Snoslinger Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 4 hours ago, motonoggin said: do you have a hearing problem dude? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted October 17, 2016 Author Share Posted October 17, 2016 Nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 5 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Nope but you heard the word "read" in that, hence the reason you keep posting it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Just now, Snoslinger said: but you heard the word "read" in that, hence the reason you keep posting it. well what the fuck does "possess" mean .....like if you went online and printed off the emails then you would be in violation of the law? Everything said in that Vid was pure bullshit , fuck you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 10 minutes ago, f7ben said: well what the fuck does "possess" mean .....like if you went online and printed off the emails then you would be in violation of the law? Everything said in that Vid was pure bullshit , fuck you i did't say it was 100% legit, just pointing out he didn't say "read". there are, however, rules like this that apply to stolen documents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: i did't say it was 100% legit, just pointing out he didn't say "read". there are, however, rules like this that apply to stolen documents. you are such a fucking idiot .....you are really giving snowrider a run for his money. I mean sweet fuck man your neck must be about to break from carry HIllary's water. Fucking moron....could you make yourself look any more pathetic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 I possess the email when I'm reading it, dipshit. How the fuck do you think CNN is getting them, by carrier pigeon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 minute ago, motonoggin said: I possess the email when I'm reading it, dipshit. How the fuck do you think CNN is getting them, by carrier pigeon? chiseled in stone and delivered on a flatbed ....highly illegal to possess those. Should have just shot him in the kneecap !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: you are such a fucking idiot .....you are really giving snowrider a run for his money. I mean sweet fuck man your neck must be about to break from carry HIllary's water. Fucking moron....could you make yourself look any more pathetic i'm not the one thinking that cnn is trying to convince people to close their eyes because reading wikileaks is illegal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 5 minutes ago, motonoggin said: I possess the email when I'm reading it, dipshit. How the fuck do you think CNN is getting them, by carrier pigeon? wow, really? noggin 1.0 would understand what the guy was referring to, but noggin 2.0 thinks he's saying "don't read them" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: wow, really? noggin 1.0 would understand what the guy was referring to, but noggin 2.0 thinks he's saying "don't read them" how does the average citizen possess that email in an illegal matter? just curious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: how does the average citizen possess that email in an illegal matter? just curious And how is it "different for 'journalists'"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 omg you fucking bozos. he was not telling people not to look at, read, listen to these documents. he was referring to a law where the media can obtain stolen documents and report them to the public w/out getting in trouble. it's akin to noggin having stolen documents and throwing them around on a street for people to read. the people who read them aren;t in trouble, noggin would be. but for some reason, the media is not liable for "spreading the word". research it if you must. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: omg you fucking bozos. he was not telling people not to look at, read, listen to these documents. he was referring to a law where the media can obtain stolen documents and report them to the public w/out getting in trouble. it's akin to noggin having stolen documents and throwing them around on a street for people to read. the people who read them aren;t in trouble, noggin would be. but for some reason, the media is not liable for "spreading the word". research it if you must. nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGNHL Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 hour ago, SnowRider said: Slinger has been laying the beat down on you clowns You fuckers are so desperate to confirm your preconceived opinions you don't even keep the info in context. Motomomo takes it out of context and Anar laps it up Madame President and Next Dude your posts are all filler, no substance, just like the pink slime used to make your chicken mcnuggets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: nope yep. "illegal to read" Edited October 18, 2016 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 wtf happened in here in my absence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Just now, Snoslinger said: wtf happened in here in my absence? Why would they even say that on a news program? Sounds like scare tactics to me. I wouldn't put it past them lying fucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGNHL Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: wtf happened in here in my absence? I thought you were supposed to still be absent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, GGNHL said: I thought you were supposed to still be absent. i said when the election was over, and it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGNHL Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i said when the election was over, and it is. When your candidate conspires to get one of their friends to become the other side's nominee Id say you're right. Just imagine if Kaisich was the nominee for a second, Hillary would be polling like the Donald is now Edited October 18, 2016 by GGNHL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 23 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: omg you fucking bozos. he was not telling people not to look at, read, listen to these documents. he was referring to a law where the media can obtain stolen documents and report them to the public w/out getting in trouble. it's akin to noggin having stolen documents and throwing them around on a street for people to read. the people who read them aren;t in trouble, noggin would be. but for some reason, the media is not liable for "spreading the word". research it if you must. Lmao. You're quickly moving from Gulag to guillotine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, motonoggin said: Lmao. You're quickly moving from Gulag to guillotine. he is carrying a bathtub full of water on his head Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 9 hours ago, Mainecat said: I voted for Sanders who quickly sold out to Clinton for a lake home and privet jet time. oh and those pesky photos of the Clinton campaign worker who leaked to wikki Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Rosenberg Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 9 minutes ago, GGNHL said: When your candidate conspires to get one of their friends to become the other side's nominee Id say you're right. Just imagine if Kaisich was the nominee for a second, Hillary would be polling like the Donald is now Kaisich would have been pummeled into submission by CNN , MSNBC and the Clinton machine by the end of the first fucking week . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.