Jump to content

Goose and gander


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, f7ben said:

no , it hasnt been investigated....its been swept under the rug 

:lmao: 

Just like the repudiation of your Assange bullshit related to Rich :snack:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

:lmao: 

Just like the repudiation of your Assange bullshit related to Rich :snack:

You are just that dumb.....you have no clue how powerful wikileaks is or how it works. You are a fucking moron. Assange is a hero and those with brains know why he posted the reward for info on Rich ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, f7ben said:

You are just that dumb.....you have no clue how powerful wikileaks is or how it works. You are a fucking moron. Assange is a hero and those with brains know why he posted the reward for info on Rich ......

Strange how wikileaks never seems to publish anything negative about the Republicans or Russia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said:

Strange how wikileaks never seems to publish anything negative about the Republicans or Russia

The panama papers were extremely damaging to many russian oligarchs in Putins sphere.....do a little research you inbred little girl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
17 hours ago, SnowRider said:

I watched the Assange interview. Assange was asked why the bombshells he dishonestly promised didn't materialize. Assange's phony excuse was his sources were afraid. Then Assange mentioned Rich as an example of why his leakers are scared. Assange didn't say that Rich was his source. Its dishonest to claim he did. Wikileaks sent out a press release afterwards that denied Assange was in any way trying to imply that Rich was his source.

 

https://www.discussionist.com/10151339823

 

3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

ice and sr you'd have better luck corresponding with this, than ben.

Image result for wall

 

 

 
 

The link fucks up .7 Momo's conspiracy :lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ben's "smoking gun"...

 

On ‎6‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 10:03 AM, f7ben said:

Well , I'd say considering the entire establishment is selling out trying to bury it its going well. Assange said its Rich and he's never lied. Everyone else saying its not Rich with all their might has lied every single fucking time they spoke. You go ahead and continue to be a blind retarded sheep

 

On ‎6‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 10:09 AM, Snoslinger said:

link to assange saying it was rich, please....

 

 

On ‎6‎/‎28‎/‎2017 at 10:12 AM, f7ben said:

"We have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States, and that our sources face serious risks. That's why they come to us so we can protect their anonymity," Assange said.

 
 

He made clear that Rich's case had come to "no conclusion" but that Rich's death was an example of the dangers that could befall whistleblowers – "our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that."

WikiLeaks later offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich's killer, as described by reporter Patrick Madden of NPR member station WAMUin Washington.

 

:lmao:

:lmao:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...