'The Public Deserves to Know': Lone Watchdog Demands Federal Reserve Release Names of Corporations Receiving Taxpayer Bailouts

[spin_dry]

Trump supporters can disregard. 
 

The lone watchdog on a congressional committee formed to oversee the Trump administration's handling of a multi-trillion-dollar coronavirus bailout package demanded Wednesday that the Federal Reserve release to the public both the names of corporations receiving taxpayer bailout money and details on how the funds are being used.

"The public deserves to know which companies are receiving taxpayer-backed lending through the Fed and on what terms, and to be able to monitor what those companies do after receiving taxpayer support," Bharat Ramamurti, thus far the only person who has been appointed to the newly created Congressional Oversight Commission, wrote in a letter to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.

The commission is supposed to have five members chosen by congressional leadersof both parties, but the other slots have not yet been filled even as taxpayer money flies out the door.

"I don't think we're in a position where we can just trust corporations to do the right thing with this money." 
—Bharat Ramamurti, Congressional Oversight CommissionUnder the CARES Act—a nearly 900-page stimulus package President Donald Trump signed into law last month—the Fed was given sweeping controlover hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money, which the central bank can leverage into trillions of dollars in funds to prop up large corporations.

Ramamurti, a former economic adviser to Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), expressed concern that the Fed has not committed to releasing key details about transactions involving such an enormous pot of taxpayer money.

"The public deserves a full documentation of how the Fed uses this money—who gets or doesn't, and on what terms and conditions—to assess whether the Fed is using public money wisely and in accordance with Congress' goals in the CARES Act," Ramamurti wrote in his letter, which can be read in full at the bottom of this story.

"It would undermine public confidence in the Fed for it to provide taxpayer-backed support to a company without the public ever finding out who that company is and what exactly the company received," Ramamurti added.

Ramamurti's demands come as watchdog groups continue to raise alarm about the lack of oversight measures in place to prevent Trump and members of his administration from using coronavirus stimulus money for political purposes or personal enrichment.

As Common Dreams reported, Trump last week abruptly fired an official who was appointed by a group of U.S. inspectors general to head the Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), another oversight panel established by the CARES Act.

"Clearly he's planning to corrupt the $2 trillion in spending Congress just approved, whether it's by steering the money to political favorites, negotiating more favorable terms with certain parties or punishing his enemies with a failure to provide aid," Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate with Public Citizen, said of the president in a statement last week. "Who could have seen this coming? Literally everyone."

Critics have also pointed to an "extremely alarming" provision in the CARES Act that allows the Fed to avoid longstanding transparency requirements as it conducts meetings and makes decisions about corporate bailouts amid the ongoing pandemic.

In an interview on MSNBC Wednesday night, Ramamurti—who was appointed to the Congressional Oversight Commission by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)—warned that the CARES Act imposes "more onerous" restrictions on small businesses seeking taxpayer bailout money than large corporations.

"I think it's particularly disturbing because we've seen over the last eight or 10 years that corporate America tends to look out for shareholders and executives first," said Ramamurti. "We've seen an incredible amount of money go into stock buybacks and dividends, and at the same time we've seen wages for workers basically stagnate. So I don't think we're in a position where we can just trust corporations to do the right thing with this money."

Watch:

 

Read Ramamurti's full letter:

Dear Chairman Powell:

The Federal Reserve has already announced plans for more than $2 trillion in emergency lending, with potentially trillions more to come. Yet it has not announced what information it will publicly release about individual transactions with private companies through taxpayer-backed lending facilities—including whether it will even release the names of individual beneficiaries.

I write to respectfully request that the Federal Reserve publicly release detailed and timely information about each individual transaction. The public deserves to know which companies are receiving taxpayer-backed lending through the Fed and on what terms, and to be able to monitor what those companies do after receiving taxpayer support.

As you know, Section 4003 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") authorizes the Treasury Secretary to "make loans, loan guarantees, and other investments in support of eligible businesses, States, and municipalities that do not, in the aggregate, exceed $500,000,000,000." The Treasury can use as much as $500  billion "to make loans and loan guarantees to, and other investments in programs or facilities established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of providing liquidity to the financial system that supports lending to eligible businesses, States, or municipalities."

The $500 billion from the CARES Act supplements billions in taxpayer money that was already at the Treasury Department's disposal in the Exchange Stabilization Fund. 

In recent weeks, the Treasury Department has used taxpayer money from the Exchange Stabilization Fund and from the CARES Act to support several Fed lending facilities for businesses. Specifically:

• Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility: The Fed, through a special-purpose vehicle ("SPV"), will purchase bonds and syndicated loans, at issuance, from corporations rated investment grade as of March 22, 2020. The Treasury is contributing $50 billion.
• Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility: The Fed, through a SPV, will purchase corporate debt issued by corporations rated investment-grade as of March 22, 2020, on the secondary market, as well as purchase U.S.-listed ETFs that provide exposure to investment-grade corporate bonds. The Treasury is contributing $25 billion. The Primary and Secondary Market Facilities will provide up to $750 billion in total lending.
• Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility: The Fed, through its SPV, will make loans of up to three years, fully secured by eligible asset-backed securities. The Treasury is contributing $10 billion to support lending of up to $100 billion.
• Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility: The Fed will lend to U.S. depository institutions, U.S. bank holding companies, or U.S. branches of foreign banks in exchange for collateral that the borrowers purchase from money market mutual funds. The Treasury is contributing $10 billion.
• Commercial Paper Funding Facility: The Fed, through its SPV, will purchase three-month, dollar-denominated commercial paper, included asset-backed commercial paper, that is highly rated and issued by any U.S. issuer. The Treasury is contributing $10 billion.
• Main Street New Loan Facility and Expanded Loan Facility: The Fed, through its SPV, will purchase 95% participation in new and pre-existing four-year loans make by banks and other lenders to businesses with up to 10,000 employees or up to $2.5 billion in annual revenues. The Treasury is contributing $75 billion to support up to $600 billion in lending.

Collectively, these facilities could pump trillions of dollars into the economy through tens of thousands of individual transactions.

The public deserves a full documentation of how the Fed uses this money—who gets or doesn't, and on what terms and conditions—to assess whether the Fed is using public money wisely and in accordance with Congress' goals in the CARES Act. It would undermine public confidence in the Fed for it to provide taxpayer-backed support to a company without the public ever finding out who that company is and what exactly the company received.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Fed provide regular public reports (no more than 30 days apart) that provide at least the following information on individual transactions through each taxpayer-backed facility that supports businesses:

• The identity of the borrower, including the name of the legal entity and any information the Fed collects about the beneficial owners of that entity
• The loan terms, including interest rate, covenants, repayment provisions, and time period
• The stated or intended use of the proceeds
• The amount of supporting equity behind the deal
• The full deal documents
• If applicable, any supporting information offered to demonstrate that the beneficiary complies with the CARES Acts' prohibition on Fed lending to foreign businesses and to companies controlled by top Executive Branch officials, Members of Congress, and their families.

In addition, I request that the Fed provide the following information for transactions under specific facilities:

Primary Market and Secondary Market Credit Facilities

• The CUSIP
• The bond rating and the identity of the ratings agency providing the rating
• For purchases of shares in a syndicated loan, the identities of other syndicated loan participants
• For ETF purchases, the underlying portfolio holdings of the ETF

Main Street New Loan and Expanded Loan Facilities

• The identity of the "Eligible Lender" (the bank that makes the initial loan)
• The text of the attestations offered by both the Eligible Lender and the Eligible Borrower
• Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility
• The total collateral amount for the entire securitization
• The underlying loan data for the securitization (the loan collateral supporting the securitization), including the identity of the borrowers in the case of corporate and commercial real estate loans
• The supporting credit ratings and the identity of the rating agencies
• The identities of the securitization issuers and arrangers, and the total fees they get from selling the entire securitization (including the junior tranches not bought by the Fed)

Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility

• The specific collateral supporting the loan
• The latest Form N-MFP for the borrower at the time of the loan

Thank you for your prompt consideration.

Sincerely,

Bharat Ramamurti
Member, Congressional Oversight Commission

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news outlet. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.

[Jimmy Snacks]

Glad somebody gives a fuck.

Edited April 17, 2020 by Jimmy Snacks

[spin_dry]

3 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Glad somebody gives a fuck.

Non-trump supporters just don’t understand the complexities of these financial matters. We think everything is actually how it appears. 

[racer254]

Tax holiday would have taken care of this.

[Kivalo]

Hell yes we deserve to know.

[f7ben]

15 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Tax holiday would have taken care of this.

 yah....the fed wouldn’t have printed trillions for the rich if we’d have just got that tax holiday

good god 

Edited April 17, 2020 by f7ben

[racer254]

Just now, f7ben said:

 yah....the fed would have printed trillions for the rich if we’d have just got that tax holiday

good god 

You are too manipulated to understand.  Hey don't forget to stop paying your bills....and then book that cruise with your stimulus money.

[spin_dry]

3 minutes ago, racer254 said:

You are too manipulated to understand.  Hey don't forget to stop paying your bills....and then book that cruise with your stimulus money.

I agree. Ben is way too manipulated to see the immense benefit of a tax holiday for millionaires and billionaires.  

[racer254]

7 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

I agree. Ben is way too manipulated to see the immense benefit of a tax holiday for millionaires and billionaires.  

See, you are trying to manipulate him right now.  

[Angry ginger]

all of these program recepients should be public knowlege from the 10 person company taking PPP money to the banks having to run to the fed window to stay alive.  

[Rigid1]

I'd like to know as well

[racer254]

25 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

all of these program recepients should be public knowlege from the 10 person company taking PPP money to the banks having to run to the fed window to stay alive.  

100% correct.   Then we can all see who gets the preferential treatment.

[1jkw]

1 hour ago, racer254 said:

100% correct.   Then we can all see who gets the preferential treatment.

Here's your first clue, it's not the people getting $1200.00.

[racer254]

25 minutes ago, 1jkw said:

Here's your first clue, it's not the people getting $1200.00.

Yeah, I told you what I think.  Everyone seems to think the 1200 was better.   I don't think they have a clue.  Hate to constantly say "I told you so"

[Anler]

14 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Glad somebody gives a fuck.

Nobody really gives a fuck. republicans will just blame it on democrats and democrats will just blame it on trump. Lather, rinse repeat... 

[1jkw]

1 hour ago, racer254 said:

Yeah, I told you what I think.  Everyone seems to think the 1200 was better.   I don't think they have a clue.  Hate to constantly say "I told you so"

You just can't grasp that when you aren't working a tax holiday gives you shit, 1200.00 helps a lot especially when it's tax free and that 1200.00 is more than the tax burden many people will have after losing months of work.