Jump to content

Schiff Lied about MC’s stunning new evidence


jtssrx

Recommended Posts

What a worm this guy is. Runs a completely partisan impeachment operation in the house and then pouts about how partisan the senate trial is. Moron.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Edmo said:

What a worm this guy is. Runs a completely partisan impeachment operation in the house and then pouts about how partisan the senate trial is. Moron.

Hope he gets his fucking teeth knocked out. along with a few others

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mainecat said:

The report suggests....lmao

POLITICO – House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.

But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.

The word document contains a series of questions and answers, but doesn’t identify who is doing the asking or answering. Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma, while the responses include statements such as “we wanted to build Burisma as [an] international company” and “we also thought it would help in Ukraine to have strong international board figures,” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

giphy.webp?cid=790b76117eda8e9fdc626e28b

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

The report suggests....lmao

This is the problem on this site. The story is from politico it’s not some off the reservation site. Why can’t you just say hey maybe schiff lied? He completely lied about the FISA process and Devon Nunez memo. This was proven by the Horowitz report. Why do you keep defending schiff?? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, jtssrx said:

This is the problem on this site. The story is from politico it’s not some off the reservation site. Why can’t you just say hey maybe schiff lied? He completely lied about the FISA process and Devon Nunez memo. This was proven by the Horowitz report. Why do you keep defending schiff?? 

Because he's actually the only one here more retardard than Pouts

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, jtssrx said:

This is the problem on this site. The story is from politico it’s not some off the reservation site. Why can’t you just say hey maybe schiff lied? He completely lied about the FISA process and Devon Nunez memo. This was proven by the Horowitz report. Why do you keep defending schiff?? 

And Politico is a lean lefty site... :lol:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snake said:

POLITICO – House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff appears to have mischaracterized a text message exchange between two players in the Ukraine saga, according to documents obtained by POLITICO — a possible error the GOP will likely criticize as another example of the Democrats’ rushed effort to impeach President Donald Trump.

The issue arose when Schiff (D-Calif.) sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) last week summarizing a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas “continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,” citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: “trying to get us mr Z.” The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.

But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.

The word document contains a series of questions and answers, but doesn’t identify who is doing the asking or answering. Yet the questions center on the hiring practices at Burisma, while the responses include statements such as “we wanted to build Burisma as [an] international company” and “we also thought it would help in Ukraine to have strong international board figures,” which seems to point to Zlochevsky — not the Ukrainian president — as the respondent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

giphy.webp?cid=790b76117eda8e9fdc626e28b

 

“Appears to have”

 

1 hour ago, jtssrx said:

This is the problem on this site. The story is from politico it’s not some off the reservation site. Why can’t you just say hey maybe schiff lied? He completely lied about the FISA process and Devon Nunez memo. This was proven by the Horowitz report. Why do you keep defending schiff?? 

Do you clowns read what you post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other than Adam Schiff saying "I am Adam Schiff," every other thing he's ever said has been completely debunked and disproven.  The fact the media continues to cover this guy and trot him out as an "expert" is all anyone needs to see to believe Trump 100%.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

“Appears to have”

 

Do you clowns read what you post?

But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: “mr Z answers my brother.” That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

giphy.webp?cid=790b76117eda8e9fdc626e28b

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...