jtssrx Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 He should have never even been charged 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 Well duh. Obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 The verdict will be interesting. Any charge where he is “guilty” is a farce. Poor judgement is not illegal…..and really, the argument is, was it really that poor of judgement? Maybe we should all follow this kid a little……in force. It’s clear the left have labeled rioting hoodlums “heroes” maybe it’s time for Americans to step up with some heroes themselves. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 He’s a murderer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3600 Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 Fortunately or unfortunately these types of events occasionally need to go to the judiciary to reaffirm or set new precedence on how far our rights extend. We have watched as protesters have pushed further and further with free speech, destruction, and violence. Now it appears the pendulum pushes back the other way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 16 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer. The people he killed were attempting murder. Can't say they were peacefully going after the guy with the AR. No way in hell that flies. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted November 16, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2021 21 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer. Alec Baldwin?? 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdsky Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 43 minutes ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer of business burning insurrectionists with extensive criminal histories that were attacking him. MC always needs help completing a coherent sentence. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer. SMH 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 3 hours ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer. No that's you every time you grab your dick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 He wasn’t even a legal gun owner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer. Who would you rather have as your neighbor, the kid or the pieces of shit he killed? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacapster Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 What's taking so long? Should be a no brainer... He was being chased & violently attacked by an angry mob that was out for blood and would've done great bodily harm or worse. The first guy he shot had him cornered and was coming at him with a chain he had stole off a trailer. Dude was in his 30s and muscular going after a 17 year old kid. He was also off his meds and oh yeah had a history of 11 counts of child molestation. The next guy was beating him over the head with a skate board and tried to get his gun and the final guy pointed a loaded Glock at him before he pulled the trigger. They make the argument he shouldn't have been there trying to provide security - well the arsonists shouldn't have been there either. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted November 16, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2021 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: AK Mag in an AR that's how dumb that meme and it's creator are 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 4 hours ago, Mainecat said: He wasn’t even a legal gun owner. He wasn't breaking the law by carrying a long rifle. Law only applies to short barreled firearms in WI law. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted November 16, 2021 Author Share Posted November 16, 2021 7 hours ago, Mainecat said: He’s a murderer. Nothing you say on the subject is relevant. I hope you encounter someone who wants to kill you and then by your rule you can't defend yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted November 16, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2021 5 hours ago, Mainecat said: He wasn’t even a legal gun owner. Did he own a gun? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 The Gun charge was thrown out in court yesterday because the gun Rittenhouse had was more than long enough to be legal. I suppose if you only watch CNN or MSNBC they would have edited that part of the trial as it made the prosecution look foolish. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted November 16, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Matt said: He wasn't breaking the law by carrying a long rifle. Law only applies to short barreled firearms in WI law. Yep, it wasn't an SBR so charges were dropped Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 The real question is why was the gun charge put on Rittenhouse in the first place. Does the prosecution not know how to read a tape measure or WI gun laws? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayward Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 5 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Who would you rather have as your neighbor, the kid or the pieces of shit he killed? for MC, it all depends on how they vote Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: The real question is why was the gun charge put on Rittenhouse in the first place. Does the prosecution not know how to read a tape measure or WI gun laws? Laws and knowledge don’t matter for them on this….or much else anymore. “Feelings” are what matter. 3 minutes ago, hayward said: for MC, it all depends on how they vote He needs his head crushed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 8 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: The real question is why was the gun charge put on Rittenhouse in the first place. Does the prosecution not know how to read a tape measure or WI gun laws? This is the ultimate "throw shit at the wall" trial. Open and shut case that had no business ever being opened. The only thing this kid is guilty of is having questionable intelligence, but I remember how I was as a 17 year old and could see myself thinking it was a good idea to do what he did... 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.