Jump to content

2 hours of opening arguments by trumps lawyers


BOHICA

Recommended Posts

One senator said they might not want to dismiss, they might let it go to a vote so Trump is found not guilty. 

A dismissal would leave an element of guilt, they don't want that. 

A not guilty vote is total exoneration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Call him as a witness....

 

Democrats step up pressure over witnesses after Bolton bombshell - https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480017-democrats-step-up-pressure-over-impeachment-witnesses-after-bolton-bombshell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, Snake said:

THIS.

IS.

IT.

We'll probably never know because the Senate Republicans won't allow it. Bolton was in the center of this...what are you scared of MoeMoe? If he testifies and exonerates Trump than the Dems look even worse....doesn't the thought of that make your partisan sack tingle? :lmao:

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

We'll probably never know because the Senate Republicans won't allow it. Bolton was in the center of this...what are you scared of MoeMoe? 

You'll probably never know because House Democrats whipped up a pile of shit in record time without doing due diligence.

I'm afraid of 5 more years of your pissing and moaning.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
44 minutes ago, Snake said:

You'll probably never know because House Democrats whipped up a pile of shit in record time without doing due diligence.

I'm afraid of 5 more years of your pissing and moaning.

Well I Listened to 8 years of your crying about Obama so suck it up! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
41 minutes ago, Pete said:

Dems: John Bolton is working for trump? what a douche bag the guy is

Dems: Bolton has the goods on Trump? Hes way cool we love him.

Who cares if he is a douchebag...is he telling the truth...that’s the important part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Who cares if he is a douchebag...is he telling the truth...that’s the important part.

so if he exonerates Trump then he is ok for telling the truth.. sure.. got it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
29 minutes ago, Pete said:

so if he exonerates Trump then he is ok for telling the truth.. sure.. got it..

Then only thing you got is rocks in your head...Let the man speak and let the chips fall where they may. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

We'll probably never know because the Senate Republicans won't allow it. Bolton was in the center of this...what are you scared of MoeMoe? If he testifies and exonerates Trump than the Dems look even worse....doesn't the thought of that make your partisan sack tingle? :lmao:

Yeah you’re not partisan or anything.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2020 at 1:02 AM, Jimmy Snacks said:

 

It at any time Trump testifies under oath about anything he has done as President, within 5 minutes he will have lied under oath.

At that point every Trumpster on here will admit they were wrong an turn on Trump.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm kidding, they'll decide that lying under oath isn't a big deal and this is totally different than when Clinton did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Who cares if he is a douchebag...is he telling the truth...that’s the important part.

if . so sort of like when when a former fbi director was wanting to sell a book and he was supposedly telling the truth . how did that work out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 hours ago, Snake said:

You'll probably never know because House Democrats whipped up a pile of shit in record time without doing due diligence.

I'm afraid of 5 more years of your pissing and moaning.

But they didn't have time to take the traditional route in calling witnesses ....Time was of the essence in removing this very serious threat of a president to our national security. ...just ask Nancy as she held onto the articles for nearly a month.

8 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said:

There wouldn't be articles of impeachment on Clinton or Nixon with the flimsy ass evidence the house has put forward.

I guess hatred isn't reason enuf?

 

quantity-vs-quality.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...