Jump to content

Pandemic Of The Vax


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Roosting said:

Well your claim of X per 100K vax vs un vax is useless until you can prove how effective said concoction is. Once you have done that then you can use the x per 100K to further interpolate the data to overall efficacy is infact what was claimed and can be utilized going forward with new boosters.

You relied on a retard talking point and repeated it as some sort of fact when it is not

You're not helping your side of the argument. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
40 minutes ago, Snake said:

"...if you want to be taken seriously around here."

 

 

SIR!...i will have you know i will not tolerate the besmirching of my good name on the snowmobile current events forum.I will simply not stand for it.

 

:lol:

 

is someone on there period or what ? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

How are you factoring vax injuries when they outnumber covid deaths.

Get a spreadsheet going.

Your vax injuries are pure speculation though.

ie: they're dropping like flies from myocarditis. 

But they aren't, so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

Your vax injuries are pure speculation though.

ie: they're dropping like flies from myocarditis. 

But they aren't, so there's that.

No people are actually dying.  From what all of a sudden?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

No people are actually dying.  From what all of a sudden?

 

Well hopefully the bodies don't start piling up and blocking the highways. I gotta flight to catch Monday!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, Snake said:

So much man love flowing around the vaxxers today... must have had a good dinner last night...

Has DriftBusta been neglecting you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

Well hopefully the bodies don't start piling up and blocking the highways. I gotta flight to catch Monday!!!

Are the insurance companies reporting increase in deaths lying or is it cnn?

I know who is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Roosting said:

Well your claim of X per 100K vax vs un vax is useless until you can prove how effective said concoction is. Once you have done that then you can use the x per 100K to further interpolate the data to overall efficacy is infact what was claimed and can be utilized going forward with new boosters.

Wow. :lol:

 

No, to compare two rates you just need to know the group size and deaths per group, that’s it. Pretty simple.

 

 

26 minutes ago, Roosting said:

 

Edited by akvanden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

How are you factoring vax injuries when they outnumber covid deaths.

Get a spreadsheet going.

I’m not, because that wasn’t the question you asked that you’re now trying to change it to. 9_9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
34 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Are the insurance companies reporting increase in deaths lying or is it cnn?

I know who is correct.

Well you always seem to know what's on CNN. So I'd say it's CNN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Snake said:

Just a note:

Fighting tooth and nail for the vax has zero effect on whether you die or not... :lol:

Just a note:

Fighting tooth and nail against the vax will have zero effect on whether you die or not...:lol:

What a stupid point , again

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, akvanden said:

Wow. :lol:

 

No, to compare two rates you just need to know the group size and deaths per group, that’s it. Pretty simple.

 

 

nice side step. I knew this was too complicated for you to comprehend

anyway.................. now define the groups

I just gave you some criteria . see if can put it to good use

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Roosting said:

nice side step. I knew this was too complicated for you to comprehend

anyway.................. now define the groups

I just gave you some criteria . see if can put it to good use

:lol:

 

show me how efficacy changes the rate. Use a simple example: 100 people die that are vaccinated out 1,000 people, show me how an efficacy rate of 50% or 75% will change the rate of the people who have already died.

 

:pc:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Tell us how well the vax is working when 58% of those dying are vaxxed.  Please use all the data available to prove your point.

Are those vaxxed,

High risk?

Older?

Half dead already?

I don't know one person over 65 that didn't get the vax.

Are the unvaccinated,

Low risk?

Younger?

Healthy?

You see where I'm going? No? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...