Jump to content

Microplastics Raining Down From The Sky


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, snopro31 said:

Worlds gonna end now

If it were up to you to populate the earth there would never be another child born

Fucking retarded gummy bear virgin dingus 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, f7ben said:

If it were up to you to populate the earth there would never be another child born

Fucking retarded gummy bear virgin dingus 

Im surprised you haven’t just ended yourself yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Interesting read....I knew plastics were an issue in the oceans but not the air as well.

 

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/04/microplastics-pollution-falls-from-air-even-mountains/

The same National Geographic who has a habit of stretching the truth? Global warming alarmists at it again with another fabricated fake news story. :news:

No wonder these alarmists hate the older, more wiser generation and want them to die off. Bill Nye, another lunatic quote!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/emaciated-polar-bear-response-1.4788259   https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6923730/starving-polar-bear-fake-national-geographic-arctic/

https://www.cnet.com/news/bill-nye-cant-wait-for-more-old-people-to-die/  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/bill-nye-older-people-need-to-die-out-before-climate-science-can-advance

 

 

 

climate5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Did you read  the article Irv....anything specific you would like to refute? Plastic pollution does seem to be a problem in the oceans or is that fake news as well?

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Did you read  the article Irv....anything specific you would like to refute? Plastic pollution does seem to be a problem in the oceans or is that fake news as well?

No I didn't as reading the headline was enough. Trust me, I am against plastic pollution and other types as well but when media types lie and fabricate stories to fit their narrative, that is when I draw the line.

I'm also curious if the alarmists are now combining pollution with global warming? That was the first narrative, if we don't stop burning fossil fuels and reduce our carbon footprint, we are going to burn up starting with ice caps/glaciers completely melting away and a 3 meter rise in sea level. 30 yrs later not much has changed other than ice caps have grown, not melted. The list goes on. Nowadays, because nature didn't follow along with the Global warming alarmists narrative they now call it Climate Change. 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

So you just read the headline and decided to discount the whole thing and go on some fake news/climate change rant....bravo.

The National Geographic, due to their fearing mongering, fake news story(s) about the polar bears, etc, doesn't have a lot credibility with me, Jimmy. I read this as another one of those stories so I wasn't about to waste my time yet again.

Like I said, I am against crap being dumped in our lakes, river, streams and oceans and I think we can also do a much better job with what we spew into the air but those things have nothing to do with MMGW. That is nothing but a hoax and a tax grab.

Years ago, when all this B.S. started, nothing was mentioned about the pollution/plastic in our oceans. It was all about how we are heating the earth up by burning fossil fuels and the need to look at other things like solar and wind as alternative energy sources. 

If the original narrative had of been about pollution and what we are doing to our waters and our air, I would have been a 100% on board but since the alarmists fabricated a get rich story about the earth burning up/melting, with zero proof of any of it, that is where I call B.S. on the whole thing.

Maybe the alarmists/movement have now moved away from climate change and are now focusing on pollution? It's gone from MMGW to Climate change so maybe now focusing on pollution is their new narrative? If so, I am all for that but when I hear our Gov't, and others, talk about storms, forest fires, heat waves and flooding and then tell us we can control/stop those things through a tax grabbing Climate changing initiative, you'll never get me on board. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, irv said:

The National Geographic, due to their fearing mongering, fake news story(s) about the polar bears, etc, doesn't have a lot credibility with me, Jimmy. I read this as another one of those stories so I wasn't about to waste my time yet again.

Like I said, I am against crap being dumped in our lakes, river, streams and oceans and I think we can also do a much better job with what we spew into the air but those things have nothing to do with MMGW. That is nothing but a hoax and a tax grab.

Years ago, when all this B.S. started, nothing was mentioned about the pollution/plastic in our oceans. It was all about how we are heating the earth up by burning fossil fuels and the need to look at other things like solar and wind as alternative energy sources. 

If the original narrative had of been about pollution and what we are doing to our waters and our air, I would have been a 100% on board but since the alarmists fabricated a get rich story about the earth burning up/melting, with zero proof of any of it, that is where I call B.S. on the whole thing.

Maybe the alarmists/movement have now moved away from climate change and are now focusing on pollution? It's gone from MMGW to Climate change so maybe now focusing on pollution is their new narrative? If so, I am all for that but when I hear our Gov't, and others, talk about storms, forest fires, heat waves and flooding and then tell us we can control/stop those things through a tax grabbing Climate changing initiative, you'll never get me on board. 

 

 

Do you ever watch those Planet documentaries with narrator David Attenborough? That douche can't get through an episode without bringing up the GW bullshit.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, irv said:

The National Geographic, due to their fearing mongering, fake news story(s) about the polar bears, etc, doesn't have a lot credibility with me, Jimmy. I read this as another one of those stories so I wasn't about to waste my time yet again.

Like I said, I am against crap being dumped in our lakes, river, streams and oceans and I think we can also do a much better job with what we spew into the air but those things have nothing to do with MMGW. That is nothing but a hoax and a tax grab.

Years ago, when all this B.S. started, nothing was mentioned about the pollution/plastic in our oceans. It was all about how we are heating the earth up by burning fossil fuels and the need to look at other things like solar and wind as alternative energy sources. 

If the original narrative had of been about pollution and what we are doing to our waters and our air, I would have been a 100% on board but since the alarmists fabricated a get rich story about the earth burning up/melting, with zero proof of any of it, that is where I call B.S. on the whole thing.

Maybe the alarmists/movement have now moved away from climate change and are now focusing on pollution? It's gone from MMGW to Climate change so maybe now focusing on pollution is their new narrative? If so, I am all for that but when I hear our Gov't, and others, talk about storms, forest fires, heat waves and flooding and then tell us we can control/stop those things through a tax grabbing Climate changing initiative, you'll never get me on board. 

 

 

NO OPINION FOR YOU!!!!!!!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, irv said:

No I didn't as reading the headline was enough. Trust me, I am against plastic pollution and other types as well but when media types lie and fabricate stories to fit their narrative, that is when I draw the line.

I'm also curious if the alarmists are now combining pollution with global warming? That was the first narrative, if we don't stop burning fossil fuels and reduce our carbon footprint, we are going to burn up starting with ice caps/glaciers completely melting away and a 3 meter rise in sea level. 30 yrs later not much has changed other than ice caps have grown, not melted. The list goes on. Nowadays, because nature didn't follow along with the Global warming alarmists narrative they now call it Climate Change. 

 

 

From the guy who supports Trump, this is rich.   Tell us about raking the forest fucktard

It's amazing how many stupid people still exist. Not believing in man made climate change is as dumb as believing a guy who doesn't pay his bill and bankrupted a casino could solve your debt crisis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, snoughnut said:

Do you ever watch those Planet documentaries with narrator David Attenborough? That douche can't get through an episode without bringing up the GW bullshit.

It's sickening when you watch some of these guys. David Suzuki, Bill Nye, to name a couple. Thing is, neither of them are scientists but they sure are getting rich off of it. :news:

Watch the whole vid if you have time. (at bottom) He admits he basically knows sweet FA and says he is not a climatologist. His net worth is over 25 million dollars. 

 

2 minutes ago, Snake said:

NO OPINION FOR YOU!!!!!!!

I know, I stepped over the line by not asking for permission yet again.:lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, revkevsdi said:

From the guy who supports Trump, this is rich.   Tell us about raking the forest fucktard

It's amazing how many stupid people still exist. Not believing in man made climate change is as dumb as believing a guy who doesn't pay his bill and bankrupted a casino could solve your debt crisis.

Nobody should read anything past that whining, dribbly first sentence.  My god...

*sniff, sniff....

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

From the guy who supports Trump, this is rich.   Tell us about raking the forest fucktard

It's amazing how many stupid people still exist. Not believing in man made climate change is as dumb as believing a guy who doesn't pay his bill and bankrupted a casino could solve your debt crisis.

You should honestly seek some help, Rev. Your obsession with Trump is alarming and your assumptions that everyone but you loves him is even more strange. Seriously dude, give it some thought. :news: 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, irv said:

It's sickening when you watch some of these guys. David Suzuki, Bill Nye, to name a couple. Thing is, neither of them are scientists but they sure are getting rich off of it. :news:

Watch the whole vid if you have time. (at bottom) He admits he basically knows sweet FA and says he is not a climatologist. His net worth is over 25 million dollars. 

 

I know, I stepped over the line by not asking for permission yet again.:lol:

 

Yah,

 

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/guest-column-david-suzukis-carbon-footprint-is-immense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Snake said:

NO OPINION FOR YOU!!!!!!!

Yep.  Who the fuck does he think he is to not agree with the article because he didn’t read the whole thing!  

Poor @irv.  For future reference, here’s how this works:

1.) Read headline

2.) Buy in immediately (gut hook) and trigger yourself

3.) Post something emotional agreeing with 100% with the narrative.

4.) Disparage any remarks to the contrary

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

Yep.  Who the fuck does he think he is to not agree with the article because he didn’t read the whole thing!  

Poor @irv.  For future reference, here’s how this works:

1.) Read headline

2.) Buy in immediately (gut hook) and trigger yourself

3.) Post something emotional agreeing with 100% with the narrative.

4.) Disparage any remarks to the contrary

5.) Make negative comment about Trump as that will surely reel in the fish, hook, line and sinker

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snoslinger said:

:lol:

meh scientists and modern day technology, wtf do they know? the ignorance in this place is astonishing. 

The earth will die in 10 years.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Snoslinger said:

:lol:

meh scientists and modern day technology, wtf do they know? the ignorance in this place is astonishing. 

No shit and I love how the little brown shirt faggot jumps in...hey stupid just go deliver your boxes, thanks the teamsters and then STFU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

He read the headline....no wonder you guys are such babbling idiots. 😂

Aw... all upset not everyone had a hissy fit over your outrage of the day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy Snacks said:

No shit and I love how the little brown shirt faggot jumps in...hey stupid just go deliver your boxes, thanks the teamsters and then STFU. 

Boss called and offered me the day off. I will be right here to serve your educational requirements for the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...