Jump to content

Twitter files


Pete

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pete said:

This is as good as watergate was.. interesting times ahead

So you think a private company suppressing information is on par with watergate? Political parties trying to cover up bad press while at the same time digging up dirt in the other is new?

Sorry to break it to you, but no one’s going to jail because a private company delete some posts off its platform.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, akvanden said:

So you think a private company suppressing information is on par with watergate? Political parties trying to cover up bad press while at the same time digging up dirt in the other is new?

Sorry to break it to you, but no one’s going to jail because a private company delete some posts off its platform.

The wh colluded aardvark… They are exposed and more is coming out. TFB if you don’t like it. 
Cover up and collusion to sway a election is what got the right in trouble in 1974.

This is no different 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Twitter granted requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign to remove content in 2020, report says

Dec 3, 2022, 10:16 PM
 
 
 
President Joe Biden; former President Donald Trump
President Joe Biden; former President Donald Trump  Manuel Balce Ceneta/Associated Press; Andrew Harnik/Associated Press
  • By 2020 it was "routine" for Twitter to grant content removal requests, journalist Matt Taibbi said.
  • Those requests came from both the White House and the Biden campaign during the election cycle.
  • Elon Musk, who hyped up Taibbi's reporting, has spoken out against the Biden team's actions.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pete said:

The wh colluded aardvark… They are exposed and more is coming out. TFB if you don’t like it. 
Cover up and collusion to sway a election is what got the right in trouble in 1974.

This is no different 

Watergate was breaking and entering. Asking a private media company to remove a post is not illegal. No different than asking a newspaper too not run a story, which isn’t illegal either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
3 minutes ago, akvanden said:

So you think a private company suppressing information is on par with watergate? Political parties trying to cover up bad press while at the same time digging up dirt in the other is new?

Sorry to break it to you, but no one’s going to jail because a private company delete some posts off its platform.

Remember when you said posts getting deleted and users getting shadow banned was a conspiracy theory? 

Glad you finally admit they do delete posts. :news:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, akvanden said:

Watergate was breaking and entering. Asking a private media company to remove a post is not illegal. No different than asking a newspaper too not run a story, which isn’t illegal either.

It certainly is when that order comes from the Dems during an election to game the system.

Fucking retard.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DeSantis is talking about starting his own media group that doesn’t have bias. He’s just tired of all the BS they make up about him on the libs media wing. He’s had to put up with a constant stream of lies and fake garbage since he became relevant in politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advertising Member

IMO what these clowns are slow to realize is in this new digital age everything is much more easily traceable.  Everything is forever....not so much in the old days when you picked up a landline phone, had a meeting, and greased some palms..... the game is the same but these dinosaurs have to figure out a way to not be as exposed as they are...... wait until the new class of politician gets in (ones that halfway understand tech).

Times are changing and again......D or R it doesn't matter.  They are all corrupt swill.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, akvanden said:

So you think a private company suppressing information is on par with watergate? Political parties trying to cover up bad press while at the same time digging up dirt in the other is new?

Sorry to break it to you, but no one’s going to jail because a private company delete some posts off its platform.

Because they did it at the behest of the government that could very well be unconstitutional and borderline treasonous 

but because you’re a fascist you actually like what they did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
48 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

It certainly is when that order comes from the Dems during an election to game the system.

Fucking retard.

Came from both sides.

But you will never acknowledge it.

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Came from both sides.

But you will never acknowledge it.

That's bullshit and you know it.

 

The Dems gave orders to not just Twitter, it now reaches Facebook, Apple and Google.  Google was just caught spinning elections away from the Repugs.

But you wouldn't know cause you keep getting your info from the fake news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

That's bullshit and you know it.

 

The Dems gave orders to not just Twitter, it now reaches Facebook, Apple and Google.  Google was just caught spinning elections away from the Repugs.

But you wouldn't know cause you keep getting your info from the fake news.

Also the FBI 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EvilBird said:

Remember when you said posts getting deleted and users getting shadow banned was a conspiracy theory? 

Glad you finally admit they do delete posts. :news:

No, but nice try.

47 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

It certainly is when that order comes from the Dems during an election to game the system.

Fucking retard.

That’s called coercion. Maybe that’s coming in future release?

13 minutes ago, ACE said:

Because they did it at the behest of the government that could very well be unconstitutional and borderline treasonous 

but because you’re a fascist you actually like what they did

Really. Who was in office during the last general election? Not the Biden administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, akvanden said:

No, but nice try.

That’s called coercion. Maybe that’s coming in future release?

Really. Who was in office during the last general election? Not the Biden administration.

I believe there’s even lawsuits been filed by more than one AG. I assume you’re against that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...