Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Mileage Psycho

USA Contributing Member
  • Posts

    10,507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Mileage Psycho

  1. 1 hour ago, Snake said:

    R family vales say get the parent a real job so he doesn't have to suck the teat. What do you think they prefer, a blue check or a job?

    Well it appears that most folks on welfare have a job or jobs, now what?

     

     

    Quote

     

    Get a Job? Most Welfare Recipients Already Have One

    It’s poor-paying jobs, not unemployment, that strains the welfare system.

    That’s one key finding from a study by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, that showed the majority of households receiving government assistance are headed by a working adult.

    The study found that 56% of federal and state dollars spent between 2009 and 2011 on welfare programs — including Medicaid, food stamps and the Earned Income Tax Credit — flowed to working families and individuals with jobs. In some industries, about half the workforce relies on welfare.

    “When companies pay too little for workers to provide for their families, workers rely on public assistance programs to meet their basic needs,” said Ken Jacobs, chairman of the university’s Center for Labor Research and Education and one of the report’s authors.

    More than half of front-line fast-food workers receive some form of government assistance.

    Pay for those workers has received significant attention recently. Fast-food workers have held several protests and strikes over the past year. And earlier this month, McDonald’s said it would raise pay for 90,000 of its lowest-paid employees at company-operated stores.

    Among other fields, 48% of home-care workers and 25% of part-time college faculty also receive government assistance.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/04/13/get-a-job-most-welfare-recipients-already-have-one/

     


     

     

    • Like 1
  2. My Dad rented 1969 Mercury 220's, technically the first sled I rode was a 69 Ariens as that is what my Dad first started to rent but they all broke down the first day of use, the dealer took them back and a deal was done for the Mercs. The first sled I bought and owned was a used 77 Yamaha Exciter I bought in 1984.

    1969_MERCURY_220E_STEVE_5_6A_PP387.jpg

     

    Look I'm wearing a Yamaha jacket LOL

    yamaha.jpg

    • Like 1
  3. 3 hours ago, Capt.Storm said:

    Yeah it's a false economy right now. 

    But hey Greenspan did keep inflation super low with his rates...course Barry helped also by keeping job growth low.

     

    You know small business are the back bone of the economy though right?  

    What's false Cappy? Is it the guys on this website buying new trucks, sleds, homes, etc....?

  4. 1 hour ago, 1jkw said:

    The information given to Powell was known to be false before he went to the UN.

    Powell said he was duped, Rumsfeld said Powell was not aware the intel was false, and Powell at the time believed it to be true.

    Powell sat for days in meetings with people who knew it was false and kept it from him.

    There are plenty of youtube vids of Rumsfeld stating that Powell believed the intel to be true.

     

    Powell was pissed off about being duped, it did not sit well with him.

    • Like 1
  5. 18 hours ago, Biggie Smails said:

    I'm a member at both places without issue.....not sure why there are those on both sites acting like little kids.

    :lame:

    I'm a member there too, but I can only do one fuckoff website at a time so I chose the familiar FS, plus the good news is my time on the WWW has dropped since Rob burned down the old FS site and that's a good thing :hi:

    • Like 1
  6. 7 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

    What a bunch of shit.  "Heavily massaged".  :lmao:

    Fact is all presented with information had and did do their own information gathering.  You think the dems told the reps "Hey, yeah, you guys do the homework and we'll just sit back and agree with it all."  Laughable.  "War" was decided by each corner for their own selfish gains one way or the other. Why on earth do Dems think the reps are a bunch of war mongering harbingers of death?  That's just stupid rhetoric turned into nice bales of hay for the sheep feeding.  

    And the "U.N."  Yes, by all means, let's bring them into any retarded conversation and pretend those water and food waiters in the war zone actually have any power enforce ANYTHING and aren't operating under a guise of their own little 2nd and 3rd world dictatorship.  AWESOME!  Last encounter I had with the UN goobers almost resulted in them all being shot in the head multiple times and having their vehicles commandeered.

    The United States Democratic Party and the United Nations; a partnership protecting the world from the world within our world of worlds.  :lol:

    The Executive branch presented the info to the Legislative branch, it was pile of contrived bullshit and we know because.............

    WMD2.gif

     

    Now here is some interesting facts.

    SAL.ca.rice-powell-bush-cheney.war-crimi

     

  7. 6 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

    Do you think we'd have been over there jerking around without the consent and support of the democrats?  Do you know how government works?  Or are you one that sits and cries and finds ways to blame the other side...from whatever side you sit on.  Our government has been duping us since it's inception, and a larger government will dupe us even more...as it has been with our "leader".  "Helping the middle class."  What a load of shit.  

    And I am pretty far from a "right winger". Both extremes of each side hold the most idiotic sheep we have in our country.  And those two sides are the majority of the population.  But if I had to do one or the other, after a complete full frontal labodomy, I'd have to at least see that the republicans create wealth and wealth creates jobs.  Disproportionately?  Yes.  But at less they create jobs.  Dems create wealth too, but only within government offices.  After those pockets are lined, "distribution" will keep the dem voters "happy".

    So, while it's taken me years to finally realize this, I can work my life and finances to take advantage of every loophole and advantage both sides seem to think is best to keep their voting sheep in line.  And it laugh every time I do it.  Republicans make opportunities in the private sector, dems create opportunities within the government run programs.  Know who can't take advantage of either very well?  Folks that are on someone else's payroll.  And the worst off are those on someone else's payroll that are actually working during large government admin years.  The programs being instituted by their leaders aren't designed to help them.  It's comical but I actually am allowed to put more money in my pocket during a Dem run government.  But really, all I am doing is putting that unpaid portion on the next generation....but that seems to be "OK" by them.  So, :koo-koo:

     

     

    The democrats and the UN were presented with intelligence reports that were heavily massaged to get us into an Iraq war that the Bush neo-cons lusted for.

    mirror_uk_cover2_.jpg

     

     

  8. Well now that big oil is buying into the climate change thing do you think that your thoughts of climate change being false might change now?

    The whole story is at the link, European oil companies have come to grips with the idea that the energy business is going to change because of climate change, and now investors are demanding that Exxon does something before it becomes the next Kodak. 

     

     

    Quote

     

    Exxon Investors Seek Assurance as Climate Shifts, Along With Attitudes

    By CLIFFORD KRAUSS and JOHN SCHWARTZMAY 23, 2016

    HOUSTON — Exxon Mobil has been under pressure for over a year to explain its handling of climate change issues in the past. Now the company faces new pressure to explain its future, particularly how it will change in response to a warming world.

    At the company’s planned annual meeting on Wednesday in Dallas, shareholders will vote on a resolution to prod Exxon Mobil to disclose the risks of climate change to its business.

    Such resolutions have been floated before, and they typically do not pass. But there is a growing chorus of investors, many of them large institutional shareholders, who say they are worried that Exxon Mobil, the largest publicly traded energy company in the world, is not adequately preparing for tighter times if countries start acting on the pledges they made last December as part of the Paris climate change accord.

    Exxon Mobil, for example, projects that global demand for oil will keep growing — by just over 13 percent from today, to 109 million barrels of oil a day by 2040.

    But the International Energy Agency’s projections include one situation where demand could drop by 22 percent, to 74 million barrels a day by 2040, if measures are put in place to keep global warming at levels that, while still dangerous, could avoid the most devastating consequences.

    The shareholder resolution calls for Exxon Mobil to publish an annual assessment of impacts of various climate change policies, including ones that would lead to the steep drops foreseen in the most severe energy agency’s forecast. Another resolution calls for the company to give shareholders a bigger say over governance.

    Foreign energy companies have been more receptive to such resolutions. Last year, even before the Paris agreement was completed, several large European oil companies, including Royal Dutch Shell, Statoil of Norway and BP accepted resolutions that were similar or virtually the same as those facing Exxon Mobil and Chevron.

    Those companies, which are based in countries where the governments and public opinion are demanding new climate change initiatives, have pledged to seek renewable energy opportunities.

    Statoil even acknowledged that it may, in fact, end up leaving some fossil fuels in the ground. ”Probably there will be assets stranded, yes, because the costs of CO2 doesn’t make them attractive,” said Bjorn Otto Sverdrup, Statoil’s senior vice president for sustainability.  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/exxon-investors-seek-assurance-as-climate-shifts-along-with-attitudes.html?version=meter+at+2&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com%2Fen-us%2Fnews%2Fus%2Ffor-obamas-9-bedrooms-and-space-for-secret-service%2Far-BBtuzlB&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=RelatedCoverage&region=EndOfArticle&pgtype=article&_r=0

     

     

  9. 5 minutes ago, ckf said:

    Love the old pics. I wish I had backed up the photos on my older computers before they kicked the bucket :wall:

    I lost about 5 years of pics when one of my PC's shit the bed  :wall:  Carbonite now!

     

    A wet heavy snow stuck.....ugh

    91 jag.jpg

     

    Time for some beer, venison salami, cheese and crackers.

    scan0001.jpg

     

    The little guy in the pic above is now the guy with the beard below.IMG_3434 (1) (2).JPG

     

  10. 12 hours ago, Sal Rosenberg said:

     

    Yeah , I think it was like 19 hours or so .   It was nothing that we planned , it just came about as we were having breakfast around 9 am in Greenville .    

    " Waddya wanna do today" ?

    " I duuno , I'm full of oil though... you?"

    " Yeah , I'm full .   Wanna go to FT Kent the long way, we ain't nevah been there before?"

    " Yeah.  Yeah , that sounds like fun ... get the check and let's roll "

    :bc:

    Damn Ron, that's one hell of a day! We've discussed doing a 600 miler but at this stage of the game I don't have the desire, now I like to get an early start an roll into town at around 5:00 so I can get settled in and get a Crown on the rocks in my hands, the savages I ride with always like to get into town right before the restaurant closes LOL

  11. In the rain we are checking into customs St. Joseph Island, Ontario February 2001, it was an epic day 2 of our ride around Superior; we would soon discover that the North Channel was a mess with lots of ugly ice with water on top of it and the tree line had been blown out by heavy winds. The day started out around 38*F in Cedarville Michigan and by the time we were 50 miles south of Chapleau we were in frigid whiteout conditions, we arrived in Chapleau at 9:30 and the clerk at Aux Trois Moulins not only tells me it's now -36F but that the town is booked, I told her that was alright as we would just sleep in the lobby...they found a room for the four us to pile into :bong:

    customs.jpg

    • Like 2
  12. 4 minutes ago, Highmark said:

    Sure but its funny to hear how we are not spending enough on infrastructure.  

    48,000 miles of Interstate, 158,000 miles of US Route Highway, and overall there are 4,000,000 miles of roads in this country.....and you saw 2,200 miles....

  13. 428 miles Chapleau Ontario to Longlac Ontario in early February 2002, we had 300+ miles on the clock when we were fueling in Manitouwadge at 3:00 in the afternoon, and well don't you know it's only another 100 miles or so to Longlac....... Oh fuck not only is it 100 miles of riding thru no-mans land it had not been groomed or signed yet, but there were some groomer flags and we could see that two sleds had been through going north, and when we reached the point of no return fuel wise and we were discussing whether to press on or return to Manitouwadge we see the two sleds whose tracks we had seen in the areas that were not windblown heading south, the info we got was huge as there was a point 40 kilometers north we would hit a road and would need to turn right and then go right again about 200 meters down the road, by the time we got to that road it was good and dark and we would never have seen or known which way to go at that road.

    Any how we got into Longlac around 9:00 just in time to get a frozen pizza in the motel bar :fry:

    Had a 411 mile day Chibougamau to LaSarre in 2000, and more 300+ mile days than I can count.

     

    The crew on the C-101D east of Chapleau a couple of days later, we had three 2002 ZR 800's on that trip and one 2001 ZL 550

    east of chapleau.jpg

    • Like 1
  14. WOW

    Quote

     

    Poll: Clinton and Sanders in dead heat in California  

     

    Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are virtually deadlocked in California, the biggest prize of the 2016 Democratic presidential primary season, according to a new poll.

    The survey, conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California, finds Clinton with only a small lead over Sanders, 46 percent to 44 percent, among likely voters in the Democratic primary next month.

    Story Continued Below

     

     

     

    The poll also shows a majority of Republican primary voters will cast their ballots for Donald Trump, who is joined on the ballot with four of his one-time rivals for the GOP nomination. And, in the closely watched all-party primary to replace retiring Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, two Democrats are poised to advance to the general election.

     

    California looms largest in the Democratic presidential race, however: Clinton is likely to clinch the nomination on the evening of June 7 — factoring in the expressed preferences of unpledged superdelegates — even before polls close in California. But a victory over Sanders in California later that night could ratify Clinton’s nomination in the minds of many voters.

     

    A Sanders win, on the other hand, creates an awkward situation for Clinton, who could be celebrating being dubbed the “presumptive nominee” even as she loses the nation’s largest state — and one of its most diverse.

     

    The PPIC poll shows the race breaking along familiar lines. Sanders holds a large advantage among younger voters — leading 66 percent to 27 percent among voters under age 45 — while Clinton leads, 59 percent to 28 percent, among voters 45 and older.



    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/poll-clinton-and-sanders-in-dead-heat-in-california-223580#ixzz49moT3fG0 
    Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...