Seatofmypants

Think what you will.

and one that isn't 82 fucking years old.

The sooner dems realize that most republicans want trump to go away the better off they will be. That being said, who wants liz cheney or romney? We need a middle of the road dem or repub to pull us out of this cycle....really hope it happens in 2024.

My man.

I will say as feeders they are started on grass and moved into the lot when they are like 7-800 lbs. Then they don't see any grass the rest of their days.

Are you high? Grain and hay only for my beef.

Dad is retired....so that is what he likes to fuck with. That being said, he needs to chill out, he's getting old and I'd hate to see him get hurt around the farm.

Start a bbq and spice company.

True story....my pops is finishing out 2 wagyu calves for us (one steer and 1 heifer) I CANNOT WAIT. That being said he finishes out 20 head of angus steers a year so I already eat really good beef as it is...but I'm hoping for next level shit here. Finished in 18 months....he grinds his own feed, bales his own hay, so he controls the whole process. Butcher ages them for right at 30 days before cutting. Devil is in the details.

That isn't medium rare..... pull at 105 or 110 din rest for 10 minutes. Will change your life.

I guess Canada guns hold only 4 rounds.

He shot 19 times? Missed that.

An accomplice with a young kid in the car. Fuck her to.

hahahahahahahahaha fuck that other side.

@Mainecat tell the class how gun safety would have saved this poor guy.

Would better background checks have helped Hunter check the right box (yes or No) on his 4473?

Sooooooooo what you are saying is breaking gun laws is acceptable?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA. Some of you guys need to go outside, cook some bbq, stop being such partisan shills. Rates, supply and demand, consumer spending have nothing to do with dropping inflation.......its the "inflation reduction act" thanks president Biden.

You realize that isn't how it works right? The government would have been paying banks to borrow money from them, not the other way around.....as it typical.

China has a population problem. They aren't gonna own the US. US taxpayers have a better chance owning the US then China every will.

You mis-spelled "CDC"

If I were you, or the democratic party I wouldn't be cheering this. If Trump is 100% knocked out of the race/locked up before the election, Biden is going to have a tough time facing a real candidate in the GE.

Any elected official that made decisions during covid (starting with the big orange man alllllllllll the way down to the locals) should be held accountable for this. Unexpected mortality rates are 20% higher then average.....why do you suppose that is?

I never mentioned Trump. I will say that this whole thing is totally fucked...and this usually happens when the government is "fixing" something.

Opppppppppps We’re into year three of the COVID-19 pandemic. From mask mandates to vaccine passports, government restrictions on our liberties remain in place. But, thankfully, at least in the US, the era of lockdown orders confining Americans’ to their homes to “slow the spread” is over. Unfortunately, a new meta-analysis of studies shows that all the pain and sacrifice we endured from those orders achieved little—despite their tremendous costs. The new research review was led by economist Steve Hanke and published by Johns Hopkins University. It evaluated 24 relevant studies examining lockdown stringency, the impact of stay-at-home orders, and the effectiveness of specific restrictions. The meta-analysis concludes that “lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality.” Why wouldn’t stay-at-home mandates effectively combat the pandemic? Well, to some extent they simply delayed the inevitable. Plus, research has shown that most COVID-19 spread actually occurred at home. “Micro evidence contradicts the public-health ideal in which households would be places of solitary confinement and zero transmission,” University of Chicago economist Casey B. Mulligan concluded. “Instead, the evidence suggests that ‘households show the highest transmission rates’ and that ‘households are high-risk settings for the transmission of [COVID-19].’” So, however disheartening it may be, it’s hardly surprising that Hanke and co. found such minimal public health impact from lockdown policies. “Stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average,” their new research concludes. "[Stay-in-place orders] were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific [non-pharmaceutical restriction] studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.” But the costs of these draconian measures weren’t minimal at all. They devastated the economy, pummeled the working class, fueled a youth mental health crisis, led to record-breaking drug overdoses, worsened a crime wave, delayed life-saving medical treatments, and so much more. These devastating results offer a vivid reminder of a crucial lesson. When central planners, in their hubris, ignore the fact that their actions will have sweeping consequences beyond their intentions, human suffering ensues. “It’s not enough... to endorse legislation that has a nice title and promises to do something good,” economist Robert P. Murphy wrote for FEE. “People need to think through the full consequences of a policy, because often it will lead to a cure worse than the disease.” When it comes to lockdown policies, the “cure” has indeed proven far more harmful than helpful. https://fee.org/articles/lockdowns-had-little-to-no-effect-on-covid-mortality-new-john-hopkins-study/ What say the resident bootlickers here that we're preaching about saving humankind.... 2 weeks to flatten the curve....blah blah blah.