Jump to content

Huge logic holes on DNC lawsuit defense.


Recommended Posts

 

Democrat logic tells us not to vote Green because last time it brought us the Iraq invasion, so you should vote for the woman who supported the Iraq invasion instead.

They want us to stop corruption by putting the corrupted candidate in office. They are anti-xenophobia, but not when it comes to Russia, blame the Russians all you like. Rigging elections is bad if it’s Russia, fine and normal if it’s the DNC.

I could go on and on and on. I do, in fact, on Twitter. It’s one of my favorite games right now, spotting Dem logic fails.

But the worst is yet to come. I don’t know if you’ve been following it, but the DNC’s defense against the class action lawsuit filed by Bernie Sanders campaign contributors is putting in place a precedent that I don’t think they’ve thought all the way through yet.

According to this article by the Observer, the DNC lawyers are arguing that neutrality was just a political promise like any other political promise the Democrats make. As rock solid as Hillary’s anti-fracking stance, for example. Something you say but don’t mean. Something that no one in their right mind should take seriously or rely on.

They’re saying that they didn’t keep the promise, but then — meh, politicians never keep promises, whaddya gonna do, am I right boys? So they’re absolved from culpability.

Which says a lot about the DNC and the Democrats in general. That’s your defense? That you’re liars? Wow.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3603760/theres-a-mighty-big-plot-hole-in-the-dncs-lawsuit-defense/#TGtRSBdC8EQMTUCD.99

 
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, motonoggin said:

 

Democrat logic tells us not to vote Green because last time it brought us the Iraq invasion, so you should vote for the woman who supported the Iraq invasion instead.

They want us to stop corruption by putting the corrupted candidate in office. They are anti-xenophobia, but not when it comes to Russia, blame the Russians all you like. Rigging elections is bad if it’s Russia, fine and normal if it’s the DNC.

I could go on and on and on. I do, in fact, on Twitter. It’s one of my favorite games right now, spotting Dem logic fails.

But the worst is yet to come. I don’t know if you’ve been following it, but the DNC’s defense against the class action lawsuit filed by Bernie Sanders campaign contributors is putting in place a precedent that I don’t think they’ve thought all the way through yet.

According to this article by the Observer, the DNC lawyers are arguing that neutrality was just a political promise like any other political promise the Democrats make. As rock solid as Hillary’s anti-fracking stance, for example. Something you say but don’t mean. Something that no one in their right mind should take seriously or rely on.

They’re saying that they didn’t keep the promise, but then — meh, politicians never keep promises, whaddya gonna do, am I right boys? So they’re absolved from culpability.

Which says a lot about the DNC and the Democrats in general. That’s your defense? That you’re liars? Wow.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3603760/theres-a-mighty-big-plot-hole-in-the-dncs-lawsuit-defense/#TGtRSBdC8EQMTUCD.99

 

They have both a private and public argument for why they are corrupt fucking criminals :guzzle: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...