spin_dry Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 ted cruz....he embodies everything that the republican party stands for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: right. so it's essentially robbing peter to pay paul. yet momo cannot see this. so it is ok if it funds things like social services or new jets for Harry and Nancy to fly around in but a raciest wall is where u draw the line ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-sac-police-asset-forfeiture-rules-20160610-snap-story.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 14 minutes ago, Momorider said: Guess what you moron you have to have your day in court, you cant keep your shit before its settled that its how shit works wrong again momo , is there anything you have ever been right about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/Civil+Asset+Forfeiture Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 http://personalliberty.com/another-civil-forfeiture-horror-story/ no conviction and assets stolen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 54 minutes ago, Anler said: Its the users who are paying for it. why is those that use the most government pay them the least amount Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted April 25, 2017 Author Share Posted April 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: http://dailysignal.com/2015/09/29/4-startling-forfeiture-abuse-stories/ https://www.aclunc.org/article/read-stories-civil-asset-forfeiture-victims https://www.techdirt.com/blog/?tag=asset+forfeiture http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/civil-forfeiture/ http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-10/civil-asset-forfeiture-ruining-lives-while-failing-stop-crime cum slurping know nothing momo goes down again 37 minutes ago, Momorider said: FAKENEWSBIPOLARHOOKNOSE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/02/take_the_money_and_run.html the owner must prove his innocence or lose his property, even if he's never charged with an underlying crime. In most jurisdictions, seized cash and the proceeds from the auctioned property go back to the police departments and prosecutors' offices responsible for the seizure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 all fake news huh momo??? dumbest motherfucker on the internet proving it once again 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/05/the-glaring-injustice-of-civil-asset-forfeiture/392999/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) http://listverse.com/2015/06/29/10-egregious-abuses-of-civil-asset-forfeiture/ In the United States, law enforcement agencies have the power to seize the assets of those suspected of criminal activity. On its face, this seems somewhat reasonable. However, the threshold for suspicion of criminal involvement is perilously low and allows law enforcement agencies to abuse the power afforded through civil forfeiture. Many innocent citizens have had their property seized as a result, and the following instances of civil forfeiture abuse are particularly egregious. Edited April 25, 2017 by f7ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted April 25, 2017 Author Share Posted April 25, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/02/take_the_money_and_run.html the owner must prove his innocence or lose his property, even if he's never charged with an underlying crime. In most jurisdictions, seized cash and the proceeds from the auctioned property go back to the police departments and prosecutors' offices responsible for the seizure. BULLFUCKINGSHIT ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 I for 1 could give 2 shits how they pay for the fucking thing . just build it and fund the surveillance of it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/30/the-7-most-egregious-examples-of-civil-asset-forfeiture/ poor momo , so sad...so stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Just now, Ez ryder said: I for 1 could give 2 shits how they pay for the fucking thing . just build it and fund the surveillance of it that is because you are a fucking moron 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 https://www.policemisconduct.net/explainers/civil-asset-forfeiture/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted April 25, 2017 Author Share Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Momorider said: BULLFUCKINGSHIT ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat the 5th 6th and 14th amendment of the constitution say you are a brain dead clueless no mind ignorant sack of shit Bipolarhooknose Edited April 25, 2017 by Momorider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 oh look .....momo ....when faced with incontrovertable evidence and owned again....reverts to posting some bullshit repeatedly that proves nothing in the argument. Color me shocked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: that is because you are a fucking moron no I have said all along I don't give a shit if mexico flips the bill or not build the fucking wall and electrify the thing if need be . I am sorry if u don't find it offensive that around 500000 to 800000 people are sneaking in a yr but I do .we are country with borders and if we are going to be a open border society fine lets do it . but then we can not be a welfare state and that faucet must stop immediately because no matter how much u want both U can not have both . that can not even be disputed it will not work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted April 25, 2017 Author Share Posted April 25, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: oh look .....momo ....when faced with incontrovertable evidence and owned again....reverts to posting some bullshit repeatedly that proves nothing in the argument. Color me shocked its is all about the law you clown Edited April 25, 2017 by Momorider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, Momorider said: its is all about the law you clown you cant spell most 2 syllable words let alone understand any part of any law....you fucking retard. I gave you countless examples proving you wrong and still you cant admit it. What a useless waste of bandwith you are.....such a pathetic know nothing troll ballsack was dead on about you years ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 5 minutes ago, f7ben said: https://www.policemisconduct.net/explainers/civil-asset-forfeiture/ just so we have this straight U don't think the fed should be able to seize the assets of guys like Tom Petters Ken Starr or Bernie" Madoff the second they slap the cuffs on them? yeah and I am the Moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: you cant spell most 2 syllable words let alone understand any part of any law....you fucking retard. I gave you countless examples proving you wrong and still you cant admit it. What a useless waste of bandwith you are.....such a pathetic know nothing troll ballsack was dead on about you years ago so angry now days. did they put duct tape over your glory hole at the truck stop ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.