Jump to content

Seven Stunning New Pieces of Impeachment Evidence


Recommended Posts

The Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan agency that reports to Congress, found the Trump administration violated a law that governs how the White House disburses money approved by Congress.

The GAO decision comes as the Senate prepares for the impeachment trial of President Trump, a process set to begin Thursday.

“Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the decision states. “OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act.”

 

More facts to trigger Trumpsters. :cop:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SVT MXZ XRS said:

Yea, because Obunghole was a saint :lol::lmao:who didn't do anything that could harm any Americans :lol:  Fucking idiot 

 

Did Obama plot with a Russian against a US ambassador?  You fucktards lost your shit when he Told a Russian that he will have more room to negotiate after the election. Trump had a guy following her and talking about taking her out. Trump spent an hour alone with no US staff. Trump gave away intel to the Russians. What did Obama do that is close?  Not some Breitbart claim but a real scandal involving Russians?

Edited by revkevsdi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Republican controlled house investigated every dem Obama or Clinton move when they had a majority in the house. NO evidence to prosecute on any charges. Not one witness failed to show and Obama issued no executed privileges.

This impeachment investigation has a load of evidence to proceed to the senate with Trumps impeachment AND more evidence comes forward daily. 

Trumps toast. Pence is next with Barr and Pompey. Say hello to President Pelosi.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Did Obama plot with a Russian against a US ambassador?  You fucktards lost your shit when he Told a Russian that he will have more room to negotiate after the election. Trump had a guy following her and talking about taking her out. Trump spent an hour alone with no US staff. Trump gave away intel to the Russians. What did Obama do that is close?  Not some Breitbart claim but a real scandal involving Russians?

Naaaa, Obunghole just gave billions of dollars and uranium to people who don't like us.  Nothing major at all.  

 

It's unbelievable what a complete fucking idiot you are 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SVT MXZ XRS said:

Naaaa, Obunghole just gave billions of dollars and uranium to people who don't like us.  Nothing major at all.  

 

It's unbelievable what a complete fucking idiot you are 

Both statements are false. Idiots follow idiots your the perfect example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mainecat said:

Both statements are false. 

Idiots follow idiots your the perfect example.

Yea ok 

 

You calling anyone else an idiot is beyond comical.

 

You are by far the dumbest mother fucker on any of these sites 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republicans today said they are not required to accept any new evidence: example from today.

 

The Senate should only consider evidence presented in the original House inquiry

The Democratic goal seems to be to turn the Senate trial into a second impeachment investigation ad infinitum. Keep the machinery running, and who knows what else might turn up that pressures Republicans to convict. This isn’t what the Founders intended for the Senate trial, which is supposed to judge the President based on the charges in the House articles.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mainecat said:

No but I collect mag lights......big ones.

Ok, how about if Trump doesn't get the boot, I give you a big MAGLITE...……………………………...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UP YOUR ASS!!!!!!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

Ok, how about if Trump doesn't get the boot, I give you a big MAGLITE...……………………………...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UP YOUR ASS!!!!!!   

I see you couldn’t help yourself....

 

9AB172DF-0CF6-43B0-94F7-D09D3E7C47B3.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, XCR1250 said:

Republicans today said they are not required to accept any new evidence: example from today.

 

The Senate should only consider evidence presented in the original House inquiry

The Democratic goal seems to be to turn the Senate trial into a second impeachment investigation ad infinitum. Keep the machinery running, and who knows what else might turn up that pressures Republicans to convict. This isn’t what the Founders intended for the Senate trial, which is supposed to judge the President based on the charges in the House articles.

You wouldn’t want to find out the truth. 
That would suck. 
 

What are your thoughts on Trump hiring Russian goons who tracked the movement of the US Ambassador to the Ukraine? They knew when her phone and computer were on or off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had their best shot at it and failed.

 

The Constitution gives virtually no guidance about what an impeachment trial is supposed to look like, and the courts have also said they can’t weigh in. … So just as Republicans had little control over the impeachment inquiry in the House, Democrats are now faced with a process where a majority of Republican senators can set the rules of the road.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

The Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan agency that reports to Congress, found the Trump administration violated a law that governs how the White House disburses money approved by Congress.

The GAO decision comes as the Senate prepares for the impeachment trial of President Trump, a process set to begin Thursday.

“Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law,” the decision states. “OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act.”

 

More facts to trigger Trumpsters. :cop:

 

4 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

Did Obama plot with a Russian against a US ambassador?  You fucktards lost your shit when he Told a Russian that he will have more room to negotiate after the election. Trump had a guy following her and talking about taking her out. Trump spent an hour alone with no US staff. Trump gave away intel to the Russians. What did Obama do that is close?  Not some Breitbart claim but a real scandal involving Russians?

Something you can read at your leisure....

https://www.gao.gov/products/B-326013#mt=e-report

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

 

Something you can read at your leisure....

https://www.gao.gov/products/B-326013#mt=e-report

Nothing there about having Ambassadors tailed by Russian thugs or making deals with foreign governments to get dirt on political opponents. Looks like at prisoner exchange that didn’t give 30 days notice.   But for Trumpsters that’s equal. 

Edited by revkevsdi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mainecat said:

The Republican controlled house investigated every dem Obama or Clinton move when they had a majority in the house. NO evidence to prosecute on any charges. Not one witness failed to show and Obama issued no executed privileges.

This impeachment investigation has a load of evidence to proceed to the senate with Trumps impeachment AND more evidence comes forward daily. 

Trumps toast. Pence is next with Barr and Pompey. Say hello to President Pelosi.

Stop.  Just stop.  Enough.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, XCR1250 said:

Republicans today said they are not required to accept any new evidence: example from today.

 

The Senate should only consider evidence presented in the original House inquiry

The Democratic goal seems to be to turn the Senate trial into a second impeachment investigation ad infinitum. Keep the machinery running, and who knows what else might turn up that pressures Republicans to convict. This isn’t what the Founders intended for the Senate trial, which is supposed to judge the President based on the charges in the House articles.

I'm to the point of not caring.  If it was good enough for the House to impeach, it should be good enough for the Senate to convict.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...