Rod Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 So many alt leftists so mad that the president is innocent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, DUMPY said: So many alt leftists so mad that the president is innocent Certainly not what they expected.. lmao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 18, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 18, 2019 The President cannot be impeached for fulfilling duties granted to him by the constitution. Period. That includes making statements regarding investigations of his cabinet and firing of certain people in the DOJ/FBI. THE PRESIDENT IS THE HEAD OF THE DOJ/FBI. Mueller in a political way is saying we think there might be evidence of obstruction in the general sense but we are not making the call on the constitutionality of the Presidents actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: The President cannot be impeached for fulfilling duties granted to him by the constitution. Period. That includes making statements regarding investigations of his cabinet and firing of certain people in the DOJ/FBI. THE PRESIDENT IS THE HEAD OF THE DOJ/FBI. Mueller in a political way is saying we think there might be evidence of obstruction in the general sense but we are not making the call on the constitutionality of the Presidents actions. so IOW he passed the buck to congress.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 18, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Pete said: so IOW he passed the buck to congress.. Well that and the DOJ. (Barr and Rosenstein) This (below) is extremely important for all the obstruction of justice crowd. Trump took no act to obstruct Mueller. The report says he offered and supplied all witness' and all requested documents without once claiming executive privilege. Now if Trump was even in the general sense obstructing the FBI then why would he not have done more to stop Mueller? Trump acted like an innocent man because he is an innocent man. For those who say he refused to testify on obstruction well that is exactly what a President should do regarding presiding constitutionally. Saying the President obstructed justice for firing Comey is the biggest political hack point of the obstruction busllshit. Even Comey said in his letter to the people at the FBI he said he had the legal authority to do so. Edited April 18, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 fuel up the impeachment machine......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted April 18, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 hour ago, DUMPY said: So many alt leftists so mad that the president is innocent Hate to break it you but this isn't over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) "The President's efforts to influence the investigation were mostly unsuccessful, but that is largely because the persons who surrounded the President declined to carry out orders or accede to his requests," ouch Edited April 18, 2019 by Snoslinger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted April 18, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 18, 2019 There was also a reference to not being able to indict a sitting President but muller was still presenting the information so another body could pursue it...I'm paraphrasing but it could be trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3600 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Slingers car is capable of going over 70 so it's possible he's sped before. Slinger has had an alcoholic beverage, so it's possible he's drove impaired. Slinger has purchased cold medicine, so it's possible he's produced meth. That isn't enough to try or convict him, but we can't rule it out either. Ouch.... Seriously, this is what you sound like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 3 hours ago, Snoslinger said: and what happened to the "this is all made up" cheerleaders? russia didn't meddle! ouch Who has said that. They have meddled in every election since ww2 as have we. That doesn't mean their was collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 A special council never determines guilt or innocence it just provides its report to Congress with its evidence. Congress decides how to proceed. The AG has zero say in guilt or innocence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: There was also a reference to not being able to indict a sitting President but muller was still presenting the information so another body could pursue it...I'm paraphrasing but it could be trouble. You are correct. Congress my now proceed with the report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 hour ago, f7ben said: Say the pos that cheers for China and hates the American worker. How about you kill yourself. Maybe douse yourself in gasoline and have a cigar you stupid fuck Open your eyes. Cheer China? You are a drunk fuckin retarded imbecile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: *queef 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 hours ago, Snoslinger said: "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him." ouch 4 hours ago, Snoslinger said: "The Russian contacts consisted of business connections, offers of assistance to the campaign, invitations for candidate Trump and Putin to meet in person, invitations for campaign officials and representatives of the Russian government to meet, and policy positions seeking improved US-Russian relations," ouch In summation: " We do not have any evidence to prove that the president committed a crime" /end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.