Jump to content

Del Duca new lib leader.


irv

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, irv said:

What is really funny IRV is you posting the only article that TELLS YOU WHAT TO THINK :lol:  out of the many dozens of articles that tell historical facts about Del you pick the one that is an OPINION PIECE :lol:  

but you know my answer :lol:  

 

good one IRV, great post LILLEY would be proud of you

 

 

The most important part of any article introducing someone is what his enemies think of him :lol: 

PC MPP Paul Calandra, a member of the Ford cabinet, said the Liberal Party had an opportunity to embrace change at its leadership convention in Mississauga this weekend and instead recycled a politician who’s closely linked with the rejected former Liberal government.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor Trail. Like Trudope, I know you likely admire Del dummy but it must hurt knowing this is the best the Libs could do. A clone of Wynne is not going to make them relevant again nor give them official party status again. SBYL.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, irv said:

Poor Trail. Like Trudope, I know you likely admire Del dummy but it must hurt knowing this is the best the Libs could do. A clone of Wynne is not going to make them relevant again nor give them official party status again. SBYL.

 

Ontario PC Party agrees IRV :lol:

 

 

 

It is going to be interesting to see what the deficit is after Doug's 4 years - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Successive Ontario governments increased net debt from $139 billion to $338 billion

However, perhaps the most telling explanation of how Ontario under successive governments since 2003 ran up its provincial net debt from $139 billion to $338 billion—while incurring deficits over 80 per cent of the time—came from former premier Kathleen Wynne in a recent Globe and Mail interview. Wynne lamented the new government’s emphasis on the deficit because “balancing the budget doesn’t inherently mean you’re building anything.”

This simple statement summarizes much of what went wrong under the governments of Dalton McGuinty and Kathleen Wynne—an attitude that there always must be more government spending for something positive to happen. And if the goal was noble, it didn’t matter how much was spent.

Of course, members of the last government, the former premier included, likely believed they were serving the public interest and had a grand vision of what they thought would make Ontario great again. Such a task, however, is always made easier when using other people’s money—in this case, the taxpayers of Ontario and future generations saddled with a large and growing public debt. 

In the end public policy is more complex than the words used by politicians. Deficits and debt are tools available to government to achieve collective goals as decided in our democratic system. However, like all tools, they should be used responsibly or can result in long-term damage to public programs, services and the economy. Deficits and debts are not free money; they come at a cost, primarily interest payments. Debt-service costs represent money not spent on public programs.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/successive-ontario-governments-increased-net-debt-from-139-billion-to-338-billion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...