Sign in to follow this  
ActionfigureJoe

The trump land grab

Recommended Posts

Texas landowners dig in to fight Trump’s border wall
BY NOMAAN MERCHANT
1 hour ago
 

HIDALGO, Texas (AP) — As President Donald Trump travels to the border in Texas to make the case for his $5.7 billion wall, landowner Eloisa Cavazos says she knows firsthand how the project will play out if the White House gets its way.

The federal government has started surveying land along the border in Texas and announced plans to start construction next month. Rather than surrender their land, some property owners are digging in, vowing to reject buyout offers and preparing to fight the administration in court.

 

“You could give me a trillion dollars and I wouldn’t take it,” said Cavazos, whose land sits along the Rio Grande, the river separating the U.S. and Mexico in Texas. “It’s not about money.”

Trump is scheduled to visit the border Thursday in McAllen, a city of 143,000 on the river.

Congress in March funded 33 miles (53 kilometers) of walls and fencing in Texas. The government has laid out plans that would cut across private land in the Rio Grande Valley. Those in the way include landowners who have lived in the valley for generations, environmental groups and a 19th century chapel.

Many have hired lawyers who are preparing to fight the government if, as expected, it moves to seize their land through eminent domain.

The opposition will intensify if Democrats accede to the Trump administration’s demand to build more than 215 new miles of wall, including 104 miles in the Rio Grande Valley and 55 miles near Laredo. Even a compromise solution to build “steel slats,” as Trump has suggested, or more fencing of the kind that Democrats have previously supported would likely trigger more court cases and pushback in Texas.

Legal experts say Trump likely cannot waive eminent domain — which requires the government to demonstrate a public use for the land and provide landowners with compensation — by declaring a national emergency.

While this is Trump’s first visit to the border in Texas as president, his administration’s immigration crackdown has been felt here for months.

Hundreds of the more than 2,400 children separated from their parents last summer were detained in cages at a Border Patrol facility in McAllen. Three “tender-age” facilities for the youngest children were opened in this region.

The president also ordered soldiers to the border in response to a wave of migrant caravans before the November election. Those troops had a heavy presence in the Rio Grande Valley, though they have since quietly left. A spokeswoman for the border security mission said they closed their base camp along the border on Dec. 22.

 

But Trump’s border wall will last beyond his administration. Building in the region is a top priority for the Department of Homeland Security because it’s the busiest area for illegal border crossings. More than 23,000 parents and children were caught illegally crossing the border in the Rio Grande Valley in November — more than triple the number from a year earlier.

Homeland Security officials argue that a wall would stop many crossings and deter Central American families from trying to migrate north. Many of those families are seeking asylum because of violence in their home countries and often turn themselves in to border agents when they arrive here.

The number of families has surged. DHS said Wednesday that it detained 27,518 adults and children traveling together on the southern border in December, a new monthly high.

With part of the $1.6 billion Congress approved in March, U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced it would build 25 miles (40 kilometers) of wall along the flood-control levee in Hidalgo County, which runs well north of the Rio Grande.

Congress did not allow construction of any of Trump’s wall prototypes. But the administration’s plans call for a concrete wall to the height of the existing levee, with 18-foot (5.5 meters) steel posts on top. CBP wants to clear 150 feet (45 meters) in front of any new construction for an “enforcement zone” of access roads, cameras, and lighting.

The government sued the local Roman Catholic diocese late last year to gain access for its surveyors at the site of La Lomita chapel, which opened in 1865 and was an important site for missionaries who traveled the Rio Grande Valley by horseback.

It remains an epicenter of the Rio Grande Valley’s Catholic community, hosting weddings and funerals, as well as an annual Palm Sunday procession that draws 2,000 people.

The chapel is a short distance from the Rio Grande. It falls directly into the area where CBP wants to build its “enforcement zone.”

The diocese said it opposes a border wall because the barrier violates Catholic teachings and the church’s responsibility to protect migrants, as well as the church’s First Amendment right of religious freedom. A legal group from Georgetown University has joined the diocese in its lawsuit.

Father Roy Snipes leads prayers each Friday for his chapel to be spared. Wearing a cowboy hat with his white robe and metal cross, he’s known locally as the “cowboy priest” and sometimes takes a boat on the Rio Grande to go from his home to the chapel.

“It would poison the water,” Snipes said. “It would still be a sacred place, but it would be a sacred place that was desecrated.”

The Cavazos family’s roughly 64 acres (0.25 square kilometers) were first purchased by their grandmother 60 years ago.

They rent some of the property to tenants who have built small houses or brought in trailers, charging some as little as $1,000 a year. They live off the earnings from the land and worry that a fence would deter renters and turn their property into a “no man’s land.”

On the rest of the property are plywood barns, enclosures for cattle and goats, and a wooden deck that extends into the river, which flows serenely east toward the Gulf of Mexico. Eloisa’s brother, Fred, can sit on the deck in his wheelchair and fish with a rod fashioned from a long carrizo reed plucked from the riverbank.

Surveyors examined their property in December under federal court order. The family hasn’t yet received an offer for their land, but their lawyers at the Texas Civil Rights Project expect a letter with an offer will arrive in the coming weeks.

“Everybody tells us to sell and go to a better place,” Eloisa Cavazos said. “This is heaven to us.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how you know this thread is but another idiocy unhinged:  1.) The OP's history of these threads.  2.) County, State, Federal easement laws.  And finally..this fine gem of a quote by the person being interviewed:  “You could give me a trillion dollars and I wouldn’t take it,” said Cavazos, whose land sits along the Rio Grande, the river separating the U.S. and Mexico in Texas. “It’s not about money.”

 

:lol: 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Fuck private property right!!!!! Am I right fellow conservatives and libertarians!!!?!?? Bahahaha

Haha no shit...also loved the little nugget about this being Trumps first visit to the border in Texas since he was elected. Running around yammering about a National Emergency without even seeing it first hand...SMH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Haha no shit...also loved the little nugget about this being Trumps first visit to the border in Texas since he was elected. Running around yammering about a National Emergency without even seeing it first hand...SMH.

If he gets Afghanistan shut down he won’t be hassled with a visit to the troops. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Zambroski said:

This is how you know this thread is but another idiocy unhinged:  1.) The OP's history of these threads.  2.) County, State, Federal easement laws.  And finally..this fine gem of a quote by the person being interviewed:  “You could give me a trillion dollars and I wouldn’t take it,” said Cavazos, whose land sits along the Rio Grande, the river separating the U.S. and Mexico in Texas. “It’s not about money.”

 

:lol: 

 

Amazing how all of a sudden certain people here are outraged about this.  Hey, where were you when they built the current fences and walls?  How about when they are building the highways you use everyday.  Are you concerned about your neighbors when it happens to them? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post a simple article and the local alpha vaginas get all sandy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

Post a simple article and the local alpha vaginas get all sandy 

Dude, just take your ownage and start the next TDS thread to bury your hacky, failed ones.

:lol:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....repeat, repeat, repeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Zambroski said:

....repeat, repeat, repeat.

 

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

Dude, just take your ownage and start the next TDS thread to bury your hacky, failed ones.

:lol:

 

This president and his followers such as yourself provides so much material that I can go on for years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Dude, just take your ownage and start the next TDS thread to bury your hacky, failed ones.

:lol:

 

He just posted a thread where someone was able to saw through steel. I know I know....earth shattering news

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

 

This president and his followers such as yourself provides so much material that I can go on for years. 

Even after your suicide?  That’d be cool!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Amazing how all of a sudden certain people here are outraged about this.  Hey, where were you when they built the current fences and walls?  How about when they are building the highways you use everyday.  Are you concerned about your neighbors when it happens to them? 

Nice deflection. Are you in support of private property rights being tossed aside for a political grandstand? Fake ass conservative...

45 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Dude, just take your ownage and start the next TDS thread to bury your hacky, failed ones.

:lol:

 

You didn’t own anyone... This goes against every conservative principle on property rights there is. You look stupid defending this when Trump is only doing this for political gain. I love you fucking morons who think he’s on your side... 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Eminent domain...  hmm the great debate!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Even after your suicide?  That’d be cool!

Suicide is a white male thing. I don’t think he indentifies as either of those 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really surprised there isn't a 100 ft Federal easement along the border.   Really stupid if there is not.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rod Johnson said:

Suicide is a white male thing. I don’t think he indentifies as either of those 

There are exceptions to every liberal rule.

 Hell...it seems there’s nothing BUT exceptions.  Meh, happy trails Spinner!  See you on the other side!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how will it cut across privet land ? US citizens cant own property in mexico so what are we talking a foot of property that 1 can only assume has easement rights for any government official to access or use at any time  seeing as it is a border .     

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess I was right except on the width.   Its 60 feet wide.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roosevelt_Reservation

The Roosevelt Reservation is a 60-foot (18 m) strip of land on the United States side of the United States-Mexico Border under the jurisdiction of the United States Federal Government. It was established in a 1907 Presidential Proclamation (35 Stat. 2136) by Theodore Roosevelt in order to keep the land "free from obstruction as a protection against the smuggling of goods between the United States and Mexico".[1][2][3]

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Really surprised there isn't a 100 ft Federal easement along the border.   Really stupid if there is not.  

I think it’s like 50 feet.  If we need more, it’s covered in the 5th Amendment.  Good thing is for the left, it will be “for the greater good” so, they’ll be fine with it.

:lol:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Zambroski said:

I think it’s like 50 feet.  If we need more, it’s covered in the 5th Amendment.  Good thing is for the left, it will be “for the greater good” so, they’ll be fine with it.

:lol:

 

Keep reading.  :lol:  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Nice deflection. Are you in support of private property rights being tossed aside for a political grandstand? Fake ass conservative...

You didn’t own anyone... This goes against every conservative principle on property rights there is. You look stupid defending this when Trump is only doing this for political gain. I love you fucking morons who think he’s on your side... 

Stop your whining.  Go hug your Mattis bear.

:lol2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Really surprised there isn't a 100 ft Federal easement along the border.   Really stupid if there is not.  

Think about a river basin. The Rio is the border.

2 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

how will it cut across privet land ? US citizens cant own property in mexico so what are we talking a foot of property that 1 can only assume has easement rights for any government official to access or use at any time  seeing as it is a border .     

Let’s say you own all the way to the Rio. Your land occupies low land and hillside going down to that. Where are they going to build that wall? On the hill? In a flood plain? No, they are going to build it on solid ground. How many people will have a shit ton of land cut off? Probably a lot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Highmark said:

Keep reading.  :lol:  

Awww fuck.  I’m always a day late and anickel short.  :wall:

STUPID GIRL SLED!!!!!   :lol:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.