, Anler said:

This is 7d chess!

For the 42% it's all about not fact checking, we know this by just reading the posts here from those who don't want to know.

I guess the strategy is to just look the other way in hopes of keeping the 42% in the dark.

Quote

 

Fox News looks the other way as US passes grim 100,000 death milestone

To begin her program on Wednesday night, Rachel Maddow walked viewers through the front pages of the nation's top news organizations. Maddow pointed out that the top headlines across the board were about the United States passing a grim milestone: 100,000 deaths from coronavirus. NYT, WaPo, CNN and others were all leading with that story, she explained to viewers.

But there was one outlier. "Just so you're aware, this is what is, in contrast, this is what is the front page for our friends at the Fox News Channel right now," Maddow said. "It's as you can see a little bit different." Indeed, above the fold, Fox was covering everything but the death toll.

"If you scroll down and scroll down and scroll down, eventually you do get — they do ultimately get to, oh yeah, 100,000 Americans dead," Maddow said. "They do get to it eventually."

Maddow's observation was not unique to Fox's homepage. The network's on-air programming Wednesday night was similar. None of its prime time shows led with the somber news regarding the death toll. Martha MacCallum, who hosts what is supposed to be Fox's go-to "straight news" program, started her show with the story regarding a student suspected of two homicides. It took her more than 50 minutes to get to the news about 100,000 dead Americans. She saved it for her last segment.

Tucker Carlson led his program with a monologue on "Big Tech censorship." Sean Hannity with live-coverage of the Minneapolis protests. And Laura Ingraham with a call to reopen the country and an attack on Dr. Anthony Fauci. Ingraham even found time for a "FARTGATE 2020" segment. (You really can't make it up.)

Like the President, whose Twitter feed focused on everything but the death toll Wednesday night, Fox largely looked away as the death toll crossed 100,000. If historians were to go back and watch Fox News on the night the country passed 100,000 deaths, they'd be forgiven if they didn't know it happened.

This is, of course, part of a larger pattern. A study by the progressive watchdog Media Matters found that "between May 11 and May 26, the coronavirus's total U.S. numeric death toll was mentioned between the hours of 8-11 p.m. on Fox only 11 times in almost 36 hours of programming." And I previously reported that Fox had one week traded in its coverage of coronavirus to go all in on the President's "OBAMAGATE" conspiracy.

It is all remarkable. We are living through what is widely considered to be one of the greatest stories in a generation, and the country's most-watched cable news network keeps putting it on the back burner.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/28/media/fox-news-coronavirus-deaths-reliable-sources/index.html

 

Trump has said that Rasmussen is the most accurate.

Quote

 

Poll: Trump Hits Lowest Rasmussen Net Approval Since 2017

President Trump on Wednesday reached his worst approval rating in over two years on Rasmussen’s daily index, with just 42 percent of respondents approving of his performance while 57 percent disapproved.

The fifteen point net disapproval reflects the bleakest picture for the president since December, 2017. Rasmussen, whose results tend to skew positively for the president, also found that 30 percent of respondents strongly approve of Trump while 47 percent who strongly disapprove, his worst rating since January 2018.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/poll-trump-hits-lowest-rasmussen-net-approval-since-2017/

 

1 minute ago, DriftBusta said:

 Breathless hoax:  Russian collusion.   

How many went to jail?  

On 5/23/2020 at 8:15 AM, Snake said:

1. Why did the Obama administration use opposition research, funded by a political organization and filled with foreign dirt, to spy on members of the Trump campaign?
2. Why was Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn unmasked by Obama’s chief of staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?
3. Why was Flynn’s identity leaked — a criminal act — to the press?
4. Why did the DOJ learn about the FBI’s interest in Flynn’s conversations with the Russian Amb. from a conversation with Obama in the Oval Office?
5. Why did James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power and Susan Rice privately admit under oath that they had no evidence of collusion while saying the opposite publicly?

On 5/19/2020 at 3:27 PM, DriftBusta said:

Just listen to the last 5 Barr press conferences for starters.  Then check out the reams of evidence that “Judicial Watch” has gotten as a result of FOI requests and lawsuits.    

I don't think this "Obamagate" has much going for it, although that could change.

Another breathless hoax by our beloved president.

Quote

 

‘Obamagate’ suffers another significant, predictable blow

A week ago, Republican senators released a list of Obama administration officials who had requested the “unmasking” of Michael Flynn’s name in intelligence reports. And it wasn’t long before President Trump’s allies picked up the ball and ran with it. Almost immediately, many of them began tying the unmaskings to the leaks of details of Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador — a situation that culminated in Flynn pleading guilty to lying to the FBI about the calls.

“One crime is certain to have been committed,” wrote conservative journalist John Solomon, “an unmasked conversation between Flynn and Russia’s ambassador to Washington was leaked to at least two media outlets.”

Fox News host Laura Ingraham added that “the practice itself — unmasking — isn’t illegal, but passing the info around for illicit purposes, leaking it to the press — oh, yes, that is illegal. And we know that occurred here.”

In a letter this week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) asked acting director of national intelligence Richard Grenell “why the list released on May 13th did not contain a record showing who unmasked General Flynn’s identity for his phone call with Ambassador Kislyak.”

Turns out there’s a very good reason the list didn’t show who unmasked Flynn’s name in that call: Because it was never masked in the first place. As The Post’s Ellen Nakashima reported Wednesday, it was the FBI, not the National Security Agency, that wiretapped Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s calls — a common and legal practice. And Flynn’s name was never redacted in its report:

“When the FBI circulated [the report], they included Flynn’s name from the beginning” because it was essential to understanding its significance, said a former senior U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive intelligence. “There were therefore no requests for the unmasking of that information.”

The upshot here is that the unmaskings have not actually been connected to the Flynn-Kislyak calls or to the leaking of information about them to the press.

The most notable leak was to Washington Post columnist David Ignatius. On Jan. 12, 2017, Ignatius broke the news of Flynn’s talks with Kislyak and raised the prospect that they had discussed the Obama administration’s recently imposed sanctions -- in potential violation of an unenforced federal law called the Logan Act. The Post eventually reported Flynn and Kislyak had in fact discussed sanctions, but Flynn lied about this to the FBI and pleaded guilty to doing so. (The Justice Department now seeks to drop this prosecution.)

In other words, breathless theories about how the unmaskings prove the Obama White House was involved in the leaks have crumbled — at least based upon what we know now.

To be clear, not everyone who has objected to the unmaskings has tied them to the Kislyak calls like this. More discerning experts and pundits have acknowledged that the list provided to senators by Grenell included no such evidence — and even acknowledged the likelihood that Flynn’s identity was never masked in the first place.

But that didn’t stop the likes of Graham from acting as though it had been. Nor did it stop Trump allies such as the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes (Calif.), from going on Fox News and lumping it all together.

“They were unmasking anyone and everyone so that they could leak information to a press that was willing to take that illegal information to build a fake, phony narrative to set up numerous people on the Trump team — not just General Flynn,” Nunes said a week ago.

Others have suggestively looked at the dates of the unmaskings in an attempt to tie them to Flynn-Kislyak calls or the leak to Ignatius.

“Now, who do you think made the unmasking requests that day?” Ingraham said last week, referring to the date Flynn and Kislyak made contact. “None other than former director of national intelligence James Clapper.”

The Wall Street Journal editorial board applied this speculative theory to Biden last week.

“Mr. Biden’s unmasking request was made on Jan. 12, 2017 — the day The Washington Post reported on the Flynn-Russia conversation,” it wrote. “Mr. Biden has some explaining to do.”

Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) echoed this idea:

Biden seems to have less explaining to do now that we know that Flynn’s name was never masked in the first place.

The revelation comes after, earlier in the week, Attorney General William P. Barr dismissed the idea of a criminal investigation of former president Barack Obama or Biden.

There is much we still don’t know here. But what has been evident from the beginning is that this alleged scandal — “Obamagate,” as Trump has called it — has been built on a whole lot of baseless suggestion and inference. Proponents are exploiting the secretive but entirely common process of unmasking (which is alien to 99.9 percent of Americans) to construct an elaborate but extremely speculative conspiracy theory.

In doing so, they have been aided by the selective release of information by Grenell and GOP senators, which provided just enough for them to inject a whiff of plausibility that this involved the Obama White House or even Biden — but never truly substantiated that allegation in the first place.

It’s always important to be circumspect with this kind of information, acknowledging there is plenty we don’t yet know that has yet to be revealed. But it’s also important not to jump to flimsy conclusions by going beyond the evidence — and rather blatantly so.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/21/obamagate-suffers-another-significant-blow/

 

5 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

Seems to me he is leading by example. 

Seems to me that he is quite concerned about having had staff around him with the Covid, FTR he has proven he doesn't know how to lead by example.

We know Trump is obese and has hypertension, is hydroxychloroquine really something he should be taking?

Just a thought for the Trumper's, it's possible if the stable genius would have more a mask and required WH staff to wear a mask he might not have had to be all worried about being in proximity to those folks.

On 5/15/2020 at 1:00 PM, DriftBusta said:

The evidence is overwhelming.  The dots connect.  Obama is the most corrupt president in our lifetimes.  What his administration did to co opt the election and weaponizing of apolitical agencies is treason.  I don’t expect that he will be tried for it, but I do expect that several people in his administration are going to be indicted and prosecuted. Maybe I’m wrong but I doubt it.

What evidence?

Please educate me  

20 hours ago, DriftBusta said:

Are you saying Trumps a fascist?  Please explain.   

Me too.  

Because the globalist cabal that are propping him up need a malleable figurehead to do their bidding.  Its gratifying however, to see that they learned nothing from the last election and that page from the playbook just doesn't work anymore.

Who is faring better under the Trump admin, the wealthy or the working class?

We know the answer

20 hours ago, jtssrx said:

I’m sure Moto will be voting for Biden

 

And you support an incestuous moron, bravo

3 minutes ago, jtssrx said:

You support the status quo. You probably voted for the mayor of Chicago and the Governor of Illinois 

Life is good JT

BTW, I can't vote for the Mayor of Chicago.

Yeah I voted for JB, the previous election in 2014 I supported Bruce Rauner to the tune that he sent me a personally signed thank you letter, Bruce was the last republican I supported.

3 hours ago, Tinker said:

Force ? He did not say or even imply Force. They will be able to give it to a lot of people very rapidly.

The guy's a dick but he did not imply force in any way shape or form

No he didn't, not even close.

The source of the "news" in the OP.

Quote

 

The Daily Stormer is an American far-right neo-Nazi, white supremacist, and Holocaust denial commentary and message board website that advocates for the genocide of Jews.^[1][2][3][4] It considers itself a part of the alt-right movement.^[5] Its editor, Andrew Anglin, founded it on July 4, 2013, as a faster-paced replacement for his previous website Total Fascism. The website also publishes its content in Spain and Latin America, Italy and Greece.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Stormer