spin_dry Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 https://www.google.com/amp/www.cnbc.com/amp/2016/11/29/new-york-times-subscriptions-soar-tenfold-after-donald-trump-wins-presidency.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 28, 2017 Author Share Posted February 28, 2017 https://qz.com/901684/thanks-to-trump-the-new-york-times-added-more-subscribers-in-three-months-than-in-all-of-2015/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rw06GT Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold, adding 132,000, after Trump's win A whole 132,000. In a city of how many million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 28, 2017 Author Share Posted February 28, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rw06GT said: New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold, adding 132,000, after Trump's win A whole 132,000. In a city of how many million. the NYT pulls down almost $2billion/yr. how much do you get out of that trust fund again? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 The NYT has been swirling the toilet bowl for a decade, what little boost they get will still not change the inevitable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, 01mxz800 said: The NYT has been swirling the toilet bowl for a decade, what little boost they get will still not change the inevitable Correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 15 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Correct. Blatently Incorrect actually, dummy 20 minutes ago, 01mxz800 said: The NYT has been swirling the toilet bowl for a decade, what little boost they get will still not change the inevitable Wrong. Print media has, the NYT is a positive anomaly in an otherwise dead business. They have the highest digital subscription base of ANY publication, and their total readership is still higher than pre-digital publications. Most papers are well below their pre digital numbers or long gone. Totally clueless you are 41 minutes ago, Rw06GT said: New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold, adding 132,000, after Trump's win A whole 132,000. In a city of how many million. They only have about 1.6 million subscribers, which is huge actually. Another know nothing moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted February 28, 2017 Author Share Posted February 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Catman said: Blatently Incorrect actually, dummy Wrong. Print media has, the NYT is a positive anomaly in an otherwise dead business. They have the highest digital subscription base of ANY publication, and their total readership is still higher than pre-digital publications. Most papers are well below their pre digital numbers or long gone. Totally clueless you are They only have about 1.6 million subscribers, which is huge actually. Another know nothing moron warren buffet recently said that two mega newspapers will survive. the nyt was one. republicans hate the times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted February 28, 2017 Share Posted February 28, 2017 1 minute ago, Catman said: Blatently Incorrect actually, dummy Wrong. Print media has, the NYT is a positive anomaly in an otherwise dead business. They have the highest digital subscription base of ANY publication, and their total readership is still higher than pre-digital publications. Most papers are well below their pre digital numbers or long gone. Totally clueless you are They only have about 1.6 million subscribers, which is huge actually. Another know nothing moron The NYT is no better than picking a national enquirier, daily news or any other shit rag, I am old enough to where I prefer reading my news in black and white print but for the most part newspapers are dead and any online copy of said papers is nothing more than telling you what to think, the only thing I buy papers for now is to check the police beats, obits and laugh at the letters to the editor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 32 minutes ago, Catman said: Blatently Incorrect actually, dummy Wrong. Print media has, the NYT is a positive anomaly in an otherwise dead business. They have the highest digital subscription base of ANY publication, and their total readership is still higher than pre-digital publications. Most papers are well below their pre digital numbers or long gone. Totally clueless you are They only have about 1.6 million subscribers, which is huge actually. Another know nothing moron Thanks for making my point. They've still seen ad revenue decline for 25 years. And NYT is widely regarded as part of the MSM problem today for trying to shape the narrative and agenda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Trump saves more American jobs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Times is a good paper, glad their online reading resets based on ip so everyday when i log into my system i get another 10 articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 2 hours ago, 01mxz800 said: The NYT has been swirling the toilet bowl for a decade, what little boost they get will still not change the inevitable Internet news is killing most old print newspapers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 Maddows numbers are up bigley too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: Times is a good paper, glad their online reading resets based on ip so everyday when i log into my system i get another 10 articles. The gray lady hasn't been the same since Jr. took over. Fuck him and fuck his newspaper. Too big and needs to fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 hour ago, 01mxz800 said: The NYT is no better than picking a national enquirier, daily news or any other shit rag, I am old enough to where I prefer reading my news in black and white print but for the most part newspapers are dead and any online copy of said papers is nothing more than telling you what to think, the only thing I buy papers for now is to check the police beats, obits and laugh at the letters to the editor Doesn't surprise me in the slightest that's what you read for. and you were still dead fucking wrong in your assessment. 21 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Thanks for making my point. They've still seen ad revenue decline for 25 years. And NYT is widely regarded as part of the MSM problem today for trying to shape the narrative and agenda. I made no point for you, maybe in some alternate fucking universe. The NYT is alive, well and growing unlike most of their industry. That was my point and is the exact fucking opposite of what you agreed with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 8 minutes ago, Angry ginger said: Times is a good paper, glad their online reading resets based on ip so everyday when i log into my system i get another 10 articles. there was a lot of good papers, there is still a couple of local papers that I buy to this day but for the most part they are a dying breed and I will enjoy reading them until they fall victim of the times. I never cared for the NYT, WSJ or USA today but would still read them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Maddows numbers are up bigley too because the butt hurt is soothed in a echo chamber I assume Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 5 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: because the butt hurt is soothed in a echo chamber I assume No shit they arnt watching for anything but FAKE NEWS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 First SNL......... Now, NYT!!!!!? Rolling...... Rolling....... Rolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 12 hours ago, Catman said: Doesn't surprise me in the slightest that's what you read for. and you were still dead fucking wrong in your assessment. I made no point for you, maybe in some alternate fucking universe. The NYT is alive, well and growing unlike most of their industry. That was my point and is the exact fucking opposite of what you agreed with. another Canadian douchenozzle thats probably followed American politics for about 5 years and thinks he has it all figured out. New York Times is cited by liberals as the de facto news source. The rest of the country has figured out their bias. Maybe you will too someday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 8 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: another Canadian douchenozzle thats probably followed American politics for about 5 years and thinks he has it all figured out. New York Times is cited by liberals as the de facto news source. The rest of the country has figured out their bias. Maybe you will too someday. 119 Pulitzer Prizes have been awarded to the Times. They must be doing something right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 I can't believe how some of these publications have gone in the gutter. I read a pretend article from TIME magazine last night, where they took trolled pictures off Conway off the internet and passed it along as actual news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Cold War said: I can't believe how some of these publications have gone in the gutter. I read a pretend article from TIME magazine last night, where they took trolled pictures off Conway off the internet and passed it along as actual news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted March 1, 2017 Share Posted March 1, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Now....................Photo shop a dick in her mouth and you got a real scoop! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.