Snoslinger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 50 minutes ago, JEFF said: Lol... yeah, you go with that. so in that warped little mind of yours, hillary liked the rapist and hated the victim. got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Just now, Zambroski said: She's deplorable. Ya know, I'm sure she didn't think anything of it. She wanted the experience and money. Maybe it was a challenge to her. She certainly didn't have any ethical problem with it - that you can be sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 1 minute ago, SmeeAgain said: Ya know, I'm sure she didn't think anything of it. She wanted the experience and money. Maybe it was a challenge to her. She certainly didn't have any ethical problem with it - that you can be sure. No doubt in my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 17 hours ago, JEFF said: Rape defense. Lawyer. i doubt she much into sex at all seeing bill had to stray. Jesus Christ guys, she was a defence lawyer lol. If lawyers picked and chooses who they defend the system would suck worse than it does now. That being said she's still a lying cunt like momo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Just now, Ebsell said: Jesus Christ guys, she was a defence lawyer lol. If lawyers picked and chooses who they defend the system would suck worse than it does now. That being said she's still a lying cunt like momo. They can and do pick and choose though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Just now, Snoslinger said: http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ When a supposed fact check agency is using her memory to support her facts - they have nothing. They always have a choice and the judge doesn't request defenders. From her book: Quote In her book “Living History,” Clinton recalls that Mahlon Gibson, a Washington County prosecutor, told her that the accused rapist “wanted a woman lawyer” to defend him, and that Gibson had recommended Clinton to Judge Maupin Cummings. “I told Mahlon I really didn’t feel comfortable taking on such a client, but Mahlon gently reminded me that I couldn’t very well refuse the judge’s request.” Not that I care in the slightest bit one way or the other, she was simply doing her job and that's one thing that any attorney has to deal with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 (edited) 17 hours ago, JEFF said: Edited November 8, 2016 by Ebsell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 4 minutes ago, Zambroski said: They can and do pick and choose though. Ethically they aren't supposed to. But try and find a lawyer with morals lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 2 minutes ago, Ebsell said: Jesus Christ guys, she was a defence lawyer lol. If lawyers picked and chooses who they defend the system would suck worse than it does now. That being said she's still a lying cunt like momo. They do pick and choose all the time. If the don't want to handle it, they just recommend someone else and don't take the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 2 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said: They do pick and choose all the time. If the don't want to handle it, they just recommend someone else and don't take the case. Read above post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 6 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said: When a supposed fact check agency is using her memory to support her facts - they have nothing. They always have a choice and the judge doesn't request defenders. From her book: Not that I care in the slightest bit one way or the other, she was simply doing her job and that's one thing that any attorney has to deal with. her story was backed up by others. funny how "evidence" like this is downplayed, but shit pulled out of thin air is more factual Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 8, 2016 Author Share Posted November 8, 2016 29 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said: Public defenders are attorneys on a roll call. I've never heard of a time that you can't refuse or request the case to be assigned to someone else. How do I know this? My father was an attorney. My sister is. My business is in an attorney's office and has been for 25 years. To suggest she had to defend this person is complete nonsense. I'm sure you've read where she had to defend him, but that would have been written by a partisan hack making excuses. Don't the let facts get in the way of a delusion http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 30 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Don't the let facts get in the way of a delusion http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ See post #57 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 33 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Don't the let facts get in the way of a delusion http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ You do realize they are using her own words to fact check her own words.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 4 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said: You do realize they are using her own words to fact check her own words.. so this is where common sense should kick in. or do you think she liked the rapist and hated the victim? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Just now, Snoslinger said: so this is where common sense should kick in. or do you think she liked the rapist and hated the victim? Seriously? I don't think she gave a shit about either. She was just doing her job. I don't fucking care one way or the other. I simply know it complete bullshit when someone says she had to represent him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 It's like the government finding the government not guilty. Some of you put way too much faith in the government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 2 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said: Seriously? I don't think she gave a shit about either. She was just doing her job. I don't fucking care one way or the other. I simply know it complete bullshit when someone says she had to represent him. well some in here think otherwise, obviously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Just now, Snoslinger said: so this is where common sense should kick in. or do you think she liked the rapist and hated the victim? This whole argument is such nonsense. You send a handicapped kid to a Hillary rally with a bunch of anti-Hillary sound bytes and shit like he had, I'm sure he'd get the same treatment there as Trump's rally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 A judge can't make an attorney take a case in the same way he cannot appoint a lawyer to do so uncompensated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 8, 2016 Author Share Posted November 8, 2016 1 hour ago, SmeeAgain said: You do realize they are using her own words to fact check her own words.. Really? Gibson is now Clinton? CNN, June 25, 2014: Gibson said Clinton called him shortly after the judge assigned her to the case and said, “I don’t want to represent this guy. I just can’t stand this. I don’t want to get involved. Can you get me off?” “I told her, ‘Well contact the judge and see what he says about it,’ but I also said don’t jump on him and make him mad,” Gibson said. “She contacted the judge and the judge didn’t remove her and she stayed on the case.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 8, 2016 Author Share Posted November 8, 2016 1 hour ago, SmeeAgain said: This whole argument is such nonsense. You send a handicapped kid to a Hillary rally with a bunch of anti-Hillary sound bytes and shit like he had, I'm sure he'd get the same treatment there as Trump's rally. Where Trump says "get em outta here" and riles his crowd up further Obama talks down the crowd, and explains how the protester has a right to free speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 1 hour ago, SmeeAgain said: This whole argument is such nonsense. You send a handicapped kid to a Hillary rally with a bunch of anti-Hillary sound bytes and shit like he had, I'm sure he'd get the same treatment there as Trump's rally. Yep. Like my old man used to say; "bleeding hearts of the world can find any reason to unite" Just stupid "dog and pony" shit some just love to eat up with a big fat spoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted November 8, 2016 Author Share Posted November 8, 2016 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Yep. Like my old man used to say; "bleeding hearts of the world can find any reason to unite" Just stupid "dog and pony" shit some just love to eat up with a big fat spoon. When you come out of your stupor watch this video slowly, and then think about who is swallowing the lies and bullshit with a big fat spoon. PS stand in front of mirror for help with the answer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.