Jump to content

Wasserman Schultz' ex-IT aide indicted on 4 counts


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Edmo said:

Sound like ice is with Debbie - These guys did nothing wrong and it's just a vast right wing conspiracy. They'll get their day in court and we shall see how this works out for them. 

Who said they did nothing wrong?

Obviously there's sufficient evidence to bring forward indictments on bank fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

39 minutes ago, Edmo said:

Sound like ice is with Debbie - These guys did nothing wrong and it's just a vast right wing conspiracy. They'll get their day in court and we shall see how this works out for them. 

:lol:

where did any of us say what this guy did was right?

 

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Who said they did nothing wrong?

Obviously there's sufficient evidence to bring forward indictments on bank fraud.

Debbie said it. She kept the guy on as an employee after everyone else bailed on him.

Follow the money. 

Edited by Edmo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

So tell us what you recommend.

I would recommend not letting AIPAC to influence our govt with legislature, policy and diplomacy. Especially in regards to Israel? Or anywhere else? :dunno: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Anler said:

I would recommend not letting AIPAC to influence our govt with legislature, policy and diplomacy. Especially in regards to Israel? Or anywhere else? :dunno: 

Sink one of their ships in retribution for the USS Liberty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Edmo said:

Debbie said it. She kept the guy on as an employee after everyone else bailed on him.

Follow the money. 

Uh huh and?

He still hasn't been charged with anything in relation to the House investigation...and how would she have any idea about him committing bank fraud?  When those details emerged, she cut ties.

:lol:

 

"Ms. Wasserman Schultz held out, arguing that until there was credible evidence, she saw no reason to terminate a longstanding work arrangement. She ultimately did so this week, after getting news of Mr. Awan’s arrest.

"After details of the investigation were reviewed with us, my office was provided no evidence to indicate that laws had been broken, which over time, raised troubling concerns about due process, fair treatment and potential ethnic and religious profiling,” Ms. Wasserman Shultz said on Thursday through a spokesman."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Edmo said:

Debbie said it. She kept the guy on as an employee after everyone else bailed on him.

Follow the money. 

so using that same logic, he should have been fired during the investigation, before the charge?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snoslinger said:

so using that same logic, he should have been fired during the investigation, before the charge?

 

I wasn't in the room, so I don't know everything that happened. It just seems odd everybody dumped him but she kept him on.  :dunno: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Edmo said:

I wasn't in the room, so I don't know everything that happened. It just seems odd everybody dumped him but she kept him on.  :dunno: 

Seems she was the only one not smart enough to jump ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Seems she was the only one not smart enough to jump ship.

 

12 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

 

"Ms. Wasserman Schultz held out, arguing that until there was credible evidence, she saw no reason to terminate a longstanding work arrangement. She ultimately did so this week, after getting news of Mr. Awan’s arrest.

"After details of the investigation were reviewed with us, my office was provided no evidence to indicate that laws had been broken, which over time, raised troubling concerns about due process, fair treatment and potential ethnic and religious profiling,” Ms. Wasserman Shultz said on Thursday through a spokesman."

She kept him on because of all those racists I guess. :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol




×
×
  • Create New...