Jump to content

Justin Trudeau is Doing a Great Job


revrnd

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, irv said:

Who's talking about testifying? Oh, that's right, you, as you like to move the goal posts and take the topic off topic. 

What's your thoughts on Trudope's empty threat to sue him???? 74 days and still nothing. :news:

your post was 

That’s how long it’s been since Justin Trudeau threatened to sue me for calling him out over his role in the SNC-Lavalin corruption scandal cover-up. Still no lawsuit though. Why is Trudeau so afraid of testifying under oath in open court?

 

do you even read what you post :dunno: This is the entire reason ANDREW brings the law suit up -- wow IRV 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

your post was 

That’s how long it’s been since Justin Trudeau threatened to sue me for calling him out over his role in the SNC-Lavalin corruption scandal cover-up. Still no lawsuit though. Why is Trudeau so afraid of testifying under oath in open court?

 

do you even read what you post :dunno: This is the entire reason ANDREW brings the law suit up -- wow IRV 

Fuck, you're dense!! The point of the post was the lawsuit, or lack thereof. I know, anything to distract any negative attention away from your hero, Trudope is what you do best. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, irv said:

Fuck, you're dense!! The point of the post was the lawsuit, or lack thereof. I know, anything to distract any negative attention away from your hero, Trudope is what you do best. :wacko:

Andrew stopped so therefore no law suit 

pretty simple :dunno:   

Andrew brings up the Testify in open court all the time

 

Andrew loves your blind vote IRV 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, irv said:

Scheer basically says Trudope will say this and say that right in front of Trudope, and low and behold, Trudope says those things!! :lol:

 https://www.thepostmillennial.com/watch-scheer-predicts-exact-talking-points-trudeau-will-use-trudeau-then-uses-them/

 

Because he's an acting P.M.-he has to have lines to read=drama teacher-can't think for himself=not too bright=his Mom!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

I believe Scheer stopped talking his shit :dunno:  pretty sure that is it

 

still don't know why Trudeau would have to testify - just seems dumb for a leader to be so wrong 

 

 

Really you have no clue?

If there is a lawsuit then Scheer’s lawyers will file a defence and Trudeau will be called to answer questions under oath.  He will have to verify what he said and his role and dealings with SNC.

Trudeau beaked off about a lawsuit then found out he would have to testify right before an election.   And we know that would destroy him.

 

I can’t believe you can actually function in society.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sksman said:

Really you have no clue?

If there is a lawsuit then Scheer’s lawyers will file a defence and Trudeau will be called to answer questions under oath.  He will have to verify what he said and his role and dealings with SNC.

Trudeau beaked off about a lawsuit then found out he would have to testify right before an election.   And we know that would destroy him.

 

I can’t believe you can actually function in society.

wrong

completely wrong on all accounts

ANDREW would have to prove his statements, The defendant at no time would be questioned in court - pretty much clear a defendant never has to take the stand EVER 

 

fuck  man 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

I saw this :lol:  

1 they ordered pizza - pizza place delivers

2 all plastics are not in use as per picture

3 again Trudeau isn't using a plastic tool

4 single use plastics isn't today or even close - its a thought for the future

5 :lol:  what a stretch for a win 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

wrong

completely wrong on all accounts

ANDREW would have to prove his statements, The defendant at no time would be questioned in court - pretty much clear a defendant never has to take the stand EVER 

 

fuck  man 

Are you that dense?  Really?  

If Justin Trudeau files a lawsuit he is the Plantiff and Andrew Scheer is the defendant.

You think you can file a lawsuit and not have to answer any questions?

Scheers defence team would subpoena half of the Trudeau cabinet as witnesses. Including Trudeau.

Trudeau would have no choice but to answer under oath!

 

There is no lawsuit because it would blow Justin’s continued story tales out of the water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sksman said:

Are you that dense?  Really?  

If Justin Trudeau files a lawsuit he is the Plantiff and Andrew Scheer is the defendant.

You think you can file a lawsuit and not have to answer any questions?

Scheers defence team would subpoena half of the Trudeau cabinet as witnesses. Including Trudeau.

Trudeau would have no choice but to answer under oath!

 

There is no lawsuit because it would blow Justin’s continued story tales out of the water.

no in this case - Trudeau doesn't take the stand period

YOU CAN'T SPREAD ROMOURS AND HAVE THAT PERSON HAVE TO PROVE THEM WRONG :lol:  that isn't how the law works in the real world 

 

do you want a link :dunno:  not that it matters to you what is true  or not 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

I saw this :lol:  

1 they ordered pizza - pizza place delivers

2 all plastics are not in use as per picture

3 again Trudeau isn't using a plastic tool

4 single use plastics isn't today or even close - its a thought for the future

5 :lol:  what a stretch for a win 

Make him a single term plastic P.M.!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

no in this case - Trudeau doesn't take the stand period

YOU CAN'T SPREAD ROMOURS AND HAVE THAT PERSON HAVE TO PROVE THEM WRONG :lol:  that isn't how the law works in the real world 

 

do you want a link :dunno:  not that it matters to you what is true  or not 

Send me the link please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

no in this case - Trudeau doesn't take the stand period

YOU CAN'T SPREAD ROMOURS AND HAVE THAT PERSON HAVE TO PROVE THEM WRONG :lol:  that isn't how the law works in the real world 

 

do you want a link :dunno:  not that it matters to you what is true  or not 

And how do you think they would prove them wrong?  You can’t be this dumb  really!!!

Would they question the right and wrong fairy?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trudeau had a good week so far.

1.  Mark Norman retired with a undisclosed but mutually agreeable settlement.  You can bet big would describe it.   All a bribe for Mark Norman silence.

2.  Negotiating a emissions friendly car deal between California and Canada.  Why is it not with all of USA?   

3.  Eating pizza with plastic fork?

4.  Our Green warrior has jetted off on another taxpayer junket to another summit to preach his world wisdom for all to follow.   The Conservatives can easily lower Canada’s carbon footprint by eliminating the daily fights of sunny ways shit for brains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sksman said:

Trudeau had a good week so far.

 

2.  Negotiating a emissions friendly car deal between California and Canada.  Why is it not with all of USA?   

3.  Eating pizza with plastic fork?

 

Doug Cancelled the deal with California so Trudeau picked it up -  as for the USA DONNY has no plan since its not an issue  to him

 

didn't see anyone using forks :dunno:   maybe you have a better insight into that pic shown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

Doug Cancelled the deal with California so Trudeau picked it up -  as for the USA DONNY has no plan since its not an issue  to him

 

didn't see anyone using forks :dunno:   maybe you have a better insight into that pic shown

Because Trump has said California cant have its own emissions standards

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-16-other-states-sue-trump-administration-over-plan-to-scrap-emission-standards-epa/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

no in this case - Trudeau doesn't take the stand period

YOU CAN'T SPREAD ROMOURS AND HAVE THAT PERSON HAVE TO PROVE THEM WRONG :lol:  that isn't how the law works in the real world 

 

do you want a link :dunno:  not that it matters to you what is true  or not 

Where is the link?   Still waiting.

And so you know if there is a lawsuit Trudeau would be subpoenaed as a witness  

Trudeau is scared because he can beak off all he wants inside the House of Commons and have parliamentary privilege there but if he actually files a lawsuit outside of the House of Commons then his parliamentary privileges are over ruled and he can be asked questions.  And will be forced to answer truthfully.  And they will also subpoena records and emails.

 

And Andrew Scheer has not stopped  he is actually daring Trudeau to file.  Why is that?

And why is Justin running away scared with his canned answers?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sksman said:

Where is the link?   Still waiting.

And so you know if there is a lawsuit Trudeau would be subpoenaed as a witness  

Trudeau is scared because he can beak off all he wants inside the House of Commons and have parliamentary privilege there but if he actually files a lawsuit outside of the House of Commons then his parliamentary privileges are over ruled and he can be asked questions.  And will be forced to answer truthfully.  And they will also subpoena records and emails.

 

And Andrew Scheer has not stopped  he is actually daring Trudeau to file.  Why is that?

And why is Justin running away scared with his canned answers?

 

I think Trail means, he wishes Andrew would stop as Trail doesn't like the negative attention this brings to his hero, Trudope. :news:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sksman said:

Where is the link?   Still waiting.

And so you know if there is a lawsuit Trudeau would be subpoenaed as a witness  

Trudeau is scared because he can beak off all he wants inside the House of Commons and have parliamentary privilege there but if he actually files a lawsuit outside of the House of Commons then his parliamentary privileges are over ruled and he can be asked questions.  And will be forced to answer truthfully.  And they will also subpoena records and emails.

 

And Andrew Scheer has not stopped  he is actually daring Trudeau to file.  Why is that?

And why is Justin running away scared with his canned answers?

 

 

3 hours ago, irv said:

I think Trail means, he wishes Andrew would stop as Trail doesn't like the negative attention this brings to his hero, Trudope. :news:

Andrew has stopped, he no longer spews off - he no longer says Trudeau committed a criminal offence 

 

unless you can point to him still stating this 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

There are some serious issues with China, I don't think your ONEWAY side posts help or are Pro Canada 

This isn't  a joke or a partisan thing unless you are a ONEWAY 

Edited by 1trailmaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...