Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 12, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2019 Kamala Harris says she listened to Snoop Dogg, Tupac while smoking weed in college years before they made music https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-says-she-listened-to-snoop-dogg-tupac-while-smoking-weed-in-college-years-before-they-made-music The 2020 Democratic presidential contender was then asked what music she listened to when she smoked a joint. Charlamagne tha God bluntly asked, “What was you listening to when you was high? What was on? What song was on?” Harris quickly responded, “Definitely Snoop, Tupac for sure.” However, Harris graduated from Howard University in 1986 and was finished with law school by 1989. She was admitted to the State Bar of California in 1990. Snoop Dogg’s debut album “Doggystyle” was released in 1993. Snoop made music prior to his first album, appearing on Dr. Dre’s 1992 album “The Chronic” and the soundtrack of the 1992 film “Deep Cover,” but they were both released years after Harris finished school. As for Tupac, his first album “2Pacalypse Now” was released in 1991. The rap legend also recorded music as part of the group Digital Underground, but it was also released in the early 1990s after Harris finished school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Yeah, she was cool. The common thread with most libs is being unpopular, on the outside looking in. It is what causes their deep seated rage and victimhood . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 She sucked cock to get where she is too... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Jackson Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 1 minute ago, DAVE said: She sucked cock to get where she is too... Can't hold that against her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 1 minute ago, J. Jackson said: Can't hold that against her. Good point! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Who fucking cares? The level of discourse is now “What music she listened to”. Smh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 15 minutes ago, J. Jackson said: Can't hold that against her. I don't. Work it, sister!!!!!!!!!!! Just now, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Who fucking cares? The level of discourse is now “What music she listened to”. Smh... I wonder what shoes she was wearing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Black woman president? She has a long row to hoe there... I dont think the snoop dog vote will get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted February 12, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2019 When you are a crooked cop who lies to put people in jail your last worry is lieing about what kind of music you listened to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted February 12, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 12, 2019 This is the shiznit from back in the day! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 I think she was just confused on her timeline. I'm sure she enjoyed Snoop and Tupac, but during her college years, she would have been listening to Too $hort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 she's not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of president. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 37 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said: I think she was just confused on her timeline. I'm sure she enjoyed Snoop and Tupac, but during her college years, she would have been listening to Too $hort. Could be. You think Trump tends to get confused about timelines & what not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, oleroule said: she's not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of president. Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Why? both her parents aren't natural born citizens. just like obama and.....trump. Edited February 12, 2019 by oleroule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, oleroule said: both her parents aren't natural born citizens. just like obama and.....trump. You trollin'? Parents don't need to be. Just the candidate. And apparently, that can be "invented" also, so...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 12 minutes ago, oleroule said: both her parents aren't natural born citizens. just like obama and.....trump. 🤦🏼♂️ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 1 hour ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Who fucking cares? The level of discourse is now “What music she listened to”. Smh... it was her constitutes asking the question not some got you question . she is a politition so just can't help but to lie I guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 10 minutes ago, Zambroski said: You trollin'? Parents don't need to be. Just the candidate. And apparently, that can be "invented" also, so...... sorry, not true. because her parents aren't natural born citizens, neither is she. bring on the hate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, oleroule said: sorry, not true. because her parents aren't natural born citizens, neither is she. bring on the hate. Derp derp derp. Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark [US Supreme Court case US v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898)], we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 guy thinks he's the constitutional expert on here regardless of what the courts have said. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted February 12, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted February 12, 2019 Where is @Mainecat to ridicule her for this verbal gaff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted February 12, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted February 12, 2019 17 minutes ago, oleroule said: sorry, not true. because her parents aren't natural born citizens, neither is she. bring on the hate. How do anchor babies work then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Derp derp derp. Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark [US Supreme Court case US v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898)], we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. derp derp derp derp Article 2, Section 1, Clause 4 The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States. how is this relevant to citizenship? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Kivalo said: How do anchor babies work then? no such thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.