Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 22 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Do you think Obama, Clinton, Schiff, Comey, Clapper, Brennan et al are slimier? Are we really going to assign a slime scale number to people now....if that isn’t an indication that the whole thing is fucked than I don’t know what is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 18 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: Rudy would be my choice to look at corrupted foreign politicians. Think about his background as a prosecutor taking down the mob. Better choice than the policy wonks we have seen testifying this week. Tell me about it.....fricken Mayor Giuliani but an abrupt end to my mob related Class B Firework purchases in Little Italy in NYC. ....was buying every year prior to his crackdown. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 12 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Are we really going to assign a slime scale number to people now....if that isn’t an indication that the whole thing is fucked than I don’t know what is. thought it was a simple question. I believe the Democrats are way sleazier. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 7 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: thought it was a simple question. I believe the Democrats are way sleazier. Of course you do and you left out Bush/Cheney. Hillary is a pos...absolutely. Bill was impeached and found not guilty. Clapper, Brennan and most spooks in general regardless of party are generally slimy. Obama May have been ineffective and not liked by you and your ilk but I’m not sure about his slime level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted November 20, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 Trump just summed it up on the TV and Ken Starr agrees this is a big nothing burger now since Soland confirmed 100% without doubt that Trump wanted Nothing from Ukraine, and said with out a doubt that Trump said no Quid pro quo which according to the yesterday talking point from the dems and synonyms also means bribery. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Jimmy Snacks said: Of course you do and you left out Bush/Cheney. Hillary is a pos...absolutely. Bill was impeached and found not guilty. Clapper, Brennan and most spooks in general regardless of party are generally slimy. Obama May have been ineffective and not liked by you and your ilk but I’m not sure about his slime level. Next time I’ll try and ask a simple question more to your liking. I’m quite sure about Obama’s slime level and will hopefully be proven correct in the next several months. Not concerned about re litigating Bush Cheney, if he was guilty of war crimes which seems to be your opinion, too bad the Dems couldn’t make a case. It certainly isn’t a fact like you and a couple dim bulbs like to think. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, DriftBusta said: Next time I’ll try and ask a simple question more to your liking. I’m quite sure about Obama’s slime level and will hopefully be proven correct in the next several months. Not concerned about re litigating Bush Cheney, if he was guilty of war crimes which seems to be your opinion, too bad the Dems couldn’t make a case. It certainly isn’t a fact like you and a couple dim bulbs like to think. What is your deal....I gave you an answer even though I knew it was pointless and I did so without calling you names Mr. I Only Return Fire. BTW what case has been made and proven against Obama...oh yeah..none...fucking stupid old sot. Edited November 20, 2019 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 BTW Castor went down the road of implying that Giuliani was acting on his own irrespective of Trump...Rudy will be the fall guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted November 20, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 Impeaching a president for requiring corruption to be investigated as a prerequisite for a whitehouse meeting is not going to work. No matter how much the democrats try to tie aid to this, it is not going to work as it is not fact. Dems are giving the president the 2020 election on a golden plate at this point. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 The “ya buts” are out in full force today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Sondland: I don’t see how you can call it an irregular channel when you are talking to the president of the united states, the secretary of state, the white house chief of staff, the energy secretary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted November 20, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 Damn Ratcliffe just ended this whole thing. Just facts!!!! Not opinion, presumptions, etc etc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) Elise Stefanik is no joke...right to the point with zero fluff. Not sure about this Swallwell character. Edited November 20, 2019 by Jimmy Snacks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) This Maloney guy is real cocksucker. He is treating Sondland like a POS. Edited November 20, 2019 by Jimmy Snacks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 Just now, Jimmy Snacks said: This Maloney guy is real cocksucker. Absolutely. .....what a coercer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Absolutely. .....what a coercer What a douche. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 What a bloodbath for shifty and the dems.………….. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 4 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Ken Starr just said on Fox News that Sondlands testimony is a bombshell....the plot thickens. Bombshell After further questioning of Sondland, Starr said the case for impeachment remains "muddy [and] murky" and that removing a president should not be based on evidence that is "subject to interpretation." Starr also said it was a "shocking omission" for Sondland not to include in his opening statement the details of a phone conversation with Trump about Ukraine. "President Trump, when I asked him the open-ended question, what do you want from Ukraine? His answer was 'I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.' That's all I got from President Trump," Sondland recalled. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 5 hours ago, Zambroski said: Why can’t he be? He’s part of the President’s staff. No, he's a personal lawyer not a government employee, no? Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 4 hours ago, Carlos Danger said: Rudy would be my choice to look at corrupted foreign politicians. Think about his background as a prosecutor taking down the mob. Better choice than the policy wonks we have seen testifying this week. But he isn't a governmental employee. He is outside the realm of how our country deals with other nations. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: But he isn't a governmental employee. He is outside the realm of how our country deals with other nations. Neal Technically you dont know what he is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 9 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: But he isn't a governmental employee. He is outside the realm of how our country deals with other nations. Neal I see many fall into this trap. The president is under no obligation to use only channels controls by the state department. I can't think of a president who has not had some sort of back channel communications during their presidency going back as far as the founding of the country. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted November 20, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted November 20, 2019 One of the Republicans today suggested that perhaps Rudy was working on his own and on behalf of his own interests in Ukraine.....IMO they are laying the groundwork to make him the patsy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Snake said: Technically you dont know what he is. And it doesn't fucking matter anyway. Sheesh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 NEAL WANTS PROTOCOL FOLLOWED!!!!!! (Psst...there really is none for this). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.