XCR1250 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 NTSB wants all new vehicles to check drivers for alcohol use TOM KRISHER September 20, 2022, 6:29 PM Automobile Breathalyzers FILE - A row of crosses form a memorial along Highway 33 as police officers survey the scene a day after a crash killed nine people south of Coalinga, Calif., Saturday, Jan. 2, 2021. Investigators said the driver of an SUV involved in the crash was drunk and didn't have a license. The National Transportation Safety Board will use a final report on the crash to launch an effort to lobby for regulations requiring alcohol breath testing devices on all new vehicles. (Eric Paul Zamora/The Fresno Bee via AP) ASSOCIATED PRESS DETROIT (AP) — The National Transportation Safety Board is recommending that all new vehicles in the U.S. be equipped with blood alcohol monitoring systems that can stop an intoxicated person from driving. The recommendation, if enacted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, could reduce the number of alcohol-related crashes, one of the biggest causes of highway deaths in the U.S. The new push to make roads safer was included in a report released Tuesday about a horrific crash last year in which a drunk driver collided head-on with another vehicle near Fresno, California, killing both adult drivers and seven children. NHTSA said this week that roadway deaths in the U.S. are at crisis levels. Nearly 43,000 people were killed last year, the greatest number in 16 years, as Americans returned to roads after pandemic stay-at-home orders. Early estimates show fatalities rising again through the first half of this year, but they declined from April through June, which authorities are hoping is a trend. The NTSB, which has no regulatory authority and can only ask other agencies to act, said the recommendation is designed to put pressure on NHTSA to move. It could be effective as early as three years from now. “We need NHTSA to act. We see the numbers,” NTSB Chairman Jennifer Homendy said. “We need to make sure that we’re doing all we can to save lives.” The NTSB, she said, has been pushing NHTSA to explore alcohol monitoring technology since 2012. “The faster the technology is implemented the more lives that will be saved,” she said. The recommendation also calls for systems to monitor a driver’s behavior, making sure they’re alert. She said many cars now have cameras pointed at the driver, which have the potential to limit impaired driving. But Homendy says she also understands that perfecting the alcohol tests will take time. “We also know that it’s going to take time for NHTSA to evaluate what technologies are available and how to develop a standard.” A message was left Tuesday seeking comment from NHTSA. The agency and a group of 16 automakers have been jointly funding research on alcohol monitoring since 2008, forming a group called Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety. The group has hired a Swedish company to research technology that would automatically test a driver’s breath for alcohol and stop a vehicle from moving if the driver is impaired, said Jake McCook, spokesman for the group. The driver wouldn’t have to blow into a tube, and a sensor would check the driver’s breath, McCook said. Another company is working on light technology that could test for blood alcohol in a person’s finger, he said. Breath technology could be ready by the end of 2024, while the touch technology would come about a year later. It could take one or two more model years after automakers get the technology for it to be in new vehicles, McCook said. Once the technology is ready, it will take years for it to be in most of the roughly 280 million vehicles on U.S. roads. Under last year’s bipartisan infrastructure law, Congress required NHTSA to make automakers install alcohol monitoring systems within three years. The agency can seek an extension. In the past it has been slow to enact such requirements. The legislation doesn’t specify the technology, only that it must “passively monitor” a driver to determine if they are impaired. In 2020, the most recent figures available, 11,654 people died in alcohol-related crashes, according to NHTSA data. That’s about 30% of all U.S. traffic deaths, and a 14% increase over 2019 figures, the last full year before the coronavirus pandemic, the NTSB said. In the fatal crash included in the report, a 28-year-old driver of an SUV was headed home from a 2021 New Year’s Day party where he had been drinking. The SUV went off the right side of State Route 33, crossed the center line and hit a Ford F-150 pickup truck head-on near Avenal, California. The pickup was carrying 34-year-old Gabriela Pulido and seven children ages 6 to 15 home after a trip to Pismo Beach. The truck quickly caught fire and bystanders couldn’t save the passengers, the NTSB said. The SUV driver’s blood alcohol level was 0.21%, nearly three times California’s legal limit. He also had marijuana in his system, but the agency said the alcohol was more than enough to severely impair his driving. The SUV was traveling 88-to-98 miles per hour (142 to 158 kilometers per hour), the report said. The crash happened less than a second from when the Journey re-entered the road, giving Pulido no time to avoid the collision, the NTSB said. Juan Pulido, 37, whose wife and four children were killed in the crash, said he’s happy the NTSB is pushing for alcohol monitoring because it could stop another person from losing loved ones. “It’s something that their families have to live with,” he said. “It doesn’t go away tomorrow.” Pulido’s lawyer, Paul Kiesel, says driver monitoring systems also could stop crashes caused by medical problems or drowsiness, saving anguish and billions in hospital treatment costs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 That’s never going to happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vtblizzard800 Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 8 people in a f150. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 Yeah eff that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 Some people will starve because they won’t be able to leave home. Ever. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHADOSPRIT Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 7 hours ago, Vtblizzard800 said: 8 people in a f150. Doesn't that happen every morning in front of Home Depot!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry 976 Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 9 hours ago, SHADOSPRIT said: Doesn't that happen every morning in front of Home Depot!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 What will poor Paul Pelosi do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleepybrew Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 kind of like cars getting towed in and finding out the used car dealer put a device in that they can turn the car off if they don't pay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.