Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted April 12, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 12, 2019 2 hours ago, Highmark said: Its the law. They are to show back up for hearings but rarely ever do. Sanctuary cities want them why is it so bad to send them there? It isn't . They probably have more recoreses in place to help them . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 8 hours ago, Mainecat said: What an asshole .... Trump pressured Nielsen to release detained immigrants into so-called sanctuary cities By Evan Perez, CNN Justice Correspondent Washington (CNN)The Trump administration pressured the Department of Homeland Security to release immigrants detained at the southern border into so-called sanctuary cities in part to retaliate against Democrats who oppose President Donald Trump's plans for a border wall, a source familiar with the discussions told CNN on Thursday. Trump personally pushed Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to follow through on the plan, the source said. Nielsen resisted and the DHS legal team eventually produced an analysis that killed the plan, which was first reported by The Washington Post. The proposal is another example of Trump's willingness to enact hardline immigration policies to deliver on border security, a key issue for his political base. Thursday's reports come as the President has amplified his rhetoric on illegal immigration in recent weeks, even threatening to close the southern border if Congress and Mexico don't take action. White House senior adviser Stephen Miller urged senior DHS officials to make the plan a reality, the source said. The plan finally died after Miller and other White House officials pushed it in February, according to the source. Miller was angered that DHS lawyers refused to produce legal guidance that would make the plan viable, saying the proposal would likely be illegal. DHS officials believe that the legal standoff is one reason why Miller has pushed for the firing of John Mitnick, the general counsel for DHS, who is still with the department. A separate DHS official confirmed there was such a proposal. "These are human beings, not game pieces," the official said. Asked to comment, a DHS spokesperson said, "This was a suggestion that was floated and rejected, which ended any further discussion." Another DHS official briefed on the matter disputed that the proposal reached Nielsen. Nielsen left DHS this week after she was forced to resign. "Sanctuary city" is a broad term applied to jurisdictions that have policies in place designed to limit cooperation with or involvement in federal immigration enforcement actions. Cities, counties and some states have a range of informal policies as well as laws that qualify as "sanctuary" positions. Most of the policies center on not cooperating with federal law enforcement on immigration policies. Many of the largest cities in the country have forms of such policies. A spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ripped Trump over the Thursday night reports. "The extent of this administration's cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated," Ashley Etienne said in a statement. "Using human beings — including little children — as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable, and in some cases, criminal. The American people have resoundingly rejected this Administration's toxic anti-immigrant policies, and Democrats will continue to advance immigration policies that keep us safe and honor our values." https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/04/11/politics/immigrant-detainees-sanctuary-cities/index.html You’re a gullible retard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted April 12, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 12, 2019 I cant believe this asshole wants to put them where they are wanted and will fit in best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 9 hours ago, Pete said: he should pack everyone of those cities asshole to elbow with all the illegal fucks.. lets see how they like that. Landscaping, domestic services, hotel back of the house staffing, etc.....it all gets done cheaper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted April 12, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Landscaping, domestic services, hotel back of the house staffing, etc.....it all gets done cheaper Don't waste your breath especially on Dipshit Dopo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 12 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Landscaping, domestic services, hotel back of the house staffing, etc.....it all gets done cheaper Tent sales will go through the roof! How much will trash and excitement removal cost? Ask California for the breakdown. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 10 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: It's really kind of funny, I mean we know Trump is a fuck you kind of guy and let's be honest we know fuck you kind of guys do come up with some fucked up ideas imho great idea those are the places fighting for theses people they love them let them take them all 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 1 hour ago, Mileage Psycho said: Landscaping, domestic services, hotel back of the house staffing, etc.....it all gets done cheaper and this is a good thing why? plenty of people to take those jobs if we start the long overdue prosses of cutting welfare abuse 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 10 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said: Don't waste your breath especially on Dipshit Dopo. 8 hours ago, Ez ryder said: imho great idea those are the places fighting for theses people they love them let them take them all There is no doubt that they can be absorbed into the larger sanctuary cities, and from there many will distribute themselves to locales where friends and families already reside; this whole idea then presents the problem that it's going to be very expensive to get them there, and then it's going to be stupid expensive rounding them up for the eventual immigration hearings that they will have to attend. Let's be honest, these half baked knee jerk solutions (like close the border, sanctuary relocation) our president devises along with Stephen Miller are wildly fiscally irresponsible, but hey on the surface it's appealing to you. 8 hours ago, Ez ryder said: and this is a good thing why? plenty of people to take those jobs if we start the long overdue prosses of cutting welfare abuse Because our captilist system thrives on having a steady stream of cheap willing to work hard immigrants working at menial jobs as a start to there American dream. You mentioned welfare abuse, we know it exists and anyone who puts any thought into thinking that the emotional and physical cripples that are abusing the system can replace a steady stream of immigrant labor to do the hard dirty jobs our society and economy has, needs to have there head examined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted April 13, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 13, 2019 3 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: There is no doubt that they can be absorbed into the larger sanctuary cities, and from there many will distribute themselves to locales where friends and families already reside; this whole idea then presents the problem that it's going to be very expensive to get them there, and then it's going to be stupid expensive rounding them up for the eventual immigration hearings that they will have to attend. Let's be honest, these half baked knee jerk solutions (like close the border, sanctuary relocation) our president devises along with Stephen Miller are wildly fiscally irresponsible, but hey on the surface it's appealing to you. Because our captilist system thrives on having a steady stream of cheap willing to work hard immigrants working at menial jobs as a start to there American dream. You mentioned welfare abuse, we know it exists and anyone who puts any thought into thinking that the emotional and physical cripples that are abusing the system can replace a steady stream of immigrant labor to do the hard dirty jobs our society and economy has, needs to have there head examined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 18 minutes ago, Jimmy Snacks said: X2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Vince just smacked the emotional reactionaries back like 5 steps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 13, 2019 Author Share Posted April 13, 2019 When a Millennial is offered a job at the Dunkin Donuts drive up and a job at the local golf course raking out traps he will always take the Donut job cause it’s easier. We need people to take those physical labor jobs.......and to pay taxes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: There is no doubt that they can be absorbed into the larger sanctuary cities, and from there many will distribute themselves to locales where friends and families already reside; this whole idea then presents the problem that it's going to be very expensive to get them there, and then it's going to be stupid expensive rounding them up for the eventual immigration hearings that they will have to attend. Let's be honest, these half baked knee jerk solutions (like close the border, sanctuary relocation) our president devises along with Stephen Miller are wildly fiscally irresponsible, but hey on the surface it's appealing to you. Because our captilist system thrives on having a steady stream of cheap willing to work hard immigrants working at menial jobs as a start to there American dream. You mentioned welfare abuse, we know it exists and anyone who puts any thought into thinking that the emotional and physical cripples that are abusing the system can replace a steady stream of immigrant labor to do the hard dirty jobs our society and economy has, needs to have there head examined. No mention of illegal immigrants. Edited April 13, 2019 by racer254 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 7 minutes ago, racer254 said: No mention of illegal immigrants. They’re “ undocumented guests “ now.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Anler said: Vince just smacked the emotional reactionaries back like 5 steps! 🙄Sure he did. Let’s take some already bankrupt cities and throw a couple thousand more on the welfare rolls. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 13, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 13, 2019 Easiest way to expose their hypocrisy is give them what they want. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, Highmark said: Easiest way to expose their hypocrisy is give them what they want. Nailed it perfectly. Nothing but anti-Trump/America/Anything hypocritical contrarians that are still pushing the liberal fascism as far as they can. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted April 13, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 13, 2019 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: Easiest way to expose their hypocrisy is give them what they want. Perfect Lets see how long those sanc cities remain uncooperative with ICE 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Just now, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Perfect Lets see how long those sanc cities remain uncooperative with ICE No...we pull all ICE out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member ViperGTS/Z1 Posted April 13, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 13, 2019 Just now, Zambroski said: No...we pull all ICE out. Even better 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 Just now, ViperGTS/Z1 said: Even better They got this! Let the "assimilation" begin! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 On 4/12/2019 at 8:17 AM, Mainecat said: What an asshole .... Trump pressured Nielsen to release detained immigrants into so-called sanctuary cities By Evan Perez, CNN Justice Correspondent Washington (CNN)The Trump administration pressured the Department of Homeland Security to release immigrants detained at the southern border into so-called sanctuary cities in part to retaliate against Democrats who oppose President Donald Trump's plans for a border wall, a source familiar with the discussions told CNN on Thursday. Trump personally pushed Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen to follow through on the plan, the source said. Nielsen resisted and the DHS legal team eventually produced an analysis that killed the plan, which was first reported by The Washington Post. The proposal is another example of Trump's willingness to enact hardline immigration policies to deliver on border security, a key issue for his political base. Thursday's reports come as the President has amplified his rhetoric on illegal immigration in recent weeks, even threatening to close the southern border if Congress and Mexico don't take action. White House senior adviser Stephen Miller urged senior DHS officials to make the plan a reality, the source said. The plan finally died after Miller and other White House officials pushed it in February, according to the source. Miller was angered that DHS lawyers refused to produce legal guidance that would make the plan viable, saying the proposal would likely be illegal. DHS officials believe that the legal standoff is one reason why Miller has pushed for the firing of John Mitnick, the general counsel for DHS, who is still with the department. A separate DHS official confirmed there was such a proposal. "These are human beings, not game pieces," the official said. Asked to comment, a DHS spokesperson said, "This was a suggestion that was floated and rejected, which ended any further discussion." Another DHS official briefed on the matter disputed that the proposal reached Nielsen. Nielsen left DHS this week after she was forced to resign. "Sanctuary city" is a broad term applied to jurisdictions that have policies in place designed to limit cooperation with or involvement in federal immigration enforcement actions. Cities, counties and some states have a range of informal policies as well as laws that qualify as "sanctuary" positions. Most of the policies center on not cooperating with federal law enforcement on immigration policies. Many of the largest cities in the country have forms of such policies. A spokeswoman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ripped Trump over the Thursday night reports. "The extent of this administration's cynicism and cruelty cannot be overstated," Ashley Etienne said in a statement. "Using human beings — including little children — as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants is despicable, and in some cases, criminal. The American people have resoundingly rejected this Administration's toxic anti-immigrant policies, and Democrats will continue to advance immigration policies that keep us safe and honor our values." https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/04/11/politics/immigrant-detainees-sanctuary-cities/index.html Remember when Obama had a Somali refugee camp relocated to Lewiston without a word? Yeah, that was great times. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DriftBusta Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, Snake said: Remember when Obama had a Somali refugee camp relocated to Lewiston without a word? Yeah, that was great times. There’s a good reason it’s now referred to as the “ Dirty Lew”. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snopro31 Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 There is nothing wrong with this. Scantuary cities are for these types of people. If they oppose it I guess they aren’t true scantuary cities. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.