Rod Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 http://blog.caranddriver.com/ecobust-the-2017-ford-gt-will-get-slapped-with-a-gas-guzzler-tax/ thats pretty funny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 ahhh ....show me a car that can compete with the GT that isnt getting the guzzler tax Geeze buttcocks ....could you look any more snowrideresque? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 6, 2017 Author Share Posted January 6, 2017 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: ahhh ....show me a car that can compete with the GT that isnt getting the guzzler tax Geeze buttcocks ....could you look any more snowrideresque? And which one of those has an engine with the name "Eco" in it this thing is looking more like a failure all the time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 7 minutes ago, Sludgey said: And which one of those has an engine with the name "Eco" in it this thing is looking more like a failure all the time actually it looks amazing and smacks the living fuck out of anything the general has ever made !!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 6, 2017 Author Share Posted January 6, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: actually it looks amazing and smacks the living fuck out of anything the general has ever made !!!!!!!!! Really what are the performance stats of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 19 minutes ago, Sludgey said: Really what are the performance stats of it? 0-60 in .7 sec and 1.3 in the 1/4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 6, 2017 Author Share Posted January 6, 2017 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: 0-60 in .7 sec and 1.3 in the 1/4 Fake! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Sludgey said: Fake! those are actually the numbers from my 800HO !!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 57 minutes ago, Sludgey said: And which one of those has an engine with the name "Eco" in it Oops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted January 7, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted January 7, 2017 Gm will be getting out of the truck business in canada soon. It has to be losing proposition for them in Canada since nobody really buys them besides the low iq portion of nookland. http://www.goodcarbadcar.net/2017/01/december-2016-canada-best-selling-pickup-truck-sales-figures.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 1 hour ago, BOHICA said: Gm will be getting out of the truck business in canada soon. It has to be losing proposition for them in Canada since nobody really buys them besides the low iq portion of nookland. http://www.goodcarbadcar.net/2017/01/december-2016-canada-best-selling-pickup-truck-sales-figures.html Five new special edition trucks. I'd say they are getting desperate. http://www.chevrolet.com/special-edition-silverado.html You can put lipstick on a pig but it's still a pig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 7, 2017 Author Share Posted January 7, 2017 Lt4 v8 has almost the same combined mileage rating as the "Eco"boothtth highway rating Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6: 11 mpg city, 18 mpg highway, and 14 mpg combined. My twin turbo V8 X5 is rated 14/20. ECO(?) is right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 7, 2017 Author Share Posted January 7, 2017 (edited) Ford took billions from the government to build fuel efficient engines that get hit with the GG tax wtf Edited January 7, 2017 by Sludgey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snake said: twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6: 11 mpg city, 18 mpg highway, and 14 mpg combined. My twin turbo V8 X5 is rated 14/20. ECO(?) is right! yah and whats your faggot beemer rated to tow? and what does it weigh .....try not looking like such a fucking moron huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted January 7, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted January 7, 2017 5 minutes ago, Snake said: twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V-6: 11 mpg city, 18 mpg highway, and 14 mpg combined. My twin turbo V8 X5 is rated 14/20. ECO(?) is right! That is the raptor numbers correct??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 7, 2017 Author Share Posted January 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: yah and whats your faggot beemer rated to tow? and what does it weigh .....try not looking like such a fucking moron huh? Likely more than the FGT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted January 7, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted January 7, 2017 Did GM get the shake fixed in there brand new trucks. They all pretty much do it, it is just a matter if the owner tolerates the shake as normal or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 7, 2017 Author Share Posted January 7, 2017 1 minute ago, BOHICA said: That is the raptor numbers correct??? No fgt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted January 7, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted January 7, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Sludgey said: No fgt Pretty good for the factory produced top performance american built supercar.. Edited January 7, 2017 by BOHICA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, BOHICA said: Pretty good for the top production performance american built supercar.. yup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 7, 2017 Author Share Posted January 7, 2017 5 minutes ago, BOHICA said: Pretty good for the factory produced top performance american built supercar.. Really what's it's performance numbers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 11 minutes ago, f7ben said: yah and whats your faggot beemer rated to tow? and what does it weigh .....try not looking like such a fucking moron huh? Like I give a fuck... that's why I own the Ford. This just the wintah beetah..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 7, 2017 Author Share Posted January 7, 2017 Numbers that bad maybe it's e85 only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted January 7, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted January 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, Sludgey said: Really what's it's performance numbers? Patience young grasshopper..... Lemans should be a sign until the series BOP'd that fucker with negative boost and a bunch of weight to slow it down to V8 vette speeds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.