Was the 2020 election stolen?

[Catalina]

I have to think that if Trump had been reelected, he would have ended it, everyone would have come home. 

 

Difference is, I think he would have cleared out the civilians first, them the military, instead of the other way around.  Probably would have worked better...

[Skidooski]

Ooops   

[EvilBird]

4 minutes ago, Catalina said:

I have to think that if Trump had been reelected, he would have ended it, everyone would have come home. 

 

Difference is, I think he would have cleared out the civilians first, them the military, instead of the other way around.  Probably would have worked better...

Agree . We were already set to leave , how do you think Biden was able to stream line it so fast? 

That shit doesnt happen overnight . The Sheep just believe that it did. 

[XCR1250]

  

  FEDERAL AGENCIES 

  The top U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies have concluded that there was no widespread voter fraud in the Nov. 3, 2020, presidential election. 

  Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr, the nation's top law enforcement official under Trump, said on Dec. 1, 2020, that he had not seen any evidence of fraud that would have changed the election results. 

  Barr was more pointed in a later interview with journalist Jonathan Karl for Karl's book "Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show." 

  "If there was evidence of fraud, I had no motive to suppress it," Barr told Karl. "But my suspicion all the way along was that there was nothing there. It was all bullshit." 

  The 2020 presidential election was the most secure in American history, according to a statement issued by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, on Nov. 12, 2020. 

  "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised," the statement read. 

  COURT CASES 

  State and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits brought by Trump and his allies challenging the election. 

  Several judges, including Trump appointees, noted a lack of evidence of fraudulently cast votes. 

  U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann, a conservative jurist in Pennsylvania, issued a decision on Nov. 21, 2020, that dismissed the Trump campaign's effort to block the certification of Biden's victory in the key election battleground state. 

  "One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption," Brann wrote. "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations." 

  Of one of the assertions made by Trump campaign, Brann wrote: "This claim, like Frankenstein's Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together." 

  A Trump appointee in Milwaukee, U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig, similarly rebuked a Trump campaign lawsuit contesting the election results in that state. 

  Unlike other judges who dismissed cases on procedural grounds, Ludwig provided the Trump campaign with a day-long hearing to consider evidence that Wisconsin's election rules were violated. Ludwig found that evidence woefully lacking. 

  "This court has allowed the plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits," Ludwig wrote. 

  STATE AUDITS 

  In Georgia, an election battleground state won narrowly by Biden, a post-election audit was conducted by Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who was the state's top election official. 

  "The audit confirmed that the original machine count accurately portrayed the winner of the election," Raffensperger's office said on Nov. 19, 2020. 

  In Arizona, a review of results by Trump allies in its most populous county reaffirmed Biden's victory in the crucial state. 

  Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican who paved the way for the "full forensic audit" of 2.1 million ballots in Maricopa County, said in September that the review's overall vote tally matched the initial results in November.