Pete Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Yeah, this ought to help you fucking asshole clowns get elected. Continued death spiral brought to you by a losing liberal cunt. Be proud dems The Clinton Foundation will not return as much as $250,000 in donations from disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein following the accusations of sexual harassment and rape. The foundation said Sunday that donations, ranging from $100,000 to $250,000, have already been spent on projects, The Daily Mail reported. The move to keep the money was expected following tweets from the foundation’s spokesman Craig Minassian. “Suggesting @ClintonFdn return funds from our 330,000+ donors ignores the fact that donations have been used to help people across the world,” Minassian wrote on Twitter. The calls to return Weinstein’s money were prompted after multiple actresses have come forward and accused the Hollywood executive of sexual assault and rape, forcing numerous politicians and organization to grapple with the dilemma. Dozens Democratic Party politicians – including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Sen. Sen. Al Franken, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Sen. Cory Booker – have pledged to donate their Weinstein’s contributions to charities focused on women’s rights. Hillary Clinton echoed her former colleagues, saying she was “shocked and appalled” after the sexual harassment allegations were revealed about Weinstein, who hosted fundraisers for her in the past and donated more than $46,000 to her recent presidential campaign and other election efforts. "What other people are saying, what my former colleagues are saying, is they're going to donate it to charity, and of course I will do that," she said on CNN. "I give 10% of my income to charity every year, this will be part of that. There's no – there's no doubt about it." Lukas Mikelionis is a reporter for FoxNews.com. Follow him on Twitter @LukasMikelionis. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/16/clinton-foundation-to-keep-harvey-weinsteins-250000-donation.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Both sides. Democrats and Republicans have the blinders on so bad they only see what they want to see. They vote for party not person. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Why would she help create the headline, "Hillary gives money to sexual assaulter"? if the clown posse disagrees with her decision, she's probably making the right one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 I'm on the board of a few charities, the money we collect is used to help people that need it, and haven't people been giving Harvey's money to charity? So now the charities that Harvey has donated to are supposed to do what with the money? /threadend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 1 hour ago, awful knawful said: Both sides. Democrats and Republicans have the blinders on so bad they only see what they want to see. They vote for party not person. I don't see people in my immediate area doing this any longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 (edited) according to some of you dipshits the clinton foundation was dead but you're right though, the foundation should go to charities and expect to get food, meds, and other supplies the foundation helps with, back. Edited October 16, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 another great example of how dumb dopo really is.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 An individual may give a maximum of: $2,700 per election to a federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee.2 Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections. $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC. Hillary Clinton echoed her former colleagues, saying she was “shocked and appalled” after the sexual harassment allegations were revealed about Weinstein, who hosted fundraisers for her in the past and donated more than $46,000 to her recent presidential campaign and other election efforts. Interesting.....gave 250k to Clinton Foundation, and 46k individually for Clinton's campaigns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: according to some of you dipshits the clinton foundation was dead but you're right though, the foundation should go to charities and expect to get food, meds, and other supplies the foundation helps with, back. it is dead . no one working there just a po box . it is used as a personal shelter Edited October 16, 2017 by Ez ryder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, racer254 said: An individual may give a maximum of: $2,700 per election to a federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee.2 Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections. $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC. Hillary Clinton echoed her former colleagues, saying she was “shocked and appalled” after the sexual harassment allegations were revealed about Weinstein, who hosted fundraisers for her in the past and donated more than $46,000 to her recent presidential campaign and other election efforts. Interesting.....gave 250k to Clinton Foundation, and 46k individually for Clinton's campaigns. hmmm, racer might be onto something. why so "interesting"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: it is dead . no one working there just a po box . it is used as a personal shelter um, no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: um, no. ok pull up there employee list for us then . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 2 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: ok pull up there employee list for us then . you show me a link saying I'm wrong... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Shouldn't we be stripping him of his money and giving it to foundations? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 they have the board in place only change is the president steped down and is now just a board member . I do not care to go back and look up the many story's about the Clinton foundation workers stepping down . we know CNN gave it the ofical spin of oh they thought they would be working in the WH . lol I am sure they still get a star eyed interns to run the web site and shuffle papers . fact is the tap has been shut and no one is wasting cash giving to a dead horse with no pull left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 Why would they give the money back lol? That seems counterproductive. They should spend it on rape and sexual assault causes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Shouldn't we be stripping him of his money and giving it to foundations? Neal now we should take all his money ? I dont give a fuck what any one dose with the money he gave personally. but now we should take the guys money and do what the collective thinks is best with it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiSledder Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 If I ran the clinton foundation id donate 250k to a charity that helps women that are victims of sexual abuse 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiSledder Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: now we should take all his money ? I dont give a fuck what any one dose with the money he gave personally. but now we should take the guys money and do what the collective thinks is best with it? Neal is an idiot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 1 minute ago, Ez ryder said: they have the board in place only change is the president steped down and is now just a board member . I do not care to go back and look up the many story's about the Clinton foundation workers stepping down . we know CNN gave it the ofical spin of oh they thought they would be working in the WH . lol I am sure they still get a star eyed interns to run the web site and shuffle papers . fact is the tap has been shut and no one is wasting cash giving to a dead horse with no pull left you are completely full of shit, a victim of right wing spin, which is typical. you're confusing the Clinton global initiative with the Clinton foundation. two different things, and the plan to shelve the global initiative was in place prior to the election. but rww spin machines turned it all around so people like you would think all the donations were stopping because the donors couldn't buy favors anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 6 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: now we should take all his money ? I dont give a fuck what any one dose with the money he gave personally. but now we should take the guys money and do what the collective thinks is best with it? I would have no problem taking nearly all his worth if he is convicted. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 8 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Why would they give the money back lol? That seems counterproductive. They should spend it on rape and sexual assault causes. That gets my vote. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted October 16, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 16, 2017 4 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Why would they give the money back lol? That seems counterproductive. They should spend it on rape and sexual assault causes. I agree, give it to Vera House... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 23 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: hmmm, racer might be onto something. why so "interesting"? How many elections has Clinton been in? I guess it must be a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 6 minutes ago, racer254 said: How many elections has Clinton been in? I guess it must be a lot. several, but again, why so "interesting"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.