Catman

22 hours ago, motonoggin said:

Those guys go there to have their worldview reinforced and confirmed, not challenged. That's why when someone upsets their little mutual ball scrubbing party, they pile on.

Dave is just the whipping boy. I think he enjoys it.

No idea what this belly pan site is and don't care if that is how it is.  I signed up here soley for the opposing view points.  I happen to disagree with the majority here but need to keep learning about other perceptions to be able to frame my own and find  a the truth.  Free speech and rationale discussion is the only way to solve issues.

Been following this professor from the university of Toronto; Jordan Peterson after hearing him on Rogans podcast. He's a fucking lightening bolt everyone needs to listen to.

3 hours ago, 02sled said:

Would you like to show where you get the number of 21,000 being government sponsored from.

The Liberals’ pledge was clear – they had committed in their platform to accept 25,000 Syrian refugees through government sponsorship by the end of 2015. Refugees and Citizenship Minister John McCallum pushed back the original deadline by two months to the end of February, 2016.

You're suggesting that 17,000 are privately sponsored. I would like to see that number from a credible source.

I'm far from a bigot and have friends from varying ethnic backgrounds. One of my closer friends is from Somalia and one of the nicest people you would want to meet as are his family. The last person I hired was originally from Sudan... so much for your bigot assumption. The difference is they arrived here legally.

What I disagree with is those that enter the country illegally rather than comply with immigration laws and procedures, then the Canadian government handing over more tax payer money to these people than they do to Canadian born citizens in need.

Google it just like I did dummy

16 hours ago, 02sled said:

What are you on. Trudopes 25000 were not privately sponsored with a few minor exceptions from small groups such as churches . I said they can get $25k federal money and according to a immigration Canada spokesman that is accurate 

Actually we are both wrong.

Thee have been 38,000 Syrian refugees admitted to Canada since Nov 2015 of those 21,000 were government assisted, the remainder were privately sponsored.

Historically most refugees are privately sponsored, and stats show they fair far better than government assisted in the long run.

You need to take your bigot glasses off and look at things objectively.  Too late for you most likely, you're doomed to a life of bitching and moaning and doing nothing about it.

2 hours ago, 02sled said:

And what did those 25,000 refugees Trudope hustled in get? Where does it say that a REFUGEE has to register in advance for the program. If they walk across the border and declare they are a refugee you're suggesting they get treated differently than any other refugee and are left to fend for themselves essentially.

There are only so many government assisted spots and even if you were to be provided government assistance it is variable.  Your assertions are simply incorrect and based on your own preconceived bigotry.

Most refugees including the Syrians were privately sponsored.

11 minutes ago, 02sled said:

BS Dave, You're wrong. At least according to a spokesperson for Citizenship and Immigration Canada ... those 25,000 that Trudope hustled in a little over a year ago were sponsored for a year by the Federal government. Government-assisted refugees get help through the federal Resettlement Assistance Program.

That support is generally available for up to a year. The maximum amount provided is $25,000 per family. That includes a one-time start up payment to help refugees establish a household in Canada, as well as monthly income support, a spokesperson for Citizenship and Immigration Canada said. 

Citizenship and Immigration Canada estimates that an individual in Ontario would receive roughly $2,065 in a one-time start-up allowance, to cover things such as basic household needs, furniture, winter clothing and telephone installation if a landline is chosen.

That is a seperate program, one must qualify for ahead of time.  Dave is correct.

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

How are you going to measure those things?  When they improved under Obama you either claimed it had nothing to do with the Presdient or argued that the numbers were fudged. 

 

Nailed it.

Just like the unemployment numbers now are great but 3 months ago they were fake.  Such hypocrisy

46 minutes ago, 02sled said:

Give it up Catman... you're an idiot. The only place that you can throw money around freely like you believe is in government. You know like the Ontario government. Pay a bonus to a contractor for sub-standard work and then pay the contractor yet again when to fix things when their work falls apart prematurely. What part of government do you work for. That's the only place you can learn to be that fiscally irresponsible.

You would have to be totally incompetent moron to believe she should renege on the legal contracts. I'd be fine with you admitting you are incompetent in business.

100% off topic post because you've been owned like the slave you are.  

I have zero issue with companies making goods over seas and selling them to their countrymen.  

WhatI have issue with is peopke like you gnoring the blatent hypocrisy of suggesting it's bad and then continuing to do the exact same thing with zero regard for making changes yourself.  

Hi us with another 1000 word essay that is completely irrelevant to the topic in 1.    2.    3..........

5 hours ago, Skidooski said:

Start making sense for once. Maybe the use of more then one word replies could help. I doubt it but maybe you should try none the less.

Only 1 word necessary.  Waste of time to run around the obvious with dummies like you.  

Enough of this shit.  We know, now let's change it.

15 minutes ago, 02sled said:

So you believe that they should just walk away from existing legal contracts and pay massive penalties getting nothing in return. Keep on proving how stupid you are.

Fuck you're clueless.

I'd be fine with an acknowledgement of the hypocrisy and a plan to own up to it.  

Zero issue with a baby step approach and it will never happen because these people are greedy power hungry sociopaths and you've bought into it like a good little slave.

2 minutes ago, 02sled said:

You truly are delusional. Of course there are large scale producers in the US. Do they have lots of unused capacity in their facilities, equipment and staff. No. If a business has lots of unused capacity it's poor planning and management. You truly don't have any business sense. Excess capacity costs money without a return.

Yap yap yap.

Not 1 word from the Trump's to even look at producing some of their goods in the USA and here you are prophecising on capacity and long term deals.   You don't get it because you have bought into it hook line and sinker.

Just own your hypocrisy and move on.  There is only 1 side here, it's obvious and it's been obvious since day 1 of the campaign.  Re: Maga hats made in China.

3 minutes ago, 02sled said:

Wrong... read back in the topic... what I first asked was should she renege on existing legally binding contracts or see them through to fulfillment and look for domestic alternatives during that time frame. If you were running a business would you renege on the contracts? I don't think so. My money says there are minimally substantial penalties for canceling the contract or in the case of many contracts you have to pay the full value of the contract regardless.

I'm sure glad you're not running any business I'd be associated with if you would try and walk away from a contract like that.

Reneg how about own the shit you say.  

Zero ethics and total hypocrisy.  You support that.

20 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Trump played by the rules that the politicians made to be competitive.  Now he's the president and has vowed to change the rules.  See if you can wrap your brain around that reality.

The reality is simple: do as I say not as I do.

There will never be tariffs, and neither his daughters brand nor his own brands will ever be made in America.

It was populist propogandist rhetoric and you bought it along with all the other bullshit.

That is the reality.

1 hour ago, 02sled said:

Okay genius... where in corporate North America are there factories, equipment and people sitting idle to be able to instantly pick up and absorb the production capacity of the Chinese factories.     It is possible to ramp up over time but it all takes time, a lot of time. Build the factories, acquire and set up the production equipment then hire and train the people. 

Are you suggesting there is no large scale garment producers in the USA? :Lol:.  Totally fucking clueless.

America is #3 for cotton production, to a point where even Chinese producers are utilizing it.

They have never once even remotely suggested production would move to the USA.

Quite simply They are hypocrites, and you're a fool.

1 hour ago, 02sled said:

Mental midget.... there is capacity but no where near enough to even put a dent in absorbing the quantities currently made in China....

 

For ALL garments purchased in the US, certainly but not for 1 presidents daughters clothing line...

They are total fucking hypocrites and so are you for defending them.  Own it

5 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

Well...yeah...he's a politician so.....

Thanks for stating the obvious yet again.

HYPOCRIT

1 minute ago, Skidooski said:

They really are a confused bunch. It's like their brains need to be purged and rebooted.

4 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

He forgot already.  He's just practicing his liberal policy of disagreeing to disagree about anything that disagrees with his disagreement.

 

Morons.

There is capacity in US manufacturing. To suggest she couldn't make her clothes in the USA is ridiculous.  She chooses not to in order to maximize profits.   She and her father are total hypocrites, and you're just fine with that. Truly  Pathetic

http://www.apparelsearch.com/america.htm

5 minutes ago, 02sled said:

The point is mono, the products are being bought and right now where in North America are you going to find a company with the capacity to take on that scale of production. It doesn't exist 

Wrong

Where are these terms "banned"?  What Clown show

1 minute ago, Sleepr2 said:

Libtards like yo have been saying for years that Bush started an illegal war, and ignoring the lefts involvement. , are as much of a Liar as McLiar and Timeshare?  

Uh huh.

I know the history, pretty obvious you don't.  You don't seem to know much about anything actually.  Pathetic

2 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

But bush started an illegal war all onvhis own according to libtards,,, 

Please share with us the actual history.  We're all ears...

2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

what would they have done with illegally obtained data? 

Exactly.

22 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

Trump is just your average realtor with a fat bank account, nothing more. He will say whatever comes to mind to prove whatever point he's trying to make and it doesn't matter if its true or not, he doesn't even think about it. Later IF he is called on it at all, he will deflect, backpedal or outright lie. Its extremely common behavior among realtors. The only difference with Trump, he's very good at it.

He is awful at it.  People are just really really stupid

Lets be clear here: Trump insists Obama wire tapped his house but no chance Putin bugged his Moscow hotel room....