Jump to content

This is got to be the last straw


Recommended Posts

 State Department officials were criticized for denying requests for additional security at the consulate prior to the attack. In her role as Secretary of State,Hillary Clinton subsequently took responsibility for the security lapses.[17]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack

 

there was the blame the video speech..that women can lie with a very straight face.

 

Edited by Capt.Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Oct. 14, 2011, a U.S. drone strike killed 16-year-old U.S. citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, along with his teenage cousin and at least five more civilians, blowing them up as they ate dinner at an outdoor restaurant in Yemen.

Why did the U.S. kill a teenage U.S. citizen in a country where it is not officially at war? Years of investigation by an award-winning journalist suggests that it may have been an intentional killing — not because Abdulrahman was involved in terrorist activity, but rather because his father, Anwar al-Awlaki, was a propagandist for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

That is to say, using Hillary Clinton’s own language, President Obama may have overseen “the murder of civilians who are related to suspected terrorists — even though that’s a war crime.”

Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated by another CIA airstrike on Sep. 30, 2011, just two weeks before his son was killed. He was never given a chance in court, despite the fact that he was a U.S. citizen. He was killed extrajudicially, without a sliver of due process.

After Abdulrahman and his cousin were killed, U.S. officials leaked the story to the press, claiming he had been 21-years-old. Yet his family had his birth certificate, which proved he was 16 and had been born in Denver, Colorado.

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/in_attack_on_trump_clinton_accidentally_admits_drone_killings_of_civilians_are_a_war_crime/

Edited by Capt.Storm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said:

On Oct. 14, 2011, a U.S. drone strike killed 16-year-old U.S. citizen Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, along with his teenage cousin and at least five more civilians, blowing them up as they ate dinner at an outdoor restaurant in Yemen.

Why did the U.S. kill a teenage U.S. citizen in a country where it is not officially at war? Years of investigation by an award-winning journalist suggests that it may have been an intentional killing — not because Abdulrahman was involved in terrorist activity, but rather because his father, Anwar al-Awlaki, was a propagandist for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

That is to say, using Hillary Clinton’s own language, President Obama may have overseen “the murder of civilians who are related to suspected terrorists — even though that’s a war crime.”

Anwar al-Awlaki was assassinated by another CIA airstrike on Sep. 30, 2011, just two weeks before his son was killed. He was never given a chance in court, despite the fact that he was a U.S. citizen. He was killed extrajudicially, without a sliver of due process.

After Abdulrahman and his cousin were killed, U.S. officials leaked the story to the press, claiming he had been 21-years-old. Yet his family had his birth certificate, which proved he was 16 and had been born in Denver, Colorado.

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/in_attack_on_trump_clinton_accidentally_admits_drone_killings_of_civilians_are_a_war_crime/

No greater display of left-wing hypocrisy.

The brutal murder of innocent civilians

Gets a free pass.

When has Obama/Clinton been asked by any media outlet to answer for the slaughter of innocent people.

Code pink????

Cindy????

Where did you go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the regime is captive to its own lies, it must falsify everything. It falsifies the past. It falsifies the present, and it falsifies the future. It falsifies statistics ... It pretends to fear nothing. It pretends to pretend nothing. -Vaclav Havel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all have to keep Snow in perspective. Hillary is like a car he's trying to sell. Got 4 flat tires, the engine is seized, drivers seats missing and the windshields cracked, but it runs and looks brand new. Guaranteed it will never let you down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Snake said:

Whatever keeps the topic off topic, right? :lol:

WTF are you yapping about lil fella? :lol:. How many hearings and how many millions spent on the subject.....by R's and what's been discovered? :lol:. Don't let the facts get in the way :lmao: That's why we can't debate - because you ignore the results of the investigations, hearings, and facts because none support your narrative and opinion. :bc: 

Edited by SnowRider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

WTF are you yapping about lil fella? :lol:. How many hearings and how many millions spent on the subject.....by R's and what's been discovered? :lol:. Don't let the facts get in the way :lmao: That's why we can't debate - because you ignore the results of the investigations, hearings, and facts because none support your narrative and opinion. :bc: 

:lies:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

WTF are you yapping about lil fella? :lol:. How many hearings and how many millions spent on the subject.....by R's and what's been discovered? :lol:. Don't let the facts get in the way :lmao: That's why we can't debate - because you ignore the results of the investigations, hearings, and facts because none support your narrative and opinion. :bc: 

Ignore the results of investigations. Like the IG report that you deflect about?

Like the FBI not releasing evidence due to the need for said evidence in criminal investigations?

Like the fact the FBI simply isn't done yet?

Like I said, you are a consummate practitioner of whistling past the graveyard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 minutes ago, Snake said:

Ignore the results of investigations. Like the IG report that you deflect about?

Like the FBI not releasing evidence due to the need for said evidence in criminal investigations?

Like the fact the FBI simply isn't done yet?

Like I said, you are a consummate practitioner of whistling past the graveyard.

:lol: You've been chasing the Clinton ghosts your entire adult life.....and keep coming up empty.  Who's jumping to conclusions?  You and your ilk :lol: Meanwhile your party's multimillion dollar congressional witch hunt has yielded...... :lol: Gosdy falsifying info?  

The FBI is doing its job - but so far you don't like the results.....and remind me who's jumping to conclusions :wall:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SR, lets go to lala land for a minute here and say Shitlery is on trial facing 10-12 years 3 months before the election.

What if she is behind bars by the time inauguration day comes around?

Where does that leave the Democratic party? 

The party, their leader, and the media has been building this cunt up and shoving her down our throats for 10+ years now.  

That is a lot of investment to barely beat out Bernie now that her time is here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

:lol: You've been chasing the Clinton ghosts your entire adult life.....and keep coming up empty.  Who's jumping to conclusions?  You and your ilk :lol: Meanwhile your party's multimillion dollar congressional witch hunt has yielded...... :lol: Gosdy falsifying info?  

The FBI is doing its job - but so far you don't like the results.....and remind me who's jumping to conclusions :wall:

:lies:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
8 minutes ago, racinfarmer said:

SR, lets go to lala land for a minute here and say Shitlery is on trial facing 10-12 years 3 months before the election.

What if she is behind bars by the time inauguration day comes around?

Where does that leave the Democratic party? 

The party, their leader, and the media has been building this cunt up and shoving her down our throats for 10+ years now.  

That is a lot of investment to barely beat out Bernie now that her time is here.

With Rump as the R - all the D's need to do is put up a qualified candidate.  You're an R - and you have much bigger problems to worry about because your party is in the brink of going extinct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

With Rump as the R - all the D's need to do is put up a qualified candidate.  You're an R - and you have much bigger problems to worry about because your party is in the brink of going extinct. 

:lies:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
13 hours ago, Biggie Smails said:

Could not agree more but just wait for the expected deflections and bullshit here that signifies the stupidity and hackery of the average American voter.

Good old square head doesn't disappoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...