Jump to content

Can someone post up actual evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russian's?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

15 minutes ago, Skidooski said:

10 Posts by Slinger already in this thread and still nada :lol: 

please, go to the right and stay there. you're too fucking dumb to be left leaning. I already responded to the dumb question. you are aware there is an investigation going on, right? duh.

 

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

and while you're at it dumbski, take a crack at answering the question snakey is avoiding.

I just saw the fucking thing you cunt. Fuck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Snake said:

 

I just saw the fucking thing you cunt. Fuck off.

He was taking a shot at me in anger. His party lost big time, they are all pissed off and desperately looking to blame it on anyone or anything else but themselves. It's fucking comical as hell to watch but like most dumb comedies, it get's old fast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close.

here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? :dunno:

 

Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July.

Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee?  

Hillary's secret server/classified email info hurt her WAY more than the DNC emails especially when they showed up on a pedophiles laptop and Comey had no choice but to look into it.   THAT is what hurt Hillary the most.   Are you claiming Russia and Trump had something to do with that? :lol:  

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July.

Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee?  

and? why do you always counter a debate about topic a with a deflection to topic b?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close.

here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? :dunno:

 

 

10 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Wikilieaks was coming out with shit in July.

Why did NBC sit on the Trump tapes so long if it was news unless only to damage the GOP elected nominee?  

Hillary's secret server/classified email info hurt her WAY more than the DNC emails especially when they showed up on a pedophiles laptop and Comey had no choice but to look into it.   THAT is what hurt Hillary the most.   Are you claiming Russia and Trump had something to do with that? :lol:  

 

6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

and? why do you always counter a debate about topic a with a deflection to topic b?

 

Follow along SnoClinger.

You claimed they (easy to assume you meant Russia and Trump) did it right around the election which was false.   It started in July.

My counter debate ties directly into your claim.  If other that to have the most impact on the election why did NBC wait?

Hillary got undone by her own doing.   Her deciding not to engage parts of the American voter and her email server.   Of all the Wikileaks stuff even you guys admitted many times had relatively little to do with Hillary herself but WAY more her staff and the media.  I followed the Wikileaks stuff more than most and I can't even recall her personal emails being all that damaging.   

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

:lol: so wtf were they then, strategically placed around the election?

 

They did it to hurt the future President of the country. You remember, Mrs. 95% on election night?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

:lol: there's the preview of coming attractions. a dumb fucking question as well.

Another Non-answer.

1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

perfect example of the lack of critical thinking skills in this place. a shitload of incriminating stuff is released by groups of people obviously wanting to affect our election. then some dipshits ask how it affected the election :lol:

take Russia out of it if you like. why did wikileaks reveal the information?

 

 

And another.  But what does Russia have to do with Wikileaks?  Assange said it in no way came from them. :dunno:

 

1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

well let's see. I'd bet a paycheck that many of those trump, or 3rd party votes, would have gone to Hillary had all the wikileaks damage not occurred. enough to give Hillary the swing states at least, as the votes were close.

here's a question for you - if it didn't do anything, why did they do it, right around the election? :dunno:

 

Again...what does Russia have to do with this?  Maybe you tards should be blaming Assange for unwrapping your little crap show.  Yes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Another Non-answer.

And another.  But what does Russia have to do with Wikileaks?  Assange said it in no way came from them. :dunno:

 

Again...what does Russia have to do with this?  Maybe you tards should be blaming Assange for unwrapping your little crap show.  Yes?

so you saw I answered the question yet still claim "non-answer"? wtf is with you?

as far as snake's response? :lol: why wouldn't they have waited until after the election to do all that. quit playing dumb, dude.

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, f7ben said:

not a "state actor" ....... that means associated with

"that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party"

that doesn't clear clear up anything Benjamin. the source could be another Russian entity backed by Moscow, yet they could still make that claim. for Christ's sake dude, everyone knows Russia had their hands in all this.

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

"that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party"

that doesn't clear clear up anything Benjamin. the source could be another Russian entity backed by Moscow, yet they could still make that claim. for Christ's sake dude, everyone knows Russia had their hands in all this.

no , they dont.....you are swallowing a load of bullshit from people who's job is to lie to you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snoslinger said:

so you saw I answered the question yet still claim "non-answer"? wtf is with you?

as far as snake's response? :lol: why wouldn't they have waited until after the election to do all that. quit playing dumb, dude.

Who is "they"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol




×
×
  • Create New...