f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) https://www.intellihub.com/new-information-suggests-guccifer-2-0-leak-was-a-dnc-ruse-fabricated-by-warren-flood/ The metadata embedded within the Wikileaks emails, when compared to the metadata released by ‘Guccifer 2.0,’ doesn’t match up and is not the same (i.e. the files released by Guccifer 2.0 are not the same files released by Wikileaks). What the metadata actually shows is that the Wikileaks files clearly were taken from DNC Research Director Lauren Dillon’s computer and not Warren Floods who used Microsoft Office to create the document. Guccifer 2.0 originated from inside the DNC ......fact Edited June 30, 2017 by f7ben 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 30, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: https://www.intellihub.com/new-information-suggests-guccifer-2-0-leak-was-a-dnc-ruse-fabricated-by-warren-flood/ The metadata embedded within the Wikileaks emails, when compared to the metadata released by ‘Guccifer 2.0,’ doesn’t match up and is not the same (i.e. the files released by Guccifer 2.0 are not the same files released by Wikileaks). What the metadata actually shows is that the Wikileaks files clearly were taken from DNC Research Director Lauren Dillon’s computer and not Warren Floods who used Microsoft Office to create the document. Guccifer 2.0 originated from inside the DNC ......fact American LE and Intelligence services did not even get to study the hardware (servers). Clinton would let them. I'd be curious to know who this outside party was who "examined" the servers or computers. Edited June 30, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: American LE and Intelligence services did not even get to study the hardware (servers). Clinton would let them. I'd be curious to know who this outside party was who "examined" the servers or computers. It was probably some pawn tech company with "ties" to the Clinton Foundation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 30, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 30, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: It was probably some pawn tech company with "ties" to the Clinton Foundation Funny how we have no idea who it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 You need a binky and a warm bottle of milk icewoman? You need someone to hold your hand and tell you whats real and fake? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 Its real Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 You've lost it dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 http://bigleaguepolitics.com/hacker-guccifer-2-0-planted-fake-russian-fingerprints-account/ yup , it wasnt the russians as we all knew ....most of us anyways. The US government has been lying their ass off once again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: You've lost it dude yah , you believe the government story.....they never lie about big shit like this do they ....idiot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 6 minutes ago, f7ben said: yah , you believe the government story.....they never lie about big shit like this do they ....idiot Will this one go farther than the Seth Rich BS? Or the Comet Ping Pong BS? Or the birther BS? Or... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 3 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Will this one go farther than the Seth Rich BS? Or the Comet Ping Pong BS? Or the birther BS? Or... Dont lump the Rich case in with that other bullshit. The rich case has many high profile people pushing for the truth in various court cases. You are just too dumb and brainwashed to even scratch the surface of accepting anything other than the mainstream line thats fed to you by people that have been proven over and over and over to lie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: Dont lump the Rich case in with that other bullshit. The rich case has many high profile people pushing for the truth in various court cases. You are just too dumb and brainwashed to even scratch the surface of accepting anything other than the mainstream line thats fed to you by people that have been proven over and over and over to lie Okay, whatever you say. I'm sure you're really on to something this time here! Edited June 30, 2017 by ICEMAN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: Okay, whatever you say. I'm sure you're really on to something this time here! Do you dispute the info that whistleblowers and wikileaks have provided? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, f7ben said: Do you dispute the info that whistleblowers and wikileaks have provided? I haven't had time to verify the authenticity of millions of pages of hacked documents, so I really can't answer that. However, the timing of the document dumps during the election show that Assange is anything but trustworthy and unbiased. The IC has also stated that he's working with the Russians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 3 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: I haven't had time to verify the authenticity of millions of pages of hacked documents, so I really can't answer that. However, the timing of the document dumps during the election show that Assange is anything but trustworthy and unbiased. The IC has also stated that he's working with the Russians. sweet fuck are you a moron .....just dumb as fuck Assange gives the Intel community a black eye everytime he dumps info.....what the fuck do you think they are gonna say. Assange had dirt on Hillary and gave it to the american people as a gift .......it was a fantastic offering and every citizen should appreciate knowing just how corrupt she was and is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted June 30, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 30, 2017 10 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: I haven't had time to verify the authenticity of millions of pages of hacked documents, so I really can't answer that. However, the timing of the document dumps during the election show that Assange is anything but trustworthy and unbiased. The IC has also stated that he's working with the Russians. Says the guy who gets his info from CNN and MSNBC.. How the fuck do you even type this stuff?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 Just now, Rigid1 said: Says the guy who gets his info from CNN and MSNBC.. How the fuck do you even type this stuff?? He's a fucking moron , thats how CNN has been proven to lie over and over and over .....the government has been proven to lie every single time something important is discussed. But Assange , who has never been proven to have lied one single time doesnt meet Icewoman's standards for integrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rw06GT Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 53 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: I've lost it dude Long fucking time ago, idiot. Do you even know what metadata is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Wait... does this mean the DNC is Russian? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 So Guccifer is a creation of the DNC? He doesn't actually exist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: So Guccifer is a creation of the DNC? He doesn't actually exist? nobody knows ....what they do know for a fact is the docs that Guccifer claimed to have hacked were originated from one single microsoft OS registered to a DNC tech Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: nobody knows ....what they do know for a fact is the docs that Guccifer claimed to have hacked were originated from one single microsoft OS registered to a DNC tech So why would this person then go public and claim responsibility for the hacking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 30, 2017 Author Share Posted June 30, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: So why would this person then go public and claim responsibility for the hacking? I have no clue , the docs in his possession which were used a proof that he committed the "hack" were embedded with traces proving they were not the same docs as the ones wikileaks dumped. The wiki docs came from another source. Past that who knows whats going on.....but once again it is a fact that we are being lied to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 13 minutes ago, f7ben said: I have no clue , the docs in his possession which were used a proof that he committed the "hack" were embedded with traces proving they were not the same docs as the ones wikileaks dumped. The wiki docs came from another source. Past that who knows whats going on.....but once again it is a fact that we are being lied to So the USIC and these cyber security firms CrowdStrike,[18][19] Fidelis Cybersecurity,[19][20]Fireeye's Mandiant,[19] SecureWorks,[21]ThreatConnect,[22] Trend Micro,[23] are all in on the conspiracy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.