Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 ICE and Snot.... the people the Times and the Post need to hire to refute the nasty AP and their corrections! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snake said: So still.... you were wrong. Appreciate it. nope. 17 agencies support the truth, in that russia meddled in our election. not sure why you're claiming this as a "win" or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: nope. 17 agencies support the truth, in that russia meddled in our election. not sure why you're claiming this as a "win" or something. Explain the corrections. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 5 minutes ago, Snake said: Explain the corrections. more clarification? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 Yah....Clapper would never lie lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 when you find that link showing where any of the 17 don't agree with this matter, you may have something. you don't even know the specific details of this. were the details shared with all the 17 department heads, and they all agreed, before the statement was released? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: Yah....Clapper would never lie lol weren't you one of the clapper supporters not long ago? "no collusion" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 39 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: "Director of National Intelligence James Clapper affirmed an Oct. 7 joint statement from 17 intelligence agencies that the Russian government directed the election interference — and went further. "We stand more resolutely on that statement," Clapper said during a Senate Armed Services hearing with the intelligence chiefs into the politically charged issue." let me dumb it down for soe of you - NYPD investigates a big case and 4 of their teams do an investigation. they conclude suspect A committed the crime. soon afterwards they announce "the NYPD has concluded suspect A is guilty and has been arrested" pro-suspect A, anti-NYPD whackos: "hey look, not every department in the NYPD investigated the matter. suspect A is innocent" That cocksucking fuckhead Clapper who was a proven liar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 selective liars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: selective liars Just when it fits their clown narrative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 14 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: weren't you one of the clapper supporters not long ago? "no collusion" Ahh...no dumbfuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 So which is it? Is the media right or wrong. Simple yes or no would suffice. Which is usually more accurate? The details and 'conclusions' from before, or the ones now after NEW FACTS OMG!!!!!1111 are presented? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted July 1, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 1, 2017 10 minutes ago, f7ben said: Ahh...no dumbfuck The fact that he missed your endless criticism of Clapper is just another example of his idiocy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 Snake with the mega owned Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 26 minutes ago, Snake said: So which is it? Is the media right or wrong. Simple yes or no would suffice. Which is usually more accurate? The details and 'conclusions' from before, or the ones now after NEW FACTS OMG!!!!!1111 are presented? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 Lol poor icewoman is a hurtIn unit these days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Snake said: So which is it? Is the media right or wrong. Simple yes or no would suffice. Which is usually more accurate? The details and 'conclusions' from before, or the ones now after NEW FACTS OMG!!!!!1111 are presented? no 45 minutes ago, f7ben said: Ahh...no dumbfuck i must have confused you with some of the other clowns when they tried using him as evidence that there's no collusion evidence i know you're not a fan in general of the man, like everyone else in the gov Edited July 1, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: no i must have confused you with some of the other clowns when they tried using him as evidence that there's no collusion evidence Smarter than the average bear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snake said: Smarter than the average bear. at least i know how to ask a question. first you ask right or wrong, then follow it with a "yes or no would suffice". so how you do know what my answer is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: at least i know how to ask a question. first you ask right or wrong, then follow it with a "yes or no would suffice". so how you do know what my answer is? That's kinda the point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 “This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the National Security Agency (NSA), which draws on intelligence information collected and disseminated by those three agencies.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 FRANKEN: And I want to thank General Clapper and – and Attorney General Yates for – for appearing today. We have – the intelligence communities have concluded all 17 of them that Russia interfered with this election. And we all know how that’s right. CLAPPER: Senator, as I pointed out in my statement Senator Franken, it was there were only three agencies that directly involved in this assessment plus my office… FRANKEN: But all 17 signed on to that? CLAPPER: Well, we didn’t go through that – that process, this was a special situation because of the time limits and my – what I knew to be to who could really contribute to this and the sensitivity of the situation, we decided it was a constant judgment to restrict it to those three. I’m not aware of anyone who dissented or – or disagreed when it came out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.