Jump to content

Keith Curtis Dominates Again


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
36 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

I was there a week later and only saw it from the bottom, that was enough to give me an idea of just how steep it was.

Honestly with as incredible as the sleds are the steepness isn't the only issue...its staying within the gates on something that steep.   Hell I'd give her a rip straight up it.  :lol:  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

The catalyst ran in the 900 class and lost to the poo. no imagination needed

The catalyst had an un fair advantage with the new 600 and the competition couldn’t compete with it in the 900 class. They made them pull the 600 and put the 800 in it to run the 900 class. That slowed the sled down so much polaris stomped all over it  

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Sled came out without a scratch. broke tj

he RCA make end off of my heated shield cord though in the tumble. Still hurts but no bruising so luckily, no broken bones.

My guess is you were standing, that's what I was doing but I did not get donkey kicked off.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, HSR said:

You need to know your limits dude. 35 mph !!!!! Whoa , slow da fuck down. You're not on a Catalyst :news: 

Could not see any contours on the lake due to the cloudiness sky's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Badger** said:

My guess is you were standing, that's what I was doing but I did not get donkey kicked off.  

Was sitting. Like the only berm left from the races a couple weeks earlier. If I was standing, probably would have tossed me over the sled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thread goes from the massive amounts of talent and sledding skills of Keith Curtis to 2 geriatrics discussing death defying  35 mph crashes.

Moral of the story :Speed limit for retards is 34 Mph.

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Could not see any contours on the lake due to the cloudiness sky's.  

"cloudiness sky's."  Maybe get checked for a concussion.  

Scratch that.  Just looked it up.  You need a brain in order to get a concussion.  

Edited by jdsky
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HSR said:

Thread goes from the massive amounts of talent and sledding skills of Keith Curtis to 2 geriatrics discussing death defying  35 mph crashes.

Moral of the story :Speed limit for retards is 34 Mph.

Next up in geezers corner... hand signals.  

:justsaying:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Not greg b said:

The catalyst had an un fair advantage with the new 600 and the competition couldn’t compete with it in the 900 class. They made them pull the 600 and put the 800 in it to run the 900 class. That slowed the sled down so much polaris stomped all over it  

If the event was lake racing and 8 out of 11 were Turbo 4 strokes and the top 3 were all 998's, it wouldn't surprise anyone nor would it be anything to gloat about.
There is no competition.
Now that Catalyst is out, there will be some competition next year with the 860 Turbo is complete.

But nothing really to take from this event, it doesn't really mean anything at all.
This year especially doesn't mean dick in terms of competition,  with some single machine,  cobbed Catalyst setup to compete.
You can throw that right out the window, once the playing field is even the event will actually matter.
Does anyone have a list of the entire field and how many sleds of each brand competed?
I'm guessing its 75% Polaris?

Those sleds are modded to the hills and not even close to being stock, once someone on a final production big bore Catalyst has the same power and tweaks to the chassis the competition does, it will be down to the rider. 

Edited by stinkipinki
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jdsky said:

"cloudiness sky's."  Maybe get checked for a concussion.  

Scratch that.  Just looked it up.  You need a brain in order to get a concussion.  

Coming from you, as expected. Over reacting to everything I type. Most would call you shallow. I call you spiled little girl.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Coming from you, as expected. Over reacting to everything I type. Most would call you shallow. I call you spiled little girl.

"spiled" sums it up about right.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Shut up stupid.

 

10 minutes ago, stinkipinki said:

If the event was lake racing and 8 out of 11 were Turbo 4 strokes and the top 3 were all 998's, it wouldn't surprise anyone nor would it be anything to gloat about.
There is no competition.
Now that Catalyst is out, there will be some competition next year with the 860 Turbo is complete.

But nothing really to take from this event, it doesn't really mean anything at all.
This year especially doesn't mean dick in terms of competition,  with some single machine,  cobbed Catalyst setup to compete.
You can throw that right out the window, once the playing field is even the event will actually matter.
Does anyone have a list of the entire field and how many sleds of each brand competed?
I'm guessing its 75% Polaris?

Those sleds are modded to the hills and not even close to being stock, once someone on a final production big bore Catalyst has the same power and tweaks to the chassis the competition does, it will be down to the rider. 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, HSR said:

Thread goes from the massive amounts of talent and sledding skills of Keith Curtis to 2 geriatrics discussing death defying  35 mph crashes.

Moral of the story :Speed limit for retards is 34 Mph.

And the "This race means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent - but WAIT!  IF this and IF that... just wait, it will be tremendous!

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mag6240 said:

And the "This race means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent - but WAIT!  IF this and IF that... just wait, it will be tremendous!

And for lake racing the "This race means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent - but WAIT!  IF this and IF that... just wait, it will be tremendous!

Lol almost sounds like a liberal. When the race is good for your brand, its a big deal, but when its not, its unheard of! Lol.
 

Edited by stinkipinki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mag6240 said:

And the "This race means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent - but WAIT!  IF this and IF that... just wait, it will be tremendous!

You know what ? If instead of a big fucking hill they had this race on a big fucking lake with corners and stuff and if they limited it to 600cc and if Herf was there on the new Catalyst it would be a totally different story :read:

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stinkipinki said:

And for lake racing the "This race means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent - but WAIT!  IF this and IF that... just wait, it will be tremendous!

Lol almost sounds like a liberal. When the race is good for your brand, its a big deal, but when its not, its unheard of! Lol.
 

Did I mention a brand??  I really don't give a shit what manufacturer won, the best RIDER won.  Wasn't that the thread title??

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mag6240 said:

And the "This race means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent - but WAIT!  IF this and IF that... just wait, it will be tremendous!

This quote could be used so many different ways in reference to the same manufacture :lol2:

And the "850 CC class means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent

And the "New chassis means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent

And the "Modern guage means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, HSR said:

if Herf was there on the new Catalyst it would be a totally different story :read:

Well, yea duh.
These Hillclimb teams put alot of work into these machines, they are completely configured to the beans and setup intently for this one specific event, with a proper factory big bore engine. If any of those teams do the same thing to a Mountain version of a finalized big bore Catalyst, it would come down to the rider, although the Catalyst would have the edge with the more balanced chassis.

Edit

And the "300+HP for 15,000 miles class means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent:lol:

Edited by stinkipinki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, stinkipinki said:

Well, yea duh.
These Hillclimb teams put alot of work into these machines, they are completely configured to the beans and setup intently for this one specific event, with a proper factory big bore engine. If any of those teams do the same thing to a Mountain version of a finalized big bore Catalyst, it would come down to the rider, although the Catalyst would have the edge with the more balanced chassis.

Edit

And the "300+HP for 15,000 miles class means nothing" because a specific manufacturer was almost non-existent:lol:

All Yamaha needs to do is come up with a good chassis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, stinkipinki said:

If the event was lake racing and 8 out of 11 were Turbo 4 strokes and the top 3 were all 998's, it wouldn't surprise anyone nor would it be anything to gloat about.
There is no competition.
Now that Catalyst is out, there will be some competition next year with the 860 Turbo is complete.

But nothing really to take from this event, it doesn't really mean anything at all.
This year especially doesn't mean dick in terms of competition,  with some single machine,  cobbed Catalyst setup to compete.
You can throw that right out the window, once the playing field is even the event will actually matter.
Does anyone have a list of the entire field and how many sleds of each brand competed?
I'm guessing its 75% Polaris?

Those sleds are modded to the hills and not even close to being stock, once someone on a final production big bore Catalyst has the same power and tweaks to the chassis the competition does, it will be down to the rider. 

And why exactly does Polaris and Doo dominate and get chosen by the riders?  Because the Cat isn't as good.   Just saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, stinkipinki said:

teams put alot of work into these machines, they are completely configured to the beans and setup intently for this one specific event,

So are you trying to tell me that at a snocross race they purposely set up sleds for snocross:dunno: You expect me to believe that at a XC race they set them up for XC:dunno:

I'm not sure I buy this line of BS. I always thought they pick up the sled from the dealer the morning of the race and just run it??? 

Are you pulling my leg here ??

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...