Jump to content

How can anyone deny Obama has created this??


jtssrx

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jtssrx said:

I'm fucked up because I think it's wrong that he jumps on every cop shooting that involves blacks with zero knowledge is always proven wrong and ignores the murders in every large inner city of America??

 

im fucked up because he refuses to label any act of terrorism committed by Mullins "Islamic extremism" but as soon as there is any shooting involving white people he jumps right in and uses it for political gain. 

 

Im fucked up because I disagree with his stance that police target blacks when it's statistically proven that it's not true??

 

pleaese stfu you have zero factual evidence to support your claims, you're just like Obama 

The flat earth society guy talks about factual evidence. You are amazing. You are as dumb as shit. You read every psycho right wing site and listen to their interpretations of Obamas speeches as gospel. Basically you are one of those completely pathetic assholes who grew up believing anyone could be President. But you thought that meant anyone white. It must kill you that a black guy who was the product of a broken home leap frogged over your sorry ass. Well go fuck yourself you dumb lazy little bitch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

The flat earth society guy talks about factual evidence. You are amazing. You are as dumb as shit. You read every psycho right wing site and listen to their interpretations of Obamas speeches as gospel. Basically you are one of those completely pathetic assholes who grew up believing anyone could be President. But you thought that meant anyone white. It must kill you that a black guy who was the product of a broken home leap frogged over your sorry ass. Well go fuck yourself you dumb lazy little bitch.

 

This is what liberals do. When confronted with truth or facts you take to calling names and accusing people of being racist or sexist or a bigot or stupid. I'm non of those and mocking me because of flat earth as no you Snowrider and a few others have done only shows how intellectually dishonest you are. 

 

I suppported two black candidates over the last two elections and would have been happy to have either as our president. Both Herman Cain and Ben Carson ha great ideas and would have been good presidents. I also supported Sarah Palin and Carliy Fornia. Unlike you who disparages anyone who disagrees with you politically I simply disagree with Obama on policy. 

 

Feel free to respond with name calling and flat earth 🌏 jokes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jtssrx said:

This is what liberals do. When confronted with truth or facts you take to calling names and accusing people of being racist or sexist or a bigot or stupid. I'm non of those and mocking me because of flat earth as no you Snowrider and a few others have done only shows how intellectually dishonest you are. 

 

I suppported two black candidates over the last two elections and would have been happy to have either as our president. Both Herman Cain and Ben Carson ha great ideas and would have been good presidents. I also supported Sarah Palin and Carliy Fornia. Unlike you who disparages anyone who disagrees with you politically I simply disagree with Obama on policy. 

 

Feel free to respond with name calling and flat earth 🌏 jokes 

RevcockinhaleSki is a serious fucking bufoon :guzzle: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jtssrx said:

This is what liberals do. When confronted with truth or facts you take to calling names and accusing people of being racist or sexist or a bigot or stupid. I'm non of those and mocking me because of flat earth as no you Snowrider and a few others have done only shows how intellectually dishonest you are. 

 

I suppported two black candidates over the last two elections and would have been happy to have either as our president. Both Herman Cain and Ben Carson ha great ideas and would have been good presidents. I also supported Sarah Palin and Carliy Fornia. Unlike you who disparages anyone who disagrees with you politically I simply disagree with Obama on policy. 

 

Feel free to respond with name calling and flat earth 🌏 jokes 

That would be fine if you actually supported your arguments with facts. If you had the ability to compare the effectiveness of different Presidents, you would see that Obama has done an amazing job considering the shit he inherited. Out of control debt from two wars and a housing crisis. Along with a stock market that was trashed and took the rest of the world with it. Add to that the rest of the world was pretty fucking fed up the the shit the USA had done to them. He somehow pulled a countries together to take down Libya, had enough sense to stay out of Syria and kept a lid on the this happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

We can get sidetracked on a lot of topics. But lets compare how Obama to down Libya to how Bush took down Afghanistan or Iraq. 

Disbanding the army after invading Iraq was a huge mistake. It dragged out the conflict, caused unrest, allowed Alqueda into Iraq etc. That was either done because Bush and Cheney were complete fucking morons. Or worse it was done as an excuse to allow private security firms to fleece the American taxpayer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

That would be fine if you actually supported your arguments with facts. If you had the ability to compare the effectiveness of different Presidents, you would see that Obama has done an amazing job considering the shit he inherited. Out of control debt from two wars and a housing crisis. Along with a stock market that was trashed and took the rest of the world with it. Add to that the rest of the world was pretty fucking fed up the the shit the USA had done to them. He somehow pulled a countries together to take down Libya, had enough sense to stay out of Syria and kept a lid on the this happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

We can get sidetracked on a lot of topics. But lets compare how Obama to down Libya to how Bush took down Afghanistan or Iraq. 

Disbanding the army after invading Iraq was a huge mistake. It dragged out the conflict, caused unrest, allowed Alqueda into Iraq etc. That was either done because Bush and Cheney were complete fucking morons. Or worse it was done as an excuse to allow private security firms to fleece the American taxpayer. 

While I hate both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars congress aboved both both supported by Hillary Clinton. Obama illegally invaded Libya and is illegally engaging in war in Syria via ISIS. Obama is no different then bush and the reason the MSM and many neocon republicans support Hillary and not trump is she will continue the Bush jr Obama military industrial complex war policy's 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jtssrx said:

While I hate both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars congress aboved both both supported by Hillary Clinton. Obama illegally invaded Libya and is illegally engaging in war in Syria via ISIS. Obama is no different then bush and the reason the MSM and many neocon republicans support Hillary and not trump is she will continue the Bush jr Obama military industrial complex war policy's 

See, that's what I mean about you being Stupid. The Republicans lied about WMD's they set things up so that anyone who voted against the wars was seen as unpatriotic. Canadian's supported the war in Afghanistan but when Canada and France refused to take the show on the road American's were so fucking pissed. Obviously it would have been political suicide not to stand behind the President when he said that he had irrefutable evidence of WMD's that were a clear and present danger. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

See, that's what I mean about you being Stupid. The Republicans lied about WMD's they set things up so that anyone who voted against the wars was seen as unpatriotic. Canadian's supported the war in Afghanistan but when Canada and France refused to take the show on the road American's were so fucking pissed. Obviously it would have been political suicide not to stand behind the President when he said that he had irrefutable evidence of WMD's that were a clear and present danger. 

 

Yeah all those really smart libs fell for Bushes lies:lol:

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them." 
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998 


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998


"No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing.  He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators.""Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998


"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001     

"I mean, we have three different countries that, while they all present serious problems for the United States -- they're dictatorships, they're involved in the development and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction -- you know, the most imminent, clear and present threat to our country is not the same from those three countries.  I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country."

-- Sen. John Edwards (D, NC) Feb. 24, 2002 

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.   We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."   "
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
 

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated.  He must be disarmed.  We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, MA) Sep. 27, 2002 

"Now let me be clear -- I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein.  He is a brutal man.  A ruthless man.  A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power.  He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.  He's a bad guy.  The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him."
-- State Senator Barack Obama (Democrat, Illinois) Oct. 2, 2002 

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002


"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction." 

-- Senator John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002 

"We stopped the fighting [in 1991] on an agreement that Iraq would take steps to assure the world that it would not engage in further aggression and that it would destroy its weapons of mass destruction.  It has refused to take those steps.  That refusal constitutes a breach of the armistice which renders it void and justifies resumption of the armed conflict." 
-- Sen. Harry Reid (D. NV) Oct. 9, 2002



"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002


"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities.  I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein.  ...  Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein.  Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."  
-- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D. CA) Oct. 10, 2002


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002


"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

"People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons."
-- Ex President Bill Clinton, Jul. 22, 2003 (Interview with CNN Larry King)


I asked very direct questions of the top people in the CIA and people who'd served in the Clinton administration.  And they said they believed that Saddam Hussein either had weapons or had the components of weapons or the ability to quickly make weapons of mass destruction.  What we're worried about is an A-bomb in a Ryder truck in New York, in Washington and St. Louis.  It cannot happen.  We have to prevent it from happening.  

-- Rep. Richard Gephardt (D, MT) Nov. 2, 2003
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

See, that's what I mean about you being Stupid. The Republicans lied about WMD's they set things up so that anyone who voted against the wars was seen as unpatriotic. Canadian's supported the war in Afghanistan but when Canada and France refused to take the show on the road American's were so fucking pissed. Obviously it would have been political suicide not to stand behind the President when he said that he had irrefutable evidence of WMD's that were a clear and present danger. 

 

these clowns have very selective and short memories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snoslinger said:

these clowns have very selective and short memories.

If you really wanted to think about it, it was these blind fucks that stood behind Bush without any question that should really take the blame for the absolute shit that their soldiers had to endure. If they had actually listened to the people questioning the wars instead of mindlessly chanting USA< USA< USA maybe Bush would have had to justify the wars.

But even after it is completely evident that he lied, he was wrong and he handled it poorly, they are now ready to follow a draft dodging punk like Trump when he says he;s going to BOMB BOMB BOMB. Those dumb fucks never learn. 

Your soldiers pay the price, the civilians in these countries pay the price and the taxpayer pays the price for their complete fucking stupidity packaged as patriotism. 

IMO true patriotism is Obama strategically using your armed forces without losing thousand of

Just check this little nugget out.

http://www.snopes.com/u-s-embassy-attacks-compared/

But Hey Benghaziiiiiiiii Benghaziiiiii     

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snopes LOL!

 

Quote

North Carolina Hillary Supporter Brags on Facebook About Voting Multiple Times

Jim Hoft Oct 27th, 2016 8:53 pm 128 Comments

Hillary supporter Robert Dougherty from Jacksonville, North Carolina bragged on Facebook today about how he committed voter fraud.

Robert boasted on how he voted for some of his Facebook friends using their identities, and tells them not to worry about voting, because he’s already done it for them.

And he’s bragging about it on Facebook.

Robert boasts about how they give you a sticker every time you vote.  
He says he will continue to vote all next week!

dougherty-vote-often-575x305.jpg

dougherty-vote-often-2-575x305.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2016 at 11:04 PM, revkevsdi said:

See, that's what I mean about you being Stupid. The Republicans lied about WMD's they set things up so that anyone who voted against the wars was seen as unpatriotic. Canadian's supported the war in Afghanistan but when Canada and France refused to take the show on the road American's were so fucking pissed. Obviously it would have been political suicide not to stand behind the President when he said that he had irrefutable evidence of WMD's that were a clear and present danger. 

 

No you're the stupid one. I agree he lied but it wasn't he who lied the entire government was well aware. You still think there is a difference between the party's. Obama has continued the bush policy's. Clinton will continue them as well

Youre a blind partisan hack

Edited by jtssrx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...