rump-rider Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 57 minutes ago, Sal Rosenberg said: I like both but the fatass chevy can't even come close to the GT in the cool factor I'm not sure of this because I don't really follow supercars, but I thought I read the new camaros lost a lot of weight and were now substantially less than the mustangs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 1 minute ago, rump-rider said: I'm not sure of this because I don't really follow supercars, but I thought I read the new camaros lost a lot of weight and were now substantially less than the mustangs. Only so much weight you can take off of a car that has a back seat. It's an everyday man's performance car. World class performance is going to cost around 6 figures... For starters... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Rosenberg Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 2 minutes ago, rump-rider said: I'm not sure of this because I don't really follow supercars, but I thought I read the new camaros lost a lot of weight and were now substantially less than the mustangs. I don't follow it very much either so maybe the camaro lost a lot of weight , but I have seen the new ones and they still look like a big fat ugly brick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doos Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 5 minutes ago, Edmo said: It would be a riot to test drive them back to back. I'd probable take the ZL1 because I like the looks better. They're both pretty cool, along with the Challenger. I'd be happy with any of them but would likely go with Mustang based on the sound the 5.2 makes. I should never own one however lol. Ask Ludwig about the time we took his Cobra out after a Michigan game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Go Cubs! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 36 minutes ago, Anler said: Who the fuck talks like that at his age? Like we are supposed to be impressed or something... Webba? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skidude600 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 No doubt that if i won the lottery I'd have a Hellcat, GT350 and a ZL1 in my 20 car garage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snatchslayer Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 I'd go straight to the ford gt,a 15...not the gay ecofuck version for 17? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 25, 2016 Author Share Posted October 25, 2016 3 hours ago, SVT Renegade XRS said: ZL1 Supercharged 6.2 VS GT350 N/A 5.2 And it's only 2.6 seconds behind Pour GM So the gt350 is slower cause it's inferior? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 25, 2016 Author Share Posted October 25, 2016 2 hours ago, Anler said: After I slap the fuck outta you I'm gonna glue my pubes to your upper lip! Lmao 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Sludgey said: So the gt350 is slower cause it's inferior? 2.6 secs slower is more then a fooball field... poor damg Edited October 25, 2016 by Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 25, 2016 Author Share Posted October 25, 2016 4 minutes ago, Dave said: 2.6 secs slower is more then a fooball field... poor damg How many of analers public hairs is that... So AMG can look in the mirror and figure out how long that is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 5 minutes ago, Dave said: 2.6 secs slower is more then a fooball field... poor damg 2.6 over what distance. It's all relative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 10 hours ago, Dave said: Poor AMG will still take the AMG any day . just cant go back to sporting a mullet any more and don't tihnk my wife wants to join the fast pitch or dart team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 3 hours ago, Anler said: I deal with meatheads like you everyday. Save your bullshit for the other kids... They may be intimidated by you , I'm not. Like I said, anytime you wanna try , woman 3 hours ago, Sal Rosenberg said: I'd have you in the trunk too Nits Not after I stuff your shoes up your ass first 2 hours ago, xcr700 said: I'd go straight to the ford gt,a 15...not the gay ecofuck version for 17? '15? 1 hour ago, Sludgey said: So the gt350 is slower cause it's inferior? Stupid Canuck faggot. You're even more clueless than Analreciever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted October 25, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted October 25, 2016 Pretty crazy how well that new Ford 10 Speed automatic that the camaro is running performs. I would guess the mustang will put the new 10 speed they are letting GM use in the mustang... F150's have this same transmission. Everything it seems is faster with automatics these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted October 25, 2016 Author Share Posted October 25, 2016 It's a GM 10 speed. GM realizes that Ford is no competition and is going to let Ford use it to be nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted October 25, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted October 25, 2016 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Sludgey said: It's a GM 10 speed. GM realizes that Ford is no competition and is going to let Ford use it to be nice Nope..... ford took the lead on the 10. GM's baby is some sort of 9 speed or something for front drive cars and CUV that ford will get to use for giving GM the 10 speed http://www.caranddriver.com/flipbook/10-things-to-know-about-the-new-fordgm-10-speed-automatic-transmission Edited October 25, 2016 by BOHICA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Pour dumb fuckin clueless nigger Canuck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snatchslayer Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 7 hours ago, SVT Renegade XRS said: They may be intimidated by you , I'm not. Like I said, anytime you wanna try , woman Not after I stuff your shoes up your ass first '15? Stupid Canuck faggot. You're even more clueless than Analreciever. Sorry . Typo ..Supposed to be 05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 10 hours ago, 02sled said: 2.6 over what distance. It's all relative Ya relatively slower..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 18 minutes ago, Dave said: Ya relatively slower..... You can't see the forest for the trees. 2.6 seconds over say 5 miles versus 2.6 seconds over 1/2 mile is a big variable. Still no mention of the conditions and the driver. The driver is one of the biggest variables. I've watched Indy cars race where the same car same track different day and lap times vary significantly. Gee I wonder why if as you seem to believe the car itself is the only criteria that counts. How about doing a better comparison of the Camaro to the street legal race ready mustang rather than the standard GT 350 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 14 minutes ago, 02sled said: You can't see the forest for the trees. 2.6 seconds over say 5 miles versus 2.6 seconds over 1/2 mile is a big variable. Still no mention of the conditions and the driver. The driver is one of the biggest variables. I've watched Indy cars race where the same car same track different day and lap times vary significantly. Gee I wonder why if as you seem to believe the car itself is the only criteria that counts. How about doing a better comparison of the Camaro to the street legal race ready mustang rather than the standard GT 350 Those are the excuses that the loser uses... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 13 minutes ago, 02sled said: You can't see the forest for the trees. 2.6 seconds over say 5 miles versus 2.6 seconds over 1/2 mile is a big variable. Still no mention of the conditions and the driver. The driver is one of the biggest variables. I've watched Indy cars race where the same car same track different day and lap times vary significantly. Gee I wonder why if as you seem to believe the car itself is the only criteria that counts. How about doing a better comparison of the Camaro to the street legal race ready mustang rather than the standard GT 350 Would you be saying all this dribble if it was a mustang?....I think not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Just now, Dave said: Would you be saying all this dribble if it was a mustang?....I think not. Nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.