Jump to content

Republicare Bill revealed


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

America, land of the hypocrites.  

Full-Coverage Unborn Victim States (29)

(States With Homicide Laws That Recognize Unborn Children as Victims Throughout the Period of Pre-natal Development)

Alabama: Legislation taking effect July 1, 2006 (HB 19) amended Section 13A-6-1 of the Code of Alabama to include “an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability” as a “person” and “human being” for purposes of the state laws dealing with murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, and assault.

Alaska: Alaska Statutes 11.41 (as amended by Senate Bill 20, enacted June 16, 2006) establishes the crimes of “murder of an unborn child,” “manslaughter of an unborn child,” “criminally negligent homicide of an unborn child,” and “assault of an unborn child.” Alaska Statutes 11.81.900(b) defines “unborn child” as “a member of species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.”

Arizona:  The “unborn child in the womb at any stage of its development” is fully covered by the state’s murder and manslaughter statutes.  For purposes of establishing the level of punishment, a victim who is “an unborn child shall be treated like a minor who is under twelve years of age.”  Senate Bill 1052, signed into law on April 25, 2005, amending the following sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes:  13-604, 13-604.01, 13-703, 13-1102, 13-1103, 13-1104, 13-1105, 13-4062, 31-412, 41-1604.11 and 41-1604.13.

Arkansas:  Effective in August, 2013, the killing of an “unborn child” is capital murder, murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, manslaughter, or negligent homicide. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 5-1-102(13)(b)(i)(a), read with Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 5-10-101 to 5-10-105. (A separate Arkansas law makes it a battery to cause injury to a woman during a Class A misdemeanor to cause her to undergo a miscarriage or stillbirth, or to cause injury under conditions manifesting extreme indifference to human life and that results in a miscarriage or stillbirth. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 5-13-201 (a)(5)(a).) Until August, 2013, “unborn child” was defined as a fetus of 12 weeks or older, but Act 1032 of the 2013 Regular Session (SB 417) changed the definition to “offspring of human beings from conception until birth.”

Florida: The “Florida Unborn Victims of Violence Act,” effective October 1, 2014, provides that generally, any person who while committing a crime “causes the death of, or bodily injury to, an unborn child commits a separate offense,” and that the punishment “is the same as the punishment provided . . . had the injury or death occurred to the mother of the unborn child,” except that the death penalty may not be imposed. The law defines “unborn child” as “a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.” Florida Statutes section 775.021 (5).

Georgia: Legislation taking effect July 1, 2006 (SB 77) recognizes an “unborn child” (defined as “a member of the species homo sapiens at any stage of development who is carried in the womb”) as a victim of the offenses of feticide, voluntary manslaughter of an unborn child, assault of an unborn child, and battery of an unborn child. (Official Code of Georgia Annotated, Sections 16-5-20, 16-5-28, 16-5-29, 16-5-80) Legislation (SB 529) taking effect July 1, 2008 recognizes the crimes of “feticide by vehicle” in the first and second degree.  (Section 40-6-393.1)

Idaho: Murder is defined as the killing of a “human embryo or fetus” under certain conditions. The law provides that manslaughter includes the unlawful killing of a human embryo or fetus without malice. The law provides that a person commits aggravated battery when, in committing battery upon the person of a pregnant female, that person causes great bodily harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement to an embryo or fetus. Idaho Sess. Law Chap. 330 (SB1344)(2002).

Illinois: The killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is intentional homicide, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide. Ill. Comp. Stat. ch. 720, §§5/9-1.2, 5/9-2.1, 5/9-3.2 (1993). Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 720 § 5/12-3.1. A person commits battery of an unborn child if he intentionally or knowingly without legal justification and by any means causes bodily harm to an unborn child. Read with Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 720 § 5/12-4.4.

Kansas: Under “Alexa’s Law,” signed into law on May 9, 2007, as part of HB 2062, effective July 1, 2007, an “unborn child,” meaning “a living individual organism of the species homo sapiens, in utero, at any stage of gestation from fertilization to birth,” is defined as a “person” and a “human being” for the purposes of the Kansas statutes against first degree murder, second degree murder, capital murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, vehicular homicide, and numerous battery offenses.

Kentucky:  Since February, 2004, Kentucky law establishes a crime of “fetal homicide” in the first, second, third, and fourth degrees.  The law covers an “unborn child,” defined as “a member of the species homo sapiens in utero from conception onward, without regard to age, health, or condition of dependency.”

Louisiana: The killing of an “unborn child” is first degree feticide, second degree feticide, or third degree feticide. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§14:32.5 – 14.32.8, read with §§14:2(1), (7), (11) (West 1997).

Michigan: The killing of an “unborn quick child” is manslaughter under Mich. Stat. Ann. § 28.555. The Supreme Court of Michigan interpreted this statute to apply to only those unborn children who are viable. Larkin v. Cahalan, 208 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 1973). However, a separate Michigan law, effective Jan. 1, 1999, provides felony penalties for actions that intentionally, or in wanton or willful disregard for consequences, cause a “miscarriage or stillbirth,” or cause “aggravated physical injury to an embryo or fetus.”(M.C.L. 750.90a through 750.90f)

Minnesota: Since 1986 the killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is murder (first, second, or third degree) or manslaughter, (first or second degree). It is also a felony to cause the death of an “unborn child” during the commission of a felony. Minn. Stat. Ann. §§609.266, 609.2661- 609.2665, 609.268(1) (West 1987). The death of an “unborn child” through operation of a motor vehicle is criminal vehicular operation. Minn. Stat. Ann. §609.21 (West 1999).

Mississippi:  Under a law enacted May 6, 2004, and effective July 1, 2004, for purposes of enumerated state laws dealing with various types of homicide and certain other violent crimes, “the term ‘human being’ includes an unborn child at every stage of gestation from conception until live birth and the term ‘unborn child’ means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.”  (SB 2869) In 2011, the legislature revised the law to clarify that certain conduct resulting in “serious physical injury to the embryo or fetus” is a felony punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment. (SB No. 2615, signed February 24, 2011, effective July 1, 2011.)

Missouri: The killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is involuntary manslaughter or first degree murder. Mo. Ann. Stat. §§1.205, 565.024, 565.020 (Vernon Supp. 1999), State v. Knapp, 843 S.W.2d 345 (Mo. 1992), State v. Holcomb, 956 S.W.2d 286 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997).

Nebraska: The killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is murder in the first degree, second degree, or manslaughter. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-391 to § 28-394. (2002) In addition, “The Assault of an Unborn Child Act,” effective April 13, 2006, provides that a criminal attacker who causes “serious bodily injury” to an unborn child commits the offense of “assault on an unborn child” in the first, second, or third degree. “Unborn child” is defined as “an individual member of the species Homo sapiens at any stage of development in utero.” (LB 57, 2006)

North Carolina:  House Bill 215, titled the Unborn Victims of Violence Act / Ethen’s Law, signed April 29, 2011 and effective December 1, 2011, recognizes an “unborn child” (defined as “a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb”) as a victim for the crimes of “murder of an unborn child,” “voluntary manslaughter of an unborn child,” “involuntary manslaughter of an unborn child,” “assault inflicting serious bodily injury on an unborn child,” and “battery of an unborn child.” (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-23.1-14-23.8).

North Dakota: Since 1987 the killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is murder, felony murder, manslaughter, or negligent homicide. N.D. Cent. Code §§12.1-17.1-01 to 12.1-17.1-04 (1997).

Ohio: At any stage of pre-natal development, if an “unborn member of the species homo sapiens, who is or was carried in the womb of another” is killed, it is aggravated murder, murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, negligent homicide, aggravated vehicular homicide, and vehicular homicide. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 2903.01 to 2903.07, 2903.09 (Anderson 1996 & Supp. 1998).

Oklahoma:  House Bill 1686, signed into law on May 20, 2005, recognizes “an unborn child” as a victim under state laws against murder, manslaughter, and certain other acts of violence.  The law defines “unborn child” as “the unborn offspring of human beings from the moment of conception, through pregnancy, and until live birth including the human conceptus, zygote, morula, blastocyst, embryo and fetus.” Following upon the law enacted in 2005, Senate Bill 1742, signed into law May 23, 2006, ensures that Oklahoma’s recognition of the unborn child as a separate victim applies uniformly across all of Oklahoma’s homicide statutes.

Pennsylvania: An individual commits criminal homicide in the first, second, or third-degree, or voluntary manslaughter of an “unborn child” if the individual intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of an unborn child. 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. §§ 2601 to 2609 (1997)  “Unborn child” and “fetus.” Each term shall mean an individual organism of the species Homo sapiens from fertilization until live birth.”  On December 27, 2006, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Bullock (J-43-2006), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously rejected an array of constitutional challenges to the law, including claims based on Roe v. Wade and equal protection doctrine.

South Carolina: S. 1084, signed into law and effective on June 2, 2006, recognizes a “child in utero” who is enjured or killed during an act of criminal violence as a separate victim of a separate offense. The term “child in utero” is defined as “a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.”

South Dakota: The killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is fetal homicide, manslaughter, or vehicular homicide. S.D. Codified Laws Ann. §22-16-1, 22-16-1.1, 22-16-15(5), 22-16-20, and 22-16-41, read with §§ 22-1-2(31), 22-1-2(50A) (Supp. 1997).

Tennessee: Effective July 1, 2012 (HB 3517, enacted as Pub. Ch. 1006), Tennessee law includes “a human embryo or fetus at any stage of gestation in utero” as a victim of such offenses as murder, voluntary manslaughter, vehicular homicide, and reckless homicide. See Tennessee Code Annotated, Sections 39-13-107 and 39-13-214. This law replaces a law that took effect in 2011, which had applied the same principle to “a fetus of a human being.” The new language is intended to ensure that the protection extends throughout the period of pre-natal development, along with other technical changes. Prior to 2011, Tennessee law recognized an unborn child as a crime victim only after “viability.”

Texas: Under a law signed June 20, 2003, and effective September 1, 2003, the protections of the entire criminal code extend to “an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.” The law does not apply to “conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child” or to “a lawful medical procedure performed by a physican or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent.” (SB 319, Prenatal Protection Act)

Utah: The killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is treated as any other homicide. Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-201 et seq. (Supp. 1998)and UT SB 178 (2002).  See Utah Supreme Court decision in State of Utah v. MacGuire (January 23, 2004).

Virginia:  Effective July 1, 2004, Code of Virginia Section 18.2-32.2 provides:  “Any person who unlawfully, willfully, deliberately, maliciously and with premeditation kills the fetus of another” may be imprisoned from 20 years to life; and any person who does so without premeditation may be imprisoned for not less than five nor more than 40 years.

West Virginia:  2005 Senate Bill 146, signed into law on May 20, 2005, provided that “a pregnant woman and the embryo or fetus she is carrying in the womb constitute separate and distinct victims” for purposes of the state laws governing murder, manslaughter, and certain other crimes of violence.  Code of West Virginia Section 61-2-30.

Wisconsin:  Since 1998 the killing of an “unborn child” at any stage of pre-natal development is first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, second-degree intentional homicide, second-degree reckless homicide, homicide by negligent handling of dangerous weapon, explosives or fire, homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle or firearm, or homicide by negligent operation of vehicle. Wis. Stat. Ann. §§939.75, 939.24, 939.25, 940.01, 940.02, 940.05, 940.06, 940.08, 940.09, 940.10 (West 1998).

Partial-Coverage Unborn Victim States (8)

(States with Homicide Laws That Recognize Unborn Children as Victims, But only During Part of the Period of Pre-natal Development)

NOTE: These laws are gravely deficient because they do not recognize unborn children as victims during certain periods of their pre-natal development. Nevertheless, they are described here for informational purposes.

California:  California Penal Code § 187(a) says, “Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.”  The words “or a fetus” were added by the legislature in 1970.  The California Supreme Court later interpreted “fetus” to apply “beyond the embryonic stage of seven to eight weeks.”  (People v. Davis, 1994) In addition, Penal Code  § 190.2(3) makes a defendant eligible for capital punishment if convicted of more than one murder, and the California Supreme Court ruled that fetal homicide is included under this provision as well (People v. Dennis, 1998).

Indiana: The killing of “a fetus that has attained viability” is murder, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter.  Indiana Code 35-42-1-1, 35-42-1-3, 35-42-1-4.

Maryland:  Under 2005 House Bill 398, amending Section 2-103 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, signed into law on May 26, 2005 and effective October 1, 2005, “A prosecution may be instituted for murder or manslaughter of a viable fetus,” if the person prosecuted “intended to cause the death of the viable fetus, intended to cause serious physical injury to the viable fetus, or wantonly or recklessly disregarded the likelihood that the person’s actions would cause the death of or serious physical injury to the viable fetus.”

Massachusetts: The killing of an unborn child after viability is vehicular homicide. Commonwealth v. Cass, 467 N.E.2d 1324 (Mass. 1984). The killing of an unborn child after viability is involuntary manslaughter. Commonwealth v. Lawrence, 536 N.E.2d 571 (Mass. 1989).

Montana: In 2013, the Montana legislature enacted a law under which it is, depending on the circumstances, “deliberate homicide” or “mitigated deliberate homicide” if a person “purposely or knowingly causes the death of the a fetus of another with knowledge that the woman is pregnant.” The bill defines “fetus” as “an organism of the species homo sapiens from 8 weeks of development until complete expulsion or extraction from a woman’s body.” (HB104, amending Sections 45-5-102 and 45-5-103, Montana Code Annotated.)

Nevada: The killing of an “unborn quick child” is manslaughter. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.210 (1997.

Rhode Island: The killing of an “unborn quick child” is manslaughter. The statute defines “quick child” to mean a viable child. R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-23-5 (1994).

Washington: The killing of an “unborn quick child” is manslaughter. Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 9A.32.060(1)(b) (West Supp. 1999).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Angry ginger said:

if your on the dole abortion really should be required,  would save us from the creation of the generations of welfare rats that the right likes to rant about.  

 

 

 

I would prefer some form of permanent or maybe reversible birth control to abortion.  Taking the life on an unborn child in the third trimester is wrong IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said:

I would prefer some form of permanent or maybe reversible birth control to abortion.  Taking the life on an unborn child in the third trimester is wrong IMO.

It's fucking murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

add up the cost of all those births medicare paid for plus the amount being paid to provided welfare benefits to those mother/kids it's clearly in the hundreds of millions.  How many of them would have chosen an abortion if you jsut threw them a little bonus on top of paying for it, i'm betting a pretty significant number.  Worlds got plenty of people in it we don't need to add more that are disadvantaged from the go

Again you totally overlook the other consequences of abortion.   From effects on women's health to societal impacts.  Where you think it saves costs us more elsewhere.  The mere fact that fathers walk away from a child's life because he thinks the mother should have gotten an abortion is unmeasurable both in terms of economically and socially.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

I would prefer some form of permanent or maybe reversible birth control to abortion.  Taking the life on an unborn child in the third trimester is wrong IMO.

How is it any different than the 2nd trimester?   IMHO once the heart is beating human life has began.  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

yup

 

it's not  a child until it can live on it's own,  prior to that it's a growth that can easily be removed and save hundreds of millions of $

NSFW

Keep parroting that line if it makes you feel better about it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pretty sure this guy woulda been fine.

david.jpg

Edited by Snake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's fucking murder.

Absolutely. 

19 minutes ago, Highmark said:

How is it any different than the 2nd trimester?   IMHO once the heart is beating human life has began.  

With modern medicine one could argue a 2nd trimester birth could live outside the womb. It happens quite regularly with planned pregnancies.  Im not an expert on life or if a 1st trimester child could live outside the womb. 

I am against abortion in many instances but not all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

Absolutely. 

With modern medicine one could argue a 2nd trimester birth could live outside the womb. It happens quite regularly with planned pregnancies.  Im not an expert on life or if a 1st trimester child could live outside the womb. 

I am against abortion in many instances but not all. 

Ding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Snake said:

Let's mandate white babies be aborted, like the left likes to rant about. :news:

maybe hat would finally wipe out the white privlege we all enjoy :bc:

 

 

 

 

well except me-  being a gingers worse than being black.  kids today all want to be balck,  no one wants to be a ginger.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
20 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

maybe hat would finally wipe out the white privlege we all enjoy :bc:

 

 

 

 

well except me-  being a gingers worse than being black.  kids today all want to be balck,  no one wants to be a ginger.

 

 

 

Its why we are not so hard on you, we all feel sorry for gingers. :lol:  :taunt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

maybe hat would finally wipe out the white privlege we all enjoy :bc:

 

 

 

 

well except me-  being a gingers worse than being black.  kids today all want to be balck,  no one wants to be a ginger.

 

 

 

I wonder how this poor kid feelsmain-qimg-741921ffa00fda04242c7d909c8d464c-c

 

:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
5 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

IMG_7438.JPG

 

Never forget where you came from........truer words could not be said. Except turtle boy.

Oops!  What a bunch of fucking idiots.  

http://www.snopes.com/mitch-mcconnell-polio-government-healthcare/

CLAIM

The U.S. government funded Mitch McConnell's care and rehabilitation when he had polio as a child.

RATING

det-red.gif FALSE

ORIGIN

On 22 June 2017, the Occupy Democrats Facebook page posted a meme claiming that the United States government paid for Mitch McConnell’s care and rehabilitation when the Republican senior senator contracted polio as an infant in the 1940s.

This claim is contrasted, in the meme, with McConnell’s support for the Senate Republican health care plan published that day:

As a kid, Mitch McConnell had polio, and the government paid for ALL of his care and rehabilitation. Now, as the leader of the Republicans in the Senate, McConnell is taking government-funded care away from tens of millions of Americans. Let that sink in.

However, neither this particular center nor the care given to McConnell were government-funded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Oops!  What a bunch of fucking idiots.  

http://www.snopes.com/mitch-mcconnell-polio-government-healthcare/

CLAIM

The U.S. government funded Mitch McConnell's care and rehabilitation when he had polio as a child.

RATING

det-red.gif FALSE

ORIGIN

On 22 June 2017, the Occupy Democrats Facebook page posted a meme claiming that the United States government paid for Mitch McConnell’s care and rehabilitation when the Republican senior senator contracted polio as an infant in the 1940s.

This claim is contrasted, in the meme, with McConnell’s support for the Senate Republican health care plan published that day:

As a kid, Mitch McConnell had polio, and the government paid for ALL of his care and rehabilitation. Now, as the leader of the Republicans in the Senate, McConnell is taking government-funded care away from tens of millions of Americans. Let that sink in.

However, neither this particular center nor the care given to McConnell were government-funded.

MC was just fishing. As usual he hooked himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McConnell was cared for at the Roosevelt Warm Springs Institute a state and government funded rehab center. It was founded by Presodent Roosevelt.

I will say again he forgets where he came from the fuckin scumbag.

Edited by Mainecat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
On 6/23/2017 at 1:49 PM, Mainecat said:

McConnell was cared for at the Roosevelt Warm Springs Institute a state and government funded rehab center. It was founded by Presodent Roosevelt.

I will say again he forgets where he came from the fuckin scumbag.

How about you and where you come from....seems all you do is brag about hanging around the pool drinking expensive booze and smoking cigars....you helping anybody or just running your cock holster?

FTR I'm not a fan of McConnell.

Edited by Biggie Smails
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Biggie Smails said:

How about you and where you come from....seems all you do is brag about hanging around the pool drinking expensive booze and smoking cigars....you helping anybody or just running your cock holster?

FTR I'm not a fan of McConnell.

I'm running my cock holster....whatever that means. WTF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...