ActionfigureJoe Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 8, 2021 Author Share Posted January 8, 2021 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted January 8, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2021 4 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Seems like a good guy, I got no issue with what he said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 I like Dan. He's reasonable. Would love to see he and Gabbard run together. Where he gets it wrong though is that this can be fixed at the state-by-state level. While he's right that by law, it needs to be fixed at a state-by-state level, I don't see it happening. When even Republican-led states like Georgia are willing to kowtow to the likes of Stacey Abrams and remove validity checks, how can you expect this to be fixed on a large scale? I still think both parties need to fund a not-for-profit organization that takes top tech minds from both the right and left and lets them build a foolproof, identity-based election system that produces a completely auditable result with both digital and physical copies. This system should then be audited before and after every election by representatives from both parties. It would be so easy to develop a system at the federal level that could feed down to the states and have everyone feel confident/comfortable with the outcomes. Right now, you have Dems whining that Repubs are trying to suppress votes and Repubs feeling like the whole damn electorate is disenfranchised because one side doesn't want there to be any rules. That shouldn't happen, and it's one of the biggest reasons we're an international laughing stock. People in other countries can't believe we don't need to show ID to vote and how backwards our systems are... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 8, 2021 Author Share Posted January 8, 2021 14 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Seems like a good guy, I got no issue with what he said He’s right on. My only issue that he didn’t call out those in his party that lied and convinced people of something that would never happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted January 8, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2021 21 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: He’s right on. My only issue that he didn’t call out those in his party that lied and convinced people of something that would never happen. I thought he did,. Where he repeatedly said, "they lied to you" "nothing was ever going to change and they knew that".. IMO that's calling them out.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 9, 2021 Author Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Rigid1 said: I thought he did,. Where he repeatedly said, "they lied to you" "nothing was ever going to change and they knew that".. IMO that's calling them out.. That’s correct. But he didn’t name names. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayatodaU.P.eh? Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: That’s correct. But he didn’t name names. You LITERALLY assuming anything that fits your personal narrative. I’m fairly certain you can put 2 and 2 together. Or not. Doesn’t fucking matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 9, 2021 Author Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 minute ago, SayatodaU.P.eh? said: You LITERALLY assuming anything that fits your personal narrative. I’m fairly certain you can put 2 and 2 together. Or not. Doesn’t fucking matter. Have you ever thought about anger management? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayatodaU.P.eh? Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Just now, ActionfigureJoe said: Have you ever thought about anger management? Oh that’s right, you’re a shrink. You can tell I’m pissed off from there. Right. Was kind of weirding me out there for a minute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 9, 2021 Author Share Posted January 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, SayatodaU.P.eh? said: Oh that’s right, you’re a shrink. You can tell I’m pissed off from there. Right. Was kind of weirding me out there for a minute. You didn’t get one thing right in that post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 One good thing about this fiasco is these mother fuckers know that what they say has consequences. Lots of pants shitting during that invasion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted January 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 9, 2021 31 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: That’s correct. But he didn’t name names. Well IMO he showed some class, didn't go off the rails in some crazy rant,..I think we all knew who "they lied to you" were??..or did that throw you for a loop?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayatodaU.P.eh? Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 27 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Well IMO he showed some class, didn't go off the rails in some crazy rant,..I think we all knew who "they lied to you" were??..or did that throw you for a loop?? He has to have it spelled out to him. He wants, no HAS, to read the specific names. Because liberal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Anler said: One good thing about this fiasco is these mother fuckers know that what they say has consequences. Lots of pants shitting during that invasion. That shit was all scripted like WEE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 9, 2021 Author Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Rigid1 said: Well IMO he showed some class, didn't go off the rails in some crazy rant,..I think we all knew who "they lied to you" were??..or did that throw you for a loop?? I was disappointed in Dan. He usually doesn’t take the cheap seat and not go all the way. Not only did he fail to name names of the congressional culprits, he also failed to call out the talking heads in the media that supported these lies. Good start on Dan’s part, but very weak finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 9, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, SayatodaU.P.eh? said: He has to have it spelled out to him. He wants, no HAS, to read the specific names. Because liberal. You talk like you’re still in the HCS echo chamber. Edited January 9, 2021 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted January 9, 2021 Author Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Anler said: One good thing about this fiasco is these mother fuckers know that what they say has consequences. Lots of pants shitting during that invasion. I don’t think there’s any pant shitting. The right wing media that lied to its viewers about the possibility of the election being overturned, when there was zero possibility, made lots of money and enhanced viewership. The congressmen that lied will ride the high tide for awhile with the lower intellect trumpers. So it’s really a win win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.