-
Posts
11,419 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by xtralettucetomatoe580
-
-
4 minutes ago, Zambroski said:
He's trying to burn it all down. And good for him. But again, he's not doing him self any great favor within his own party of career politicians who spend half their time figuring out how to keep their jobs.
And you are right Vince, why is he waiting until now? This is something A LOT of Americans can get behind. Him being the Non-partisan, outsider pain in the ass will change things down the road. I think they already have.
Or, it's "Snookie vs. Kanye" 2020. Which one represents what party? Doesn't matter.
I hope we're gonna see a third/fourth party picking up some real momentum the next few years.
Not unless money gets out of politics. And the media gets held accountable for their blatant two party bias.
-
3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:
He could have led with that, a strong border without calling broad brushing Mexicans as rapists and murderers, rallies with out talking about punching protesters, debates without the insults, not going after Ted Cruz's family, etc, etc.....
Yep. He is a certified megalomaniac. No way around it.
-
7 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:
but then again, i'm sure a couple of dipshits on fsce no more about the laws than the experts anyone wanna place a bet what they're doing is legal?
“Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal.”
You keep opening me up to post that. Legal gray areas. I wonder who wrote those laws? Oh yeah people like Hillary who need that blood bag to feast on to win an election.
-
4 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:
He would have been crushed, free college would have been a killer.
Sure. But he would be hit on policy not everything else the other two have been. How long until the media gets bored with critiquing policy and no dirty laundry for the parasites to feast on? A week?
-
The dumb shit is too ego driven to have led with this? He would be running her over right now if he stuck to this. To what he knew. He knows lobbying and money. He would have beat her to death with it. Shit Bernie might have voted for him if he stuck to just this shit. But instead we have some bronzed retard who finally finds time to throw in some 2 minute soundbite about policy in over a years worth of useless rhetoric.
That being said, it is spot on right...
- 2
-
8 minutes ago, motonoggin said:
Don't bother. The cocktail liberal can't critically read.
-
That’s because, the group says, it does not plan to spend money to run ads. Instead, the PAC intends to use its website and social media platforms to counter claims made about Clinton. Jeeze I wonder what is more important in this election... Internet use or TV ads... I guess you don't have to be a Sherlock Holmes to figure that out do you, ya dumb fuck...
Oh but wait there is more to help dilute the lines between acceptable and unacceptable. They can team up and funnel money amongst themselves. BRILLIANT DEDUCTION WATSON! Seriously how much more do I need to slap you the fuck around? Can you read?
In July, the New York Times reported that the super PAC would team with Priorities USA Action, another pro-Clinton super PAC, to create a fundraising committee called American Priorities ’16. “Under the agreement, 20 percent of what gets raised through American Priorities ’16, for gifts of up to $1 million, will go to Correct the Record; the remaining 80 percent will go to Priorities USA. For gifts of $1 million or more, $200,000 would go to Correct the Record, and the rest to Priorities USA,” the Times wrote.
“Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal.”
-
5 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:
Sanders is a socialist who ran as an independent for his whole political career, and being a socialist that didn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning the GE why would the DNC have any desire to see Sanders lead the the party ticket?
Neither Trump or Clinton have great morals, Trumps thin skin is the deal breaker for many.
Hillary's blatant lies and pandering are a deal breaker for many. So here we are, at a turing point in which the two worst possible scenarios are laid in front of us. Somehow there is a winner? If you have no ethics, you don't deserve to be our President. The "she is better than him" or vice versa argument is for weak minded people who need to reevaluate what being an American is supposed to mean, and what being a morally sound human should be. But all I hear from the crowd is you are being too idealistic, sonny. God forbid we expect more.
-
5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:
no research ar anything anymore eh? ya see it, ya pass it on, and everyone eats it up. you're no different than the rw nutjobs in here. how disappointing.
LOL DID YOU READ WHAT YOU POSTED!???!!! What a fucking idiot. It is pure bullshit collusion and moving the line in the sand workarounds for PACs. Go ahead, pull out the critical thinking cap and re-read your article from your source.
And since you missed it from earlier, the point and moral of the story... You cocktail liberals are a worthless bunch. Just as bad as the other side. Grab a spine.
“Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal.”
- 1
-
First this, next he will be calling Snowden a traitor. Cant trust Bhen and anything he says.
-
If only the old forum survived. Must be 1000 posts with Bhen bashing 600s. Just like Hillary Clinton, a fucking flip flopper.
-
$700K worth of bets... A real powerhouse lolololol. Go get your pills from the nurse and take a nap you old dumb fuck.
-
5200 troops? Momo this is what you are upset about? Lol that is not even a full Brigade...
-
Shut-er down OT. Bhen ripped his throat out before he could even take a breath.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Mileage Psycho said:
What did they exactly do to "black ball" Bernie the Independent who conveniently became a Democrat in 2015, and then reverted to being an Independant in July 2016.
Bernie Sanders is a big boy who played the game and understands the game. BTW you don't see Sanders whining and crying about losing to a woman
Bernie Sanders had the full weight of the DCCC against him so they could place who they wanted in the election. What else do you have to do to consider it election rigging?
At the end of the day Hillary and her army of lawyers backed by a Democrat president, will not be convicted of shit. Too much potential damage to the party that I bet they would sacrifice Obama at this point rather than have her shoulder the weight of her actions. Don't kid yourself Vince, I know Hillary would be "better" for the status quo and everything would be business as usual, but she is in no way fit to run this country from a moral standpoint. I don't think I need to throw in neither is Trump, but I will anyway so you can't say I am on some Trump bandwagon.
If you don't vote by this, you have wasted your vote.
“Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal.”
(King of the Liberals, Aldo Leopold.... Oh how far the Liberal ideology has fallen since men like him.)
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:
Conspiracy against democracy?? Discussing strategy is now a conspiracy?
Silencing the collective voices or a large portion of the population by black balling Bernie sure would qualify in my opinion. I think the author has some valid points, but it is hard to say morally corrupt behavior to expose morally corrupt behavior is really the worst thing occurring. I would argue the morally corrupt behavior being exposed takes the win on that one.
-
Having issue with wikileaks stealing and what is actually written in those emails are two different things. The fact conspiracy against the very fabric of a working democracy are shown in those emails is another in all its own. At what point do we draw the line is a very good question. Do we disregard/justify the theft at a certain line in the sand that is crossed based upon what is truly in those emails? That is an important question that the author does not bring forth.
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, Mainecat said:
please block me.
They really need to block you from access to the inter webs at the old folks home. You are embarrassing yourself...
- 1
-
How does Obama even give the ok now to prosecute? He dug himself such a hole by not prosecuting 6 months ago... Now he is openly supporting blatant corruption, or ruining his legacy in the eyes of the Dems by letting Trump walk in to the White House. I would pity him, but he made his bed by wheeling and dealing with Hillary. I don't understand how you can break the law to this extent and not be prosecuted as Hillary has. I am ashamed for my own country. We get Trump because Hillary is an undisputed criminal and Obama does the right thing, or we get Hillary who is an undisputed criminal because a sitting President buried criminal charges on her for politics.
-
Lol poor MC is really going senile... Hopefully someone tucked him into bed last night or he might have wound up wandering around the retirement center.
- 1
-
25 minutes ago, Mainecat said:
Can you guarantee those hacked e-mails are real?
interview summaries?
Can the sexual assault claims against Trump be guaranteed as real? 99% of the claims made in this election can't be substantiated, yet somehow this now matters? How do you suck air in and chew on a crayon all at the same time through your mouth?
- 1
-
That was adorable.
- 1
-
Lol it keeps getting better, but just talking about grabbing pussy is more news worthy.... Shameful
-
3 minutes ago, motonoggin said:
Why the edit? Lolz...
Meh.. I would prefer prison than execution.
Greg Gutfeld: The guilty sins of WikiLeaks and our wicked approval
in Current Events
Posted
Do they though? I heard very few Dems who said they didn't like Bernie, just though he was not good enough to beat Trump. Not many who outright didn't like him.