ArcticCrusher Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 11 minutes ago, Deephaven said: You changed your tune shortly thereafter. That was the first post you made that I could no longer stand by and watch your idiocy without saying something. As for the variants. This is also some non-logical BS you are being told on Twitter. Any virologist will tell you that the main cause of variants are people getting the disease. We also refuted all this as your whole basis were the variants that occurred before the vaccine. Per population that isn't true. Just look at everything you've ever posted. Can't believe you still believe this shit. So fucking dumb. You also stated the weak should and do get the vax so based on your other comments it would even be expected if per capita it were higher...but it isn't. This would also show a negative efficacy which you keep claiming but then show information that states the opposite. You should stop repeating what your moronic twitter friends tell you and instead think for yourself for once. Let's stay on topic which is negative efficacy. Unless you are just avoiding it because you agree that this is not the case with the shot. The variants are driven by a leaky vaccine, ie what we have as opposed to a sterilizing one like polio was. This is common knowledge, sorry if you don't understand. As for negative efficiency, look at the young almost zero deaths during the first and supposed deadliest wave but now more have shifted to them, this is not normal. It's the vax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 15 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: The variants are driven by a leaky vaccine, ie what we have as opposed to a sterilizing one like polio was. Lol, then explain the multiple variants that were out before the shot was...and then apply that to the ones after. I suppose you want to blame the flu variants that have been happening for over a 100 years on leaky vaccines as well. 15 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: This is common knowledge, sorry if you don't understand. Interesting segue... 15 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: As for negative efficiency, look at the young almost zero deaths during the first and supposed deadliest wave but now more have shifted to them, this is not normal. It's the vax. So the new variants have a different effect than the old ones? Imagine that. Easily understood by everyone else, but that alludes you obviously. We see your pathetically simple line of thinking. This is not normal therefore it is the vax. ROFL. Even funnier that you type negative efficacy is related to the above. The role of a vax is to keep people from being sick therefore having negative efficacy (not efficiency-moron) would mean that more people per population get sick after the shot than ones without. This is not happening. Everything you think you've read on your propaganda sites are leaving out information and drawing the wrong conclusion. ALL of the data you've shared with us so far show the opposite...yet you conclude differently. Sorry if you don't understand, 3rd grade math is common knowledge. Perhaps someday you'll get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 7 minutes ago, Deephaven said: Lol, then explain the multiple variants that were out before the shot was...and then apply that to the ones after. I suppose you want to blame the flu variants that have been happening for over a 100 years on leaky vaccines as well. Interesting segue... So the new variants have a different effect than the old ones? Imagine that. Easily understood by everyone else, but that alludes you obviously. We see your pathetically simple line of thinking. This is not normal therefore it is the vax. ROFL. Even funnier that you type negative efficacy is related to the above. The role of a vax is to keep people from being sick therefore having negative efficacy (not efficiency-moron) would mean that more people per population get sick after the shot than ones without. This is not happening. Everything you think you've read on your propaganda sites are leaving out information and drawing the wrong conclusion. ALL of the data you've shared with us so far show the opposite...yet you conclude differently. Sorry if you don't understand, 3rd grade math is common knowledge. Perhaps someday you'll get it. The vax is supposed to keep people from getting the virus, it doesn't. It's that's simple. This vax does not do that, it's that simple. This vax is useless and only creates more variants, it's that simple. Changing the definition of a vaccine doesn't fool anyone except sheep. It's that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 None of that means it has a negative efficacy. Completely off topic. You were trying for once to explain something yourself but forgot the point obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 2, 2022 Share Posted May 2, 2022 28 minutes ago, Deephaven said: None of that means it has a negative efficacy. Completely off topic. You were trying for once to explain something yourself but forgot the point obviously. If there's a 40% increase in excess mortality as verified by the insurance underwriters, does that count as a positive for you? Regardless of vax status. Do you need that to be peer reviewed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 12 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: If there's a 40% increase in excess mortality as verified by the insurance underwriters, does that count as a positive for you? Regardless of vax status. Do you need that to be peer reviewed? Regardless of vax, so unrelated. Way to confirm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 21 minutes ago, Deephaven said: Regardless of vax, so unrelated. Way to confirm. Unrelated? You're a special kind of stupid, what event changed, this is being seen worldwide. Get a fucking clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: Unrelated? You're a special kind of stupid, what event changed, this is being seen worldwide. Get a fucking clue. Oh so you can separate Covid vs Shot as the influence? If not, it is indeed unrelated. You can't be that dumb, can you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 When are you going to show us this negative efficacy you keep promising? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 16 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: If there's a 40% increase in excess mortality as verified by the insurance underwriters, does that count as a positive for you? Regardless of vax status. Do you need that to be peer reviewed? Regardless of vax status. Exactly. Where are all these additional medical claims coming from in the healthcare industry? They seem to be doing well with no forward-looking mention of increasing medical costs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted May 3, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 3, 2022 I will continue to listen to the experts and voice of reason. How are ya spin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 6 hours ago, Deephaven said: Oh so you can separate Covid vs Shot as the influence? If not, it is indeed unrelated. You can't be that dumb, can you? Are you really this fucking stupid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 Are you refuting what I posted without reason or logic? Trying to impress your flock by taking a stand even though you don't know what to say? You are pathetic. The amount of time you waste watching stupid propaganda is absurd and has melted what little brain you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: Are you really this fucking stupid? 1 hour ago, Deephaven said: Are you refuting what I posted without reason or logic? Trying to impress your flock by taking a stand even though you don't know what to say? You are pathetic. The amount of time you waste watching stupid propaganda is absurd and has melted what little brain you have. I'll take that as a yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 50 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: I'll take that as a yes. Then you are dumber than we all thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 2 minutes ago, Deephaven said: Then you are dumber than we all thought. Stay strong moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted May 3, 2022 Share Posted May 3, 2022 Thanks for proving my point that you don't have the intelligence to defend your position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.