Jump to content

Roe vs wade set to be over turned!


Recommended Posts

I can't believe that this should even be an issue in our lives.  

Unreal. America truly sucks.

Considering all that goes on in this country, and has gone on, and will go on, this country sucks big time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is all orchestrated by the establishment dems to unite folks against repubs in the fall. It's their nuclear option. They love nothing more than killing babies. 

Roe v Wade has always been a terrible piece of jurisprudence though in the vagaries of the arguments and opinions. We can do better. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt said:

This is all orchestrated by the establishment dems to unite folks against repubs in the fall. It's their nuclear option. They love nothing more than killing babies. 

Roe v Wade has always been a terrible piece of jurisprudence though in the vagaries of the arguments and opinions. We can do better. 

Oh yeah. It was leaked. Not suspect at all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is the ruling will toss abortion legislation back to the states where it belongs. The people of say Kansas have different values than Kalifornia...if Kali wants to harm its citizens, have at it. 

The only thing you have to do to change someone's opinion of abortion is read aloud the dilation and extraction step by step medical procedure. How they use forceps to rip off the arms and legs. Then when you get to the part of sucking it the brains so you can crush the skull they usually have enough.  

Edited by SkisNH
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Matt said:

This was exactly the thing the dems needed to salvage any chance in the midterms. This ugly year just got worse. 

The propaganda machine is aleady in high gear.  I don’t see The Democrats winning this one. on the other hand, I was bored last night with nothing on television, so I tuned into Laura Ingram.  I rarely watch her show, she’s a little too shrill for me. And I didn’t even know about this news release yet, but she was apoplectic about it. I know she’s well known pro life, but she was also a supreme court clerk, and knows the rules about confidentialities in the courts business. She claims whoever leaked this is screwed big time. We will see how it plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Badger** said:

 

The rights will be turned over to the states for them to make their own laws. Now the leaker is the issue and someone crossed the line and will be disbarred.

Looking like Sotomayor's clerk.  We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 hours ago, Matt said:

This is all orchestrated by the establishment dems to unite folks against repubs in the fall. It's their nuclear option. They love nothing more than killing babies. 

Roe v Wade has always been a terrible piece of jurisprudence though in the vagaries of the arguments and opinions. We can do better. 

100%.   Specifically leaked to rile up the base because they are losing on basically EVERY issue.   

These opinions change as they are passed from Justice to Justice.   Leaking it is an attempt to put fear in a judge or two and potentially change the outcome.   The leaker must be investigated and charged.  Pretty clear this came out of one of two Justices offices.  Whomever it was better hope it wasn't approved by a Justice themselves.  

Edited by Highmark
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Matt said:

This is all orchestrated by the establishment dems to unite folks against repubs in the fall. It's their nuclear option. They love nothing more than killing babies. 

Roe v Wade has always been a terrible piece of jurisprudence though in the vagaries of the arguments and opinions. We can do better. 

The thing is the election in the fall will have no barring on the supreme Court deliberation at this point. The election to effect the supreme Court deliberation on abortions happened back in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said:

The thing is the election in the fall will have no barring on the supreme Court deliberation at this point. The election to effect the supreme Court deliberation on abortions happened back in 2016.

Its about firing up the base because they are losing on basically every single other issue important to the American people.   It was intentionally leaked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said:

The thing is the election in the fall will have no barring on the supreme Court deliberation at this point. The election to effect the supreme Court deliberation on abortions happened back in 2016.

This opinion was written in Feb.  There is another reason it came out now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

This opinion was written in Feb.  There is another reason it came out now.

Intimidation and distraction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Its about firing up the base because they are losing on basically every single other issue important to the American people.   It was intentionally leaked. 

Yeah. Think they’re hoping it makes people hold their nose and pull the blue lever 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, ACE said:

From what I understand it was always a contentious ruling that they figured wouldn’t hold up to scrutiny in the first place 

Even Ginsburg said it was decided incorrectly.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Well considering there is no clear definition of a woman anymore why should "a woman's right to abortion" be a valid argument?  :lol: 

Edited by Highmark
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 hours ago, SkisNH said:

My guess is the ruling will toss abortion legislation back to the states where it belongs. The people of say Kansas have different values than Kalifornia...if Kali wants to harm its citizens, have at it. 

The only thing you have to do to change someone's opinion of abortion is read aloud the dilation and extraction step by step medical procedure. How they use forceps to rip off the arms and legs. Then when you get to the part of sucking it the brains so you can crush the skull they usually have enough.  

Sounds peaceful and painless....especially for a 9 month old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...