Jump to content

Supreme Victory


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Obama admin argued the same side as the Trump admin.   Bet that will be left out of most of the media's narrative.

Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, stating that "neither the statute's text nor its structure" supported the immigrants' argument. The court's conservative justices sided with the Trump administration, which argued as the Obama administration did, against hearings for those convicted of crimes and affected by the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a huge travisty and an even larger setback for people here illegally wanting it to be their right to act like tribal animals and break our laws and not have any consequences. 

Fuck SCOTUS!  AND FUCK TRUMP!!!  

Wait....they are still getting their voting ID's, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zambroski said:

This is a huge travisty and an even larger setback for people here illegally wanting it to be their right to act like tribal animals and break our laws and not have any consequences. 

Fuck SCOTUS!  AND FUCK TRUMP!!!  

Wait....they are still getting their voting ID's, right?

I bet if they became painters....someone would change his mind real quick on the wall.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

:lol: I guess I don't know what this means but..."STUMP"?  WTF?  :lmao: 

I missed it also but I'm guessing either Slinger, DildoRider or Snacks gave him that name......."dumb as a stump"? :dunno::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pete said:

 

1 hour ago, Anler said:

This sounds like some bullshit. Since when have us border agents not been allowed to detain criminals?

Just following Obama's lead, poor Pete.

Quote

Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, stating that "neither the statute's text nor its structure" supported the immigrants' argument. The court's conservative justices sided with the Trump administration, which argued as the Obama administration did, against hearings for those convicted of crimes and affected by the law.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, Mileage Psycho said:

 

Just following Obama's lead, poor Pete.

 

If it got there under Obama it would have went 9-0.  :lol:  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...