Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 47 minutes ago, Highmark said: Vince is kind of like King of the Nerds. BINGO! Well, the roles tend to rotate from time to time I think.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 That's awesome! Everything from the Irony part to revkev being the black gay nerd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 31, 2017 Author Share Posted January 31, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: You got lucky with Booger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Well done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 6 hours ago, 02sled said: I refuse to follow directions from my boss I get fired. Pretty straight forward. 5 hours ago, Cold War said: Yeah, if we have a disagreement on how it should it be done. ....Your concerns noted, now do your job or hit the door. I don't know anyone who gets to pick and choose what directions they listen to by their boss. Really? You two idiots can't think of an example? Trucking firm owner vs mechanic: Mechanic: The brakes are shot on that truck, they need to be replaced. Owner: Sign it off that they were inspected and are ok. Basically any where that an employee would have to sign off on something that would be illegal or unsafe. CEO to accountant whatever. Would you as a supervisor order your employees to do something dangerous just because the boss ordered you to? She wasn't convinced that the order was legal, enforceable or constitutional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 Lamar is getting angry 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Lamar is getting angry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Really? You two idiots can't think of an example? Trucking firm owner vs mechanic: Mechanic: The brakes are shot on that truck, they need to be replaced. Owner: Sign it off that they were inspected and are ok. Basically any where that an employee would have to sign off on something that would be illegal or unsafe. CEO to accountant whatever. Would you as a supervisor order your employees to do something dangerous just because the boss ordered you to? She wasn't convinced that the order was legal, enforceable or constitutional. The mechanic has a choice do as the boss tells him, quit, or ignore the boss and get replaced. What other choice do you think they have. The boss has the choice to terminate anyone at anytime for any reason. in her case the legality was just her opinion and she chose to stand that moral high ground knowing the consequences Edited January 31, 2017 by 02sled Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: Holy fuck I just busted out laughing in this quite office Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, Skidooski said: Holy fuck I just busted out laughing in this quite office Calm down...it's not worth losing your job about. But I fucking LOL'ed too! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 2 minutes ago, 02sled said: The mechanic has a choice do as the boss tells him, quit, or ignore the boss and get replaced. What other choice do you think they have. The boss has the choice to terminate anyone at anytime for any reason. So you would put your signature on a document stating something was safe when it wasn't just because the boss told you to? ahem. Home of the Brave cough cough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 8 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Really? You two idiots can't think of an example? Trucking firm owner vs mechanic: Mechanic: The brakes are shot on that truck, they need to be replaced. Owner: Sign it off that they were inspected and are ok. Basically any where that an employee would have to sign off on something that would be illegal or unsafe. CEO to accountant whatever. Would you as a supervisor order your employees to do something dangerous just because the boss ordered you to? She wasn't convinced that the order was legal, enforceable or constitutional. STFU No one is telling anyone to break the law or do something dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, revkevsdi said: So you would put your signature on a document stating something was safe when it wasn't just because the boss told you to? ahem. Home of the Brave cough cough. I would probably get fired since I could probably be held liable if someone was driving and got killed or hurt. That's my choice. If I'm fired I typically get severance if I quit I definitely don't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, Cold War said: STFU No one is telling anyone to break the law or do something dangerous. They cannot and refuse to distinguish between the two. It's the next step above "hate for those who feel different", it's transpose laws and rights into "dangerous and unconstitutional". See, in their minds, the Constitution is still up for interpretation at their whimsy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: They cannot and refuse to distinguish between the two. It's the next step above "hate for those who feel different", it's transpose laws and rights into "dangerous and unconstitutional". See, in their minds, the Constitution is still up for interpretation at their whimsy. Can't make a post without assigning a false or fabricated narrative to someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 11 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Calm down...it's not worth losing your job about. But I fucking LOL'ed too! At lunch, small office only 2 people here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 2 hours ago, Skidooski said: Lamar is getting angry 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 31, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 4 hours ago, Zambroski said: BINGO! Well, the roles tend to rotate from time to time I think.... Ok now that's god damn funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 All the fucking illegal shit that has happened in washington the last number of years and this stupid cunt draws her moral line here? Fuck her , pack your shit you stupid partisan cunt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 4 hours ago, 02sled said: I would probably get fired since I could probably be held liable if someone was driving and got killed or hurt. That's my choice. If I'm fired I typically get severance if I quit I definitely don't By your logic, you should just do what your boss says. 4 hours ago, Zambroski said: They cannot and refuse to distinguish between the two. It's the next step above "hate for those who feel different", it's transpose laws and rights into "dangerous and unconstitutional". See, in their minds, the Constitution is still up for interpretation at their whimsy. Not at our whimsy, at the whimsy of someone who said she would uphold the constitution rather than obey the President. It was the answer the right wing wanted when she was hired. 4 hours ago, Cold War said: STFU No one is telling anyone to break the law or do something dangerous. It's dangerous for the people who get returned to the middle east. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted January 31, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted January 31, 2017 The following is from Cornell Law Library. It would seem she owed her highest allegiance to the Constitution, not the President. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office Quote An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law. (Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 424.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 7 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: . Not at our whimsy, at the whimsy of someone who said she would uphold the constitution rather than obey the President. It was the answer the right wing wanted when she was hired. You are poorly informed and educated about these matters. And your vigilant "Fake news" watching is contributing. Do we need to do an intervention for you, Lamar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 31, 2017 Share Posted January 31, 2017 4 minutes ago, Kivalo said: The following is from Cornell Law Library. It would seem she owed her highest allegiance to the Constitution, not the President. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office It's all there between the constitution and her "other oaths by law". It was her political grandstanding that got her canned. She could have taken and advisory role to try and express her PERSONAL VIEWS but, instead, she tried to torpedo the administration. She was waiting for this moment to be a liberal "champion". ADIOS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.