Jump to content

This is got to be the last straw


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Biggie Smails said:

It really is but it is just another deflection away from Hillary.

She is barely going to beat Bernie, maybe.  That should be sending a message to the Democratic party, but just like the Republicans with Trump, it'll probably go unheard.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Cold War said:

No greater display of left-wing hypocrisy.

The brutal murder of innocent civilians

Gets a free pass.

When has Obama/Clinton been asked by any media outlet to answer for the slaughter of innocent people.

Code pink????

Cindy????

Where did you go?

code pink mysteriously disappeared for seven years...weird.

it's amazing that they now show up to protest.......at trump rallies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oleroule said:

code pink mysteriously disappeared for seven years...weird.

it's amazing that they now show up to protest.......at trump rallies.

Paid protestors...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SnowRider said:

:sup:

image.jpeg

 

Is there anyone here that can honestly refute that those bullet points have been a bulwark of GOP policy for the past 30 years?

Please, honest coherent answers only  :bc:

10 hours ago, Capt.Storm said:

 

 Right..tell that to the family of Chris Stevens.

 

Cappy if you want to know the real truth, it was a dangerous mission to be on just because of the locale, Chris Stevens knew this. But if you are looking for blame for the lack of embassy security you really need to look at the Congress.....just trying to keep it real Cappy  :bc:

 

Quote

 

Benghazi attack followed deep cuts in State Department security budget

By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times - Thursday, September 27, 2012

Investigators looking for lessons from the fatal terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi might want to start on Capitol Hill, where Congress slashed spending on diplomatic security and U.S. embassy construction over the past two years.

Since 2010, Congress cut $296 million from the State Department’s spending request for embassy security and construction, with additional cuts in other State Department security accounts, according to an analysis by a former appropriations committee staffer.

Rep. Michael Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, made clear Wednesday that congressional staff will be looking into the attack, in addition to a probe by the State Department’s inspector general and another State Department investigation required by federal law.

The cuts to the embassy construction, security and maintenance budget was almost 10 percent of the entire appropriation for that account over those two years, said Scott Lilly, now a scholar at the left-leaning Center for American Progress.

“Anytime we cut that account back, we are putting people’s lives at risk, people who are serving the country” in dangerous places abroad, said Mr. Lilly.

The cuts mean that “a lot of places you’d intended to secure better, you don’t reach” this year, he added.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/sep/27/benghazi-attack-followed-deep-cuts-in-state-depart/

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Is there anyone here that can honestly refute that those bullet points have been a bulwark of GOP policy for the past 30 years?

Please, honest coherent answers only  :bc:

 

Cappy if you want to know the real truth, it was a dangerous mission to be on just because of the locale, Chris Stevens knew this. But if you are looking for blame for the lack of embassy security you really need to look at the Congress.....just trying to keep it real Cappy  :bc:

 

so in 2010 when the democrats controlled congress they cut the defense budget for security?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
53 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

Crickets :snack:

What crickets you moron..this is about Hillary not to mention I actually agreed with your fucking meme about Republicans.

Edited by Biggie Smails
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said:

 

 

Cappy if you want to know the real truth, it was a dangerous mission to be on just because of the locale, Chris Stevens knew this. But if you are looking for blame for the lack of embassy security you really need to look at the Congress.....just trying to keep it real Cappy  :bc:

 

 

 

Vince,the very next paragraph from that link with all due respect. :bc:

He said he did not know whether the cuts had impacted security at the Benghazi consulate that was stormed on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks by heavily armed Islamic extremists, who burned down the building and killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

A State Department official told The Washington Times that there was no impact on security in Benghazi from the cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also,

State Department Official Charlene Lamb Testified Before The House Oversight Committee That Budget Cuts Had Nothing To Do With Security Decisions In Benghazi. REP. DANA ROHRABACHER (R-CA): “It has been suggested the budget cuts are responsible for lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Ms. Lamb, you made this decision personally, was there any budget consideration and lack of budget that led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?” CHARLENE LAMB: “No, sir.” (U.S. House Of Representatives, Oversight And Government Reform Committee, Hearing, 10/10/12)

Edited by Capt.Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another,

 

The Senate report said that State Department officials ignored “increasingly dangerous threat assessments” that indicated the Benghazi facility was “particularly vulnerable.” That report cited classified intelligence reports and well-publicized “attacks and other incidents targeting western interests in Libya” prior to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. facility in Benghazi. It said the State Department should have increased security or “closed or temporarily shut down” its facility in Benghazi, calling the decision to leave the facility open “a grievous mistake.”

 

But what diff does it makes say's Hillary.

 

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/10/clinton-and-the-benghazi-reports/

Edited by Capt.Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Momorider said:

Don't expect Ballsack to be correct at anything, you will always disappointed :guzzle: 

I am waiting patiently for his reply though just the same.

I like how you capitalized Ballsack- just to give some respect..lol.

Edited by Capt.Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Warren would be a good pick for her.

 Kinda like a ugly girl surrounding herself with even uglier girls , to make her look a little more attractive in comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Psychiatrist Confirms: Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder

As a clinical and forensic psychiatrist, Lyle Rossiter has treated over 1,500 patients and examined over 2,700 civil and criminal cases. Turning his hand to political psychopathology, the author of The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, has diagnosed an alarming percentage of the population as suffering from the grotesque form of mental derangement known by some as moonbattery.

Among Rossiter's observations:

Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded. Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.
A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity — as liberals do. A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population — as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state — as liberals do.
The roots of liberalism — and its associated madness — can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind. When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.

Basically liberalism is a willful failure to mature beyond adolescence that can have catastrophic consequences for society. With luck, the official diagnosis of this disease by a mental health professional will facilitate the search for a cure.

On tips from Jimbo and Hutchrun.

 

Posted by Van Helsing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Momorider said:

Don't expect Ballsack to be correct at anything, you will always disappointed :guzzle: 

Hey Cappy read the whole article and came back with an educated response, that is something none of us have ever seen you do and that is a fact. 

3 hours ago, Capt.Storm said:

I am waiting patiently for his reply though just the same.

I like how you capitalized Ballsack- just to give some respect..lol.

Well you do know that the consulate in Benghazi was nothing more than residential complex that a US mission was operating out of. Additional security was requested by Stevens and was denied, money among other reasons always comes into play when making decisions on where to deploy resources. Hindsight is 20/20 and by looking at the photo below you can see it was a soft target.

consulate_slideshow.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

State Department Official Charlene Lamb Testified Before The House Oversight Committee That Budget Cuts Had Nothing To Do With Security Decisions In Benghazi. REP. DANA ROHRABACHER (R-CA): “It has been suggested the budget cuts are responsible for lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Ms. Lamb, you made this decision personally, was there any budget consideration and lack of budget that led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”CHARLENE LAMB: “No, sir.” (U.S. House Of Representatives, Oversight And Government Reform Committee, Hearing, 10/10/12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, XCR1250 said:

Psychiatrist Confirms: Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder

As a clinical and forensic psychiatrist, Lyle Rossiter has treated over 1,500 patients and examined over 2,700 civil and criminal cases. Turning his hand to political psychopathology, the author of The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, has diagnosed an alarming percentage of the population as suffering from the grotesque form of mental derangement known by some as moonbattery.

Among Rossiter's observations:

Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded. Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.
A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity — as liberals do. A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population — as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state — as liberals do.
The roots of liberalism — and its associated madness — can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind. When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.

Basically liberalism is a willful failure to mature beyond adolescence that can have catastrophic consequences for society. With luck, the official diagnosis of this disease by a mental health professional will facilitate the search for a cure.

On tips from Jimbo and Hutchrun.

 

Posted by Van Helsing 

Outstanding.  This needs to be it's own thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...