frenchy Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 28 minutes ago, Highmark said: Whoosh. Muslim dominant countries do not have to have complete theocratic govt's. Damn you guys are dumb. I didn't remove all Muslim's from their govt I meant no longer be a theocracy. Remove Islam so to speak. except Iran did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, frenchy said: was no sharia before the revolution. You know, the revolution that the US ensured was a success for the Ayatollah. One of us may be misinterpreting each other’s sarcasm here. Not sure which though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 11, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2019 14 minutes ago, spin_dry said: You do know that the IRGC and Saddam’s Republican Guard are/were the only reason fanatical groups like ISIS never took hold in those respective countries? Sure however don't pretend those two were not religiously radical in their own right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchy Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Sure however don't pretend those two were not religiously radical in their own right. nothing of the sort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted July 11, 2019 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2019 27 minutes ago, Highmark said: Sure however don't pretend those two were not religiously radical in their own right. 25 minutes ago, frenchy said: nothing of the sort. HM is one of those guys that won’t admit he is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 33 minutes ago, Highmark said: Sure however don't pretend those two were not religiously radical in their own right. Thanks for seeing my point. Removing the IRGC would be more catastrophic to the region than removal of the Republican Guard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 11, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: HM is one of those guys that won’t admit he is wrong. Bullshit. I'm not like you or Neal. Edited July 11, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford_428cj Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 54 minutes ago, Anler said: It's another WMD scare to pull us into a war. War with Iran will be far worse than it was in Iraq. And no nukes will be found. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford_428cj Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just imagine what Iran would be like before the muslims invaded it & took it over ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 11, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2019 https://www.hrc.org/blog/irans-revolutionary-guard-raids-party-of-supposed-homosexuals-and-devil-wor Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Raids Party of Supposed “Homosexuals and Devil-Worshippers” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 11, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) In the Islamic Republic, the ideas of morality established in law are enforced by ‘moral guardians’ close the regime. Bands of the police force and of the Basidj militia who work under the Revolutionary Guards monitor compliance with “Islamic morals” and “ethics”. First and foremost, this means that women and girls must comply with the dress code (e.g. the compulsory headscarf), and young couples cannot hold hands in public. Members of the Basidj and the Revolutionary Guard are not summoned in instances of arbitrary assault or violence. Rather, if they suspect that someone is homosexual, the victim faces humiliation, violence, arrest and death threats as well as subsequent exclusion, mockery and other forms of humiliation. An open and free life in a same-sex partnership is unthinkable in the Islamic Republic. http://www.ishr.org/countries/islamic-republic-of-iran/homophobia/overview-lgbt-people-in-iran/ Edited July 11, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford_428cj Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Very Cosmopolitan...! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 17 minutes ago, ford_428cj said: Very Cosmopolitan...! Oh...it could be dreamy!!! If America would just leave them alone and all!!!! It's all our fault!!!! "Iran’s foreign minister has defended the nation’s practice of executing gay people, for which the country is receiving condemnation from U.S. and German officials. A journalist from the German newspaper Bild asked, “Why are homosexuals executed in Iran because of their sexual orientation?” “Our society has moral principles,” Sarif replied. “And we live according to these principles. These are moral principles concerning the behavior of people in general. And that means that the law is respected and the law is obeyed.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Oh...it could be dreamy!!! If America would just leave them alone and all!!!! It's all our fault!!!! "Iran’s foreign minister has defended the nation’s practice of executing gay people, for which the country is receiving condemnation from U.S. and German officials. A journalist from the German newspaper Bild asked, “Why are homosexuals executed in Iran because of their sexual orientation?” “Our society has moral principles,” Sarif replied. “And we live according to these principles. These are moral principles concerning the behavior of people in general. And that means that the law is respected and the law is obeyed.” we made them execute gays? Interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 45 minutes ago, Highmark said: https://www.hrc.org/blog/irans-revolutionary-guard-raids-party-of-supposed-homosexuals-and-devil-wor Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Raids Party of Supposed “Homosexuals and Devil-Worshippers” 41 minutes ago, Highmark said: In the Islamic Republic, the ideas of morality established in law are enforced by ‘moral guardians’ close the regime. Bands of the police force and of the Basidj militia who work under the Revolutionary Guards monitor compliance with “Islamic morals” and “ethics”. First and foremost, this means that women and girls must comply with the dress code (e.g. the compulsory headscarf), and young couples cannot hold hands in public. Members of the Basidj and the Revolutionary Guard are not summoned in instances of arbitrary assault or violence. Rather, if they suspect that someone is homosexual, the victim faces humiliation, violence, arrest and death threats as well as subsequent exclusion, mockery and other forms of humiliation. An open and free life in a same-sex partnership is unthinkable in the Islamic Republic. http://www.ishr.org/countries/islamic-republic-of-iran/homophobia/overview-lgbt-people-in-iran/ Yep and remember Uday and qusay's rape rooms and sadaam's wmds and bin laden was in Afghanistan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 All those places are much better off since we brought them freedom 18 years ago! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, Anler said: All those places are much better off since we brought them freedom 18 years ago! Take some of this American Sharia you tribal boy fuckers!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, Pete said: we made them execute gays? Interesting We do. America is responsible for the spread of Sharia law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Just now, Zambroski said: We do. America is responsible for the spread of Sharia law. geez what a shame Now I wont be able to sleep tonight. Thanks for ruining my day.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Pete said: geez what a shame Now I wont be able to sleep tonight. Thanks for ruining my day.. Burn the "sky cloth" and claim death to all of racist America while hating yourself for being born a fucking honky. You'll be fine. Or, just laugh it off as utterances from the willfully ignorant, self-victimized haters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Burn the "sky cloth" and claim death to all of racist America while hating yourself for being born a fucking honky. You'll be fine. Or, just laugh it off as utterances from the willfully ignorant, self-victimized haters. Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 11, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Anler said: Yep and remember Uday and qusay's rape rooms and sadaam's wmds and bin laden was in Afghanistan? Yes. They were as bad as their father. Saddam did have WMD's at one point....in fact he used them on his own people. Bin Laden was in Afg in 2001. What's your point? Edited July 11, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Yes. They were as bad as their father. Saddam did have WMD's at one point....in fact he used them on his own people. Bin Laden was in Afg in 2001. What's your point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: Yes. They were as bad as their father. Saddam did have WMD's at one point....in fact he used them on his own people. Bin Laden was in Afg in 2001. What's your point? My point is this is all some made up shit to justify military action. We did nothing when he gassed his own people because we made Saddam and supported him in the Iran war post revolution because the Iranians ousted our guy. AND.. then we illegally gave weapons to Iran during the same war. Its a big pile of shit and if you cant see it youre a fool "Iraqgate" redirects here. For other uses, see Iraqgate (disambiguation). American support for Ba'athist Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, in which it fought against post-revolutionary Iran, included several billion dollars' worth of economic aid, the sale of dual-use technology, non-U.S. origin weaponry, military intelligence, and special operations training.[1][2] However, the U.S. did not directly supply arms to Iraq.[3] Of particular interest for contemporary Iran–United States relations are the repeated accusations that the U.S. government actively encouraged Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to invade Iran (proponents of this theory frequently describe the U.S. as having given Saddam a "green light"), supported by a considerable amount of circumstantial evidence, but the U.S. government officially denies that any such collusion occurred, and no conclusive proof of it has been found. U.S. government support for Iraq was not a secret and was frequently discussed in open sessions of the Senate and House of Representatives. On June 9, 1992, Ted Koppel reported on ABC's Nightline that the "Reagan/Bush administrations permitted—and frequently encouraged—the flow of money, agricultural credits, dual-use technology, chemicals, and weapons to Iraq. Edited July 11, 2019 by Anler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: Just now, Anler said: My point is this is all some made up shit to justify military action. We did nothing when he gassed his own people because we made Saddam and supported him in the Iran war post revolution because the Iranians ousted our guy. AND.. then we illegally gave weapons to Iran during the same war. Its a big pile of shit and if you cant see it youre a fool "Iraqgate" redirects here. For other uses, see Iraqgate (disambiguation). American support for Ba'athist Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, in which it fought against post-revolutionary Iran, included several billion dollars' worth of economic aid, the sale of dual-use technology, non-U.S. origin weaponry, military intelligence, and special operations training.[1][2] However, the U.S. did not directly supply arms to Iraq.[3] Of particular interest for contemporary Iran–United States relations are the repeated accusations that the U.S. government actively encouraged Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to invade Iran (proponents of this theory frequently describe the U.S. as having given Saddam a "green light"), supported by a considerable amount of circumstantial evidence, but the U.S. government officially denies that any such collusion occurred, and no conclusive proof of it has been found. U.S. government support for Iraq was not a secret and was frequently discussed in open sessions of the Senate and House of Representatives. On June 9, 1992, Ted Koppel reported on ABC's Nightline that the "Reagan/Bush administrations permitted—and frequently encouraged—the flow of money, agricultural credits, dual-use technology, chemicals, and weapons to Iraq. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.