Sign in to follow this  
Highmark

Liberals, so desperate to look "cool."

Recommended Posts

:lol:  

Kamala Harris says she listened to Snoop Dogg, Tupac while smoking weed in college years before they made music

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-says-she-listened-to-snoop-dogg-tupac-while-smoking-weed-in-college-years-before-they-made-music

The 2020 Democratic presidential contender was then asked what music she listened to when she smoked a joint. Charlamagne tha God bluntly asked, “What was you listening to when you was high? What was on? What song was on?”

Harris quickly responded, “Definitely Snoop, Tupac for sure.”

However, Harris graduated from Howard University in 1986 and was finished with law school by 1989. She was admitted to the State Bar of California in 1990.

Snoop Dogg’s debut album “Doggystyle” was released in 1993. Snoop made music prior to his first album, appearing on Dr. Dre’s 1992 album “The Chronic” and the soundtrack of the 1992 film “Deep Cover,” but they were both released years after Harris finished school.

As for Tupac, his first album “2Pacalypse Now” was released in 1991. The rap legend also recorded music as part of the group Digital Underground, but it was also released in the early 1990s after Harris finished school.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah,  she was cool.   The common thread with most libs is being unpopular,  on the outside looking in.  It is what causes their deep seated rage and  victimhood . 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She sucked cock to get where she is too...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DAVE said:

She sucked cock to get where she is too...

 

Can't hold that against her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, J. Jackson said:

Can't hold that against her.

Good point!

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, J. Jackson said:

Can't hold that against her.

I don't.  Work it, sister!!!!!!!!!!!  :lmao:

Just now, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Who fucking cares? The level of discourse is now “What music she listened to”. Smh... 

I wonder what shoes she was wearing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Black woman president? She has a long row to hoe there... I dont think the snoop dog vote will get it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you are a crooked cop who lies to put people in jail your last worry is lieing about what kind of music you listened to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the shiznit from back in the day!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think she was just confused on her timeline.  I'm sure she enjoyed Snoop and Tupac, but during her college years, she would have been listening to Too $hort. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

she's not constitutionally qualified to hold the office of president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said:

I think she was just confused on her timeline.  I'm sure she enjoyed Snoop and Tupac, but during her college years, she would have been listening to Too $hort. 

Could be.  You think Trump tends to get confused about timelines & what not? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Why?

both her parents aren't natural born citizens.

just like obama and.....trump.

Edited by oleroule

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oleroule said:

both her parents aren't natural born citizens.

just like obama and.....trump.

You trollin'?

Parents don't need to be.  Just the candidate.  And apparently, that can be "invented" also, so......

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, oleroule said:

both her parents aren't natural born citizens.

just like obama and.....trump.

🤦🏼‍♂️

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Who fucking cares? The level of discourse is now “What music she listened to”. Smh... 

it was her constitutes asking the question not some got you question . she is a politition so just can't help but to lie I guess 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

You trollin'?

Parents don't need to be.  Just the candidate.  And apparently, that can be "invented" also, so......

 

sorry, not true.

because her parents aren't natural born citizens, neither is she.

bring on the hate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oleroule said:

sorry, not true.

because her parents aren't natural born citizens, neither is she.

bring on the hate.

Derp derp derp. 

Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark [US Supreme Court case US v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898)], we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guy thinks he's the constitutional expert on here regardless of what the courts have said.  

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is @Mainecat to ridicule her for this verbal gaff?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, oleroule said:

sorry, not true.

because her parents aren't natural born citizens, neither is she.

bring on the hate.

How do anchor babies work then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Derp derp derp. 

Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark [US Supreme Court case US v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898)], we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.

 

derp derp derp derp

Article 2, Section 1, Clause 4

The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

how is this relevant to citizenship?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Kivalo said:

How do anchor babies work then?

no such thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.